Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Anybody got a GoPro and a good magnet?

Better yet, do this on a dyno so that road surfaces are taken out as a factor.
Posted

If the booming isn't across all vehicles, it's less likely a design flaw and instead defective part(s) or improperly installed parts.

 

Definitely not a design flaw. Two years in to this generation GM is going through the process of finding out which part is defective or improperly installed.

Posted

There is so much speculation in this thread that it is not really useful to a noob like me. I've read so many theories and 'fixes' that did or didn't work that my head is spinning. As a soon to be new owner (2016 Yukon Denali XL set to be delivered mid-January) all I can hope for is that I won't face the issues presented here. Good luck to those of you facing these problems now and I hope they get resolved or that you get out of ownership without losing your ass. Not very confidence inspiring in GM.

Posted (edited)

We need a thread with a head count on who had the problem and got it fixed and what fixed it or improved it. And who had no success and what they tried to fix

Edited by Cl Houn
  • Like 1
Posted

The test drive is key. Don't just settle for the typical 3 mile loop. Insist on 5 minutes each on a highway wide open, crappy roads and regular roads.

 

You want to be able to stay in 35-45 and 65-85 for a few minutes.

 

If it buffets or vibrates, you'll know. In my experience, all boom just find the one that booms the least.

Posted

Have been strongly considering purchasing an 2016 Denali Yukon XL but after reading through these posts I am a little apprehensive of doing so. Will wait and see what happens for now.

Posted

I'd notice it right away too, at the sweet spot speeds and driving over expansion joints. Ditto on the exhaust drone - that's a distinctly different tone which isn't annoying as hell.

If the booming isn't across all vehicles, it's less likely a design flaw and instead defective part(s) or improperly installed parts. Somebody must be able to solve this!

I'd love to be able to visually inspect the underside of the truck while it runs at ~65mph.

My experience has been all the various different ones I drove exhibited the booming/buffeting/pressure, albeit to varying degrees of severity. In my opinion, it is a "design flaw", or more likely a "design oversight". There is something about this SUV platform that is significantly "worse" than others.

 

As I've pointed out before, the phenomenon of "boom" and "drone" is extremely common in vehicles. There are literally hundreds of technical papers addressing it in the auto industry. But, most vehicles it is under control, and hence not noticeable or not annoying. Since dealing with this issue, I have paid attention to all vehicles I drive and every SUV booms when it goes over a pothole or such. But, the sustained booming which becomes the buffeting doesn't happen to them - only the new GM full size. So, there is something about this platform that is either too stiff, or too flexible, or a resonance they missed...or something. Lately, it seems more like a shuddering or fluttering that ends up being the buffeting. And it does seem to come and go, almost like a phasing issue between components.

 

Bottom line, I have zero expectation GM will "solve". This. They will throw some parts at it. New tires. Try to appease the customer until warranty expires. They will win on attrition alone. They will outlast all of us combined. And because this in not a safety related issue, they will invest absolutely minimal resources. In fact, I can almost guarantee that the corporate attitude to this is "fussy customers. There is nothing wrong with this vehicle". That has always been the GM corporate mentality and still is to this day.

Posted (edited)

My experience has been all the various different ones I drove exhibited the booming/buffeting/pressure, albeit to varying degrees of severity. In my opinion, it is a "design flaw", or more likely a "design oversight". There is something about this SUV platform that is significantly "worse" than others.

 

As I've pointed out before, the phenomenon of "boom" and "drone" is extremely common in vehicles. There are literally hundreds of technical papers addressing it in the auto industry. But, most vehicles it is under control, and hence not noticeable or not annoying. Since dealing with this issue, I have paid attention to all vehicles I drive and every SUV booms when it goes over a pothole or such. But, the sustained booming which becomes the buffeting doesn't happen to them - only the new GM full size. So, there is something about this platform that is either too stiff, or too flexible, or a resonance they missed...or something. Lately, it seems more like a shuddering or fluttering that ends up being the buffeting. And it does seem to come and go, almost like a phasing issue between components.

 

Bottom line, I have zero expectation GM will "solve". This. They will throw some parts at it. New tires. Try to appease the customer until warranty expires. They will win on attrition alone. They will outlast all of us combined. And because this in not a safety related issue, they will invest absolutely minimal resources. In fact, I can almost guarantee that the corporate attitude to this is "fussy customers. There is nothing wrong with this vehicle". That has always been the GM corporate mentality and still is to this day.

They're not going to outlast customers in states with solid Lemon Laws. They can keep replacing vehicles until an owner finds a satisfactory one, or spend a lot on lawyers and forced buybacks until it starts to erode the profitability of the line, at which time a solution will need to be found. The beancounters won't let it get too far gone as these are currently among the most profitable vehicles in GM's lineup.

 

The question is, how many people notice the issue and just deal with it VS. those who raise a fuss about it, and is it enough to tip the scales? I have no intention of taking this vehicle back until the issue is rectified. If the technician is bothered by it, then I am pretty sure the situation is still pretty bad.

Edited by Zig10
Posted (edited)

Within about 10 seconds of hitting 40-45. Normally it's jsu an annoyance, but if you have a cold with any kind of sinus pressure it becomes pain-inducing in your ears...or at least in mine. My family has been passing around a head cold for the past 20 days or so, and I haven't been able to drive that car for more than a 5 minute trip to the store and back.

