Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have been having tranny issues on my 2013 Tahoe LT that I bought as a certified vehicle last year with 24,000 miles really like it but 2 tranny issues in less than a year and I only put on 8,000 miles since had me go back to the dealer and see what they can do on a new 2015 Tahoe. Well dealer was great to work with and the new 2015i Tahoe LT Z71 just arrived from the factory today and just go done with the test drive....so brand new build for those that think this issue if fixed....it is not!

Wow did I feel the cabin pressure and I only did 10 mile ride of speeds of 30-70mph. This is a fully loaded LT with Entertainment and Luxury package....looks awesome...rides great but now doubt I will get due to this issue! I am going back with my wife tomorrow to test again and if we feel the cabin pressure again we will pass and I guess stick with the 2013 Tahoe! Bummer but that cabin pressure and ear pressure was absolutely obnoxious! Someone mentioned maybe trying to pull the fuse for the noise canceling system....not sure about that but I guess I can try. I am going to try a 2015 Tahoe LTZ tomorrow as well as long as I am going back.

I pulled the fuse for the entire sound/infotainment system and it did not change the ear pressure/buffeting. I did hear more road and wind noise, as expected. One person (20Sierra14, I think) on this thread reported that by stuffing cotton into the three microphones, the ear pressure went away....I tried that and agin it did not resolve the ear pressure/buffeting. So, it is questionable what will work, if anything. If you can hear/feel it on the test drive, it is unlikely it will go away afterward. And since there has only been 1 person who has reported success out of several that tried and many that have reported the issue, the odds are NOT in your favour. My advice - wait another year or two, until GM figures this out ( if they ever do!).

  • Like 1
Posted

I went with the 2013 Tahoe LTZ....they gave me a great price on my trade so easy decision. My wife did not even want to get into the 2015 based on what I experienced. I will just wait for the fix down the road.....thanks for the advice from everyone on this!

Posted (edited)

I completed most of the 57 pages and think I didn't see anything on this air vent possibly being the cause of the buffeting. I don't know for sure that the new 2015 Suburbans, Tahoes, etc. have incorporated this technology for cabin venting, but if they do, I suspect this thing could be contributing to the problem.

 

http://gmauthority.com/blog/2013/02/2014-corvette-c7-first-to-use-gm-developed-lightweight-smart-material/

 

It doesn't work as intended on the new Corvettes so there's a good possibility, if it's used in these vehicles, it's a failure, too. I would suspect the cabin pressure would be oscillating quite badly if this vent was opening and closing harmonically as the vehicle was traveling down the road.

 

I offer this as a thought just in case no one else has looked in this area.

 

I'm watching here because I will be replacing my current Suburban in the near future but not until some word of the fix for this problem.

Edited by dbdave
Posted

dbdave, there was some discussion about vents previously. My own opinion is that I don't see a vent being able to "pump" enough air to cause a pressure sensation in the passengers ears, even if it was flapping open/closed or something similar that this new high tech material does. I will say, however, that I suspect the "triple seals" that GM have used on these vehicles may be playing a role in why this particulay vehicle exhibits ear pressure when other SUV's don't. I personally observed that if I crack the front windows open ever so slightly, the ear pressure went away. I could still hear the fluttering (buffeting), but the ear pressure sensation went away. NOw, it's tricky to do because the windws only have express down mode so they want to go fully open and usually when you stop it, it's already and inch or more open - then, there is a bunch of wind noise so tought o hear much over that! But on one occasaion I was fast enough to crack the window about 1/4" and worked well to eliminate the ear pressure.

 

Booming and droning sounds are nothing new to the automotive industry. As I've noted before, there are over 1000 Technical Publications in SAE alone on the topic. There are numerous causes and numerous cures. Even GM address "drone" and "boom" in several TSB's that I have stumbled accross recently. Same with Ford. I suspect same with all of them. Don't forget the media release posted about the GMC Terrain, where it talked about the boom and drone - GM knows about it all too well.

 

My daily driver is a 2009 Explorer, and since I've been dealing with the Yukon, I have noticed that it exhibits all the same boom and drone noises as the Yukon. It's another "body-on-frame" SUV; a shoe-box on wheels! HOWEVER, the difference is that it not not as severe. It only booms or drones when the road is really rough. And, even at it's worst, the droning does not seem to produce ear pressure. But let's face it - it's no where near as stiff and tightly sealed as the new generation GM Tahoe, Yukon and Suburban. Coincedence? Not likely.

 

So why are these new GM SUV's so bad? I think everything GM has done to stiffen and lighten this vehicle, along with reducing noises and sealing the cabin, all have contributed to a vehicle that is "overly sensitive" to the dreaded "boom and drone" the industry has been dealing with for years. And, it is so bad that it creates ear pressure to boot!

 

GM has their work cut out. They have to address the design for the next build, as well as figure out a fix for existing vehicles. My advise - hold off buying one until they getting it all sorted out.

