Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm guessing that those who have zeroed in on the roof sheet metal being thinner and thereby susceptible to creating a hormonic oscillation at highway speed have nailed the problem. It seems to me that other than re-skinning the roof with thicker metal there's only a few possibilities. One, as someone else suggested, spray the underside with material such as used for spay-in pickup bed liners. Would be very labor intensive and messy if not done with care though. Another, I think it would probably be impractical to space additional bows between present bows but that would probably correct the problem if it could be done. Or, run two rigid supports the length of the underside of roof to put an end to this harmonic oscillation. Of course, all this would have to be affixed to the underside of the roof with some sort of laminate or glue. However, because the problem exhibits itself on a small percent of vehicles there may also be a process control issue at work too.

I believe some people here had their roofs fixed while others yet have had there's checked and with roofs properly glued still report the same problem. Is this correct?
Posted

To add, mine were fixed, problems went away, came detached again, problems came back.

 

I am not 100% convinced that everyone who had the TSB and still has the issues has actually verified their roof bows are attached. If a tech inspected them, did said tech go for a drive on the freeway with the headliner out and actually verify no movement in the roof or just look at the roof while it was at rest? Did the owner shut a door and see if the roof jumps? Or pound the roof and see if the whole expanse resonates? These things can verify that the roof is in fact still attached and if so can verify that despite attached roof bows the problem still exists.

 

Frank

Posted (edited)

Mine were inspected and found to be intact. It has buffeted from the day 1.

 

I can't speak to the methodology that the technicians used, but I do know that there were at least two. One was an Ontario based field engineer and the other was from Michigan, sent to work on my case.

 

The fact that they returned my Yukon to me as "fixed" tells me that they either can't hear the booming/buffeting or that they've done all they can.

 

Either way, I've just become very pessimistic that this will be fixed and that I don't have the long term vehicle I thought I bought.

 

Very disappointing.

Edited by FogDucker
Posted

Well then, appears to me that the only recourse is to go down the repair path until the problem is fixed or until the Lemon Law requirements are met. Then, cash out.

Posted

What can't be explained is that we still have the buffeting even though the roof has been foam shimmed to the roof bows ,glued to the max and with 2 layers of dynamat STILL has the buffeting and booming, Something is not right with mine anyway. It's more evident in the drivers seat than anywhere else in the Denali.

 

It's too funny when family, friends and the tech's ride in the vehicle and say they cannot hear or feel anything. Then they drive it and say "oh yeah I hear and feel it now, that's not good".

Posted

Well then, appears to me that the only recourse is to go down the repair path until the problem is fixed or until the Lemon Law requirements are met. Then, cash out.

 

Agreed. And it starts with me putting my snow shoes up for sale!

Posted (edited)

Ouch, sorry to see you (eventually) go, Marc, your work here has been very valuable

 

Someone had asked about Canada, read this when you have time ... took him over a year, no response so he just took the hit and got into a Mercedes

 

http://www.cadillacforums.com/forums/cadillac-escalade-esv-forum-2015/635369-finally-made-service-appointment-multiple-issues-27.html

Edited by boazEarl8
Posted

I've read where 2 other folks have gotten a return notice from NHTSA, maybe a good thing. I made a complaint on another thread and also received a notice from NHTSA today. The press visibility with the GM fullsize SUVs may have caused NHTSA to assign someone to now follow-up.

 

 

Hello

 

I work for National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) at the Department of Transportation. It is my job to follow up with vehicle owners when they have motor vehicle issues that are submitted on the NHTSA (http://www.nhtsa.gov/) or safercar.gov websites .

 

We would like your permission to share information regarding your complaint, including your vehicle identification number (VIN), with General Motors.

 

Thank you for your assistance.

 

 

Robert Caple

BLF Technologies Inc.

on assignment with National Highway Traffic

Safety Administration, U.S. Dept. Of Transportation

202.366.0864

 

 

For what it's worth, I received same email yesterday and responded with an approval to share with GM.

Posted

To add, mine were fixed, problems went away, came detached again, problems came back.

 

I am not 100% convinced that everyone who had the TSB and still has the issues has actually verified their roof bows are attached. If a tech inspected them, did said tech go for a drive on the freeway with the headliner out and actually verify no movement in the roof or just look at the roof while it was at rest? Did the owner shut a door and see if the roof jumps? Or pound the roof and see if the whole expanse resonates? These things can verify that the roof is in fact still attached and if so can verify that despite attached roof bows the problem still exists.