 

The loaner they gave me is a base-model V6 Sierra SLE pickup. It drives pretty poorly and doesn't have enough power to get out of it's own way, but no pressure issues of vibrations of any kind.

 

Sad that I am making payments on a $70k vehicle, stuck driving a $45k vehicle, and somehow this is a better driving experience. How in the hell does GM think that this is acceptable in any way?

 

This sums up where we are with our XL as well...I can only stand to drive it for quick 10min trips. It's unbearable to drive any longer and if if the roof bow attempt and new wheels/tires don't make it acceptable the truck will be gone asap. I'm so disgusted with the whole experience and only wish I would have taken more time before purchasing. But then again, who would ever imagine dealing with buffeting and cabin pressure in 2015 vehicle, let alone $60K+ truck.

 

With 4 kids and current lifestyle, I really want to like the truck but given everything I keep hearing, it appears that we will be shopping for a replacement sooner than later.

 

Also, like a few others have noted, I have noticed within the last few weeks with colder temps that the buffeting/pressure has gotten worse.

Edited by ajs800
Posted

We need a thread with a head count on who had the problem and got it fixed and what fixed it or improved it. And who had no success and what they tried to fix

Why not throw a few sand bags on top? Take a drive. That will tell you........something.

Posted (edited)

Utility trailer road trip experience with my 2016 Yukon Denali

 

3 hour drive with a loaded (1000 lbs) utility trailer on country roads (64 mph) and interstates (75-80 mph). No buffeting or vibrations present. Very quiet. Unhooked the trailer at the place of business and drove without the trailer for another 2 hours. Buffeting, vibrations with the sensation that the Denali was on very small rubble strips.

Back to hook up the trailer and loaded up for the 3 hour trip home, no buffeting or vibrations.

 

My 2016 Denali has never been (even after all the work to try to correct the issues) a luxury vehicle to take on long road trips. Around town is just okay (still get the low speed booming) but out of town - forget it. Unless you're pulling a loaded trailer!!!

 

utility trailer unloaded - bad rhythmic harmonic vibrations

utility trailer loaded - perfect

 

snowmobile trailer unloaded - bad rhythmic harmonic vibrations

snowmobile trailer loaded with 1 sled - noticeable rhythmic vibrations

snowmobile trailer loaded with 2 sleds - perfect

 

28 foot V-nose construction trailer unloaded - perfect

28 foot V-nose construction trailer loaded - perfect

 

Airflow over the Denali definitely could also be a factor. I did notice a difference when I installed a bug deflector on the hood. Not a big difference but better.

Edited by 16Denaliguy
Posted

Utility trailer road trip experience with my 2016 Yukon Denali

 

3 hour drive with a loaded (1000 lbs) utility trailer on country roads (64 mph) and interstates (75-80 mph). No buffeting or vibrations present. Very quiet. Unhooked the trailer at the place of business and drove without the trailer for another 2 hours. Buffeting, vibrations with the sensation that the Denali was on very small rubble strips.

Back to hook up the trailer and loaded up for the 3 hour trip home, no buffeting or vibrations.

 

My 2016 Denali has never (even after all the work to try to correct the issues) a luxury vehicle to take on long road trips. Around town is just okay (still get the low speed booming) but out of town - forget it. Unless you're pulling a loaded trailer!!!

 

utility trailer unloaded - bad rhythmic harmonic vibrations

utility trailer loaded - perfect

 

snowmobile trailer unloaded - bad rhythmic harmonic vibrations

snowmobile trailer loaded with 1 sled - noticeable rhythmic vibrations

snowmobile trailer loaded with 2 sleds - perfect

 

28 foot V-nose construction trailer unloaded - perfect

28 foot V-nose construction trailer loaded - perfect

 

Airflow over the Denali definitely could also be a factor. I did notice a difference when I installed a bug deflector on the hood. Not a big difference but better.

Somebody in the vibrating truck thread just made the same observation as you.

 

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/index.php?/topic/153186-Shake-or-Vibration-Issues

 

If fact, I think this was mentioned before in either of these long running threads.

 

This clue should help an engineer isolated it, no? Please!

Posted

Somebody in the vibrating truck thread just made the same observation as you.

 

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/index.php?/topic/153186-Shake-or-Vibration-Issues

 

If fact, I think this was mentioned before in either of these long running threads.

 

This clue should help an engineer isolated it, no? Please!

Anyone tried mounting a rooftop luggage box and seeing if it makes a difference? If it were just a matter of stiffening the roof it would be a pretty simple matter to add intermediate support between the existing bows. They already have these guys pulling the headliner and rebuilding the bows, all you'd need to do is add some lattice connected in between, like reinforcing a joist bay. Since the movement is so miniscule, it wouldn't take much.

 

That said, I have to think that the engineers on this have tried that. It would be the first thing in mind for a vibration or deflection issue.

 

This has to be deeper than that, or after 2 years of working on it they wouldn't still be throwing darts at the issue and wasting money on fixes that don't seem to yeild too many positive outcomes.

 

Speaking of which, my dealer has moved on to tearing apart the differential in my car. No word back on whether or not it has helped, or if it is out of spec.

 

Never thought I would feel like this much of a dumbass for purchasing a vehicle...

Posted

My dealer is replacing my vehicle. I had the XL but wondering if the non-XL will work just as well for my travel needs. Other than length and the 3rd row not being as comfortable are there any other differences?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,867 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...