 

Frank

I'm not 100% sure that visually seeing the roof skin bounce when a door if closed is proof of the source of the buffeting. Case in point.... A colleague at work drives a 2009 Trailblazer. The roof jumps like crazy when a door is slammed shut. The vehicle exhibits absolutely zero booming, droning, or buffeting sounds at any and all speeds.

 

My company 2009 Ford Explorer also shows the roof bounce when a door is slammed. No buffeting.

 

Granted, different vehicles, different size roofs, different aerodynamics....the differences are endless. But what is the same is bouncing roof, yet not all bouncing roofs equal buffeting.

 

Just saying.....

Posted

You misunderstand my point. The roof jumping means it is not attached. Secondly, our roofs are much larger and thinner than the older vehicle you mention and thus require more bracing not to buffet. You might have a vehicle that for whatever reason does not excite the thin roof but it would appear in our case there too many disturbances to have an unrestrained roof and no buffeting.

 

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Posted

Interested in hearing from those that have been through the buyback process. Were you charged with a usage fee? How many miles on your truck when you returned it, and what were you charged for the usage fee?

I contacted the dealer with around 200 miles on my car to let them know something was wrong. By the time they finished all of the "fixes", jumped through all the hoops, and convinced GM that it could not be repaired the vehicle had close to 1500 miles on it. The swap to the 2016 model was straight up, no money out of my pocket whatsoever. Even if they did try for a mileage penalty it would have only been charged to the initial 200 miles, which would have hardly been worth the aggravation.

Posted

Tomorrow is 5 months from the day I took delivery. My dealer has been great to work with. I have been compensated over these 5 months accordingly but ultimately just want a Yukon Denali that drives right. Thought we had one ready to be brought to my dealer via flatbed but my Service Mgr happened to be at that location last night and drove it. Said it vibrated pretty bad so that one is out.

 

Not sure folks know but when GM does a straight buyback and gets you into another vehicle they do so at DEALER COST. My lease essentially disappears and I get all monies put down, refunded. The problem is there is a dealer about 80 miles away from me that has 2 identical Yukon's I would take but he isn't willing to sell them at dealer cost. He is willing to sell them to me at supplier pricing (about $1000 difference). He also isn't willing to trade with my dealer as he says he will sell 5 white ones to 1 black one (I came into this wanting white). The dealers hands are so tied when it comes to solving these issues (especially since there isn't a fix) and GM's hands are so tied when it comes to getting a vehicle into my hands to make this potentially go away. They have pushed for me to just order one but my concern is waiting another 2 months only for it to arrive vibrating and buffeting.

 

What. A. Ride.

Posted

My 2015i Escalade ESV with 5000 miles goes in tomorrow for a list of problems. One being the roof buffeting. I can push on the rear roof by the window easy, BUT right above the rear passengers door the WHOLE roof can be pushed in. Close the door and the whole thing jumps. This has to be where the noise is coming from. I did a GM buy back in 2008 on another Escalade. I will do it again if need be...

Posted

So, according to GM, 40 engineers working on the problem. Here's how that gets decoded:

 

1. The Engineers know what the problem is and have a fix;

2. The spreadsheet lads are saying no, no too expensive find another way;

3. The ivory tower hasn't decided who to blame and then suggest an alternative career.

Posted

Tomorrow is 5 months from the day I took delivery. My dealer has been great to work with. I have been compensated over these 5 months accordingly but ultimately just want a Yukon Denali that drives right. Thought we had one ready to be brought to my dealer via flatbed but my Service Mgr happened to be at that location last night and drove it. Said it vibrated pretty bad so that one is out.

 

Not sure folks know but when GM does a straight buyback and gets you into another vehicle they do so at DEALER COST. My lease essentially disappears and I get all monies put down, refunded. The problem is there is a dealer about 80 miles away from me that has 2 identical Yukon's I would take but he isn't willing to sell them at dealer cost. He is willing to sell them to me at supplier pricing (about $1000 difference). He also isn't willing to trade with my dealer as he says he will sell 5 white ones to 1 black one (I came into this wanting white). The dealers hands are so tied when it comes to solving these issues (especially since there isn't a fix) and GM's hands are so tied when it comes to getting a vehicle into my hands to make this potentially go away. They have pushed for me to just order one but my concern is waiting another 2 months only for it to arrive vibrating and buffeting.

 

What. A. Ride.

My dealer explained the same situation to me. Fortunately, the one they found to replace mine was from a "cooperating dealer" that they work with often, so the swap went straight through. I definitely got lucky.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...