  • Like 1
Posted

The dealer will try to tell you it is a 'normal operating condition of the vehicle.' That may be true, but a defect in the vehicle, and the fact that they don't know how to fix it is not a valid excuse.

 

If GM's recall department doesn't think it is a safety issue, they have another thing coming. My wife is experiencing severe headaches and vertigo since she has been driving out 2015 Suburban.

 

Our vehicle is driveable, sure....just have fun with the incessant headaches and pressure in your ears.

Posted

The recall department is going to totally ignore you. You don't take issues like that to GM...you file them with NHTSA (online). GM can ignore you until the cows come home. They cannot ignore NHTSA. Stating your issues here is informative and helpful. Stating your issues with NHTSA is actionable.

Posted

I totally believe that the buffeting and the ANC work together to create the "total sensation."

 

Our Denali has ear pressure, but has zero buffeting. This leads me to believe that if you have the buffeting, even the cotton balls won't fix the pressure. To test my idea, I started the truck and banged on the headliner... Yup, ear pressure -- from a standstill and cotton balls! This assures (to me) that the pressure itself is 110% from the ANC... If you have buffeting and ear pressure, there is no way to "trick" the system to rid the pressure. This also helps the other theory, that if you have buffeting, the pressure is enhanced. I really believe the whole situation is a "reverb" effect -- whatever is exciting the noise that the ANC is trying to cancel converts into the booming/buffeting noise everyone is hearing.

 

Again.. just my ideas and input is purely subjective :)

Posted (edited)

My 2015 Yukon XL I ordered should be in next week. After reading this, I will be taking it on an extensive test drive before I sign any papers. The only thing that worries me is some people are experiencing it after a few weeks of ownership. During my test drive I want to do my best to try and hear the noise if it is present. In order to have the highest probability of replicating the sound, I should drive around 40 mph and what else, windows up or down, ac on or off, radio on or off?

I ordered a SLT with 18" wheels, max trailering package, navi, and cross bars.

 

Thanks

Edited by badthorn
Posted

My 2015 Yukon XL I ordered should be in next week. After reading this, I will be taking it on an extensive test drive before I sign any papers. The only thing that worries me is some people are experiencing it after a few weeks of ownership. During my test drive I want to do my best to try and hear the noise if it is present. In order to do have the highest probability of replicating the sound I should drive around 40 mph and what else, windows up or down, ac on or off, radio on or off?

I ordered a SLT with 18" wheels, max trailering package, navi, and cross bars.

 

Thanks

 

Windows up, AC won't affect anything, radio off and yes, around 35-40mph... Our 1st SLT was on 20in wheels and had buffeting and ear pressure. This truck was brand new w/ 3 miles on it when we drove it 2hrs back home... We did not notice any issues on the way home, but everything started a couple days later w/ around 300miles on it.. See if your dealer is willing to do a "few-days" test drive before you sign anything.

 

Best of luck!

Posted (edited)

"I totally believe that the buffeting and the ANC work together to create the "total sensation."

 

Our Denali has ear pressure, but has zero buffeting. This leads me to believe that if you have the buffeting, even the cotton balls won't fix the pressure. To test my idea, I started the truck and banged on the headliner... Yup, ear pressure -- from a standstill and cotton balls! This assures (to me) that the pressure itself is 110% from the ANC... If you have buffeting and ear pressure, there is no way to "trick" the system to rid the pressure. This also helps the other theory, that if you have buffeting, the pressure is enhanced. I really believe the whole situation is a "reverb" effect -- whatever is exciting the noise that the ANC is trying to cancel converts into the booming/buffeting noise everyone is hearing.

 

Again.. just my ideas and input is purely subjective :)"

 

 

 

 

You're right, the cotton balls did not fix ours, which exhibits both the buffeting sounds and ear pressure. Nor did diabling the entire ANC by removing the fuse to it.

 

Question 1 for you: have you tried diabling the ANC by pulling the fuse? I would be curious if the result is the same as cotton in the microphones.

 

Question 2: Did you bang on the headliner without stating the vehicle, to compare the result when the vehicle is running? I found the boom/ear pressure to be present with or without the vehicle on when I bang on the headliner.

Edited by Wrench589
Posted (edited)

The recall department is going to totally ignore you. You don't take issues like that to GM...you file them with NHTSA (online). GM can ignore you until the cows come home. They cannot ignore NHTSA. Stating your issues here is informative and helpful. Stating your issues with NHTSA is actionable.

 

 

Please forgive my comments as I know you mean well but I've been following this thread for a long time and heard people reference contacting the NHTSA but I've never seen anything show up on their website relating to this issue. I don't even see the Service Bulletin PIT5318 that GM produced back in August 2014.

 

I noticed the death toll on the Chevy Cobalt ignition switch thing is up to 64 now. If you follow that story and the actions of both the NHTSA and GM, you'll have a good idea of what to expect from both organizations.

 

 

.

Edited by Wing350
Posted

 

"I totally believe that the buffeting and the ANC work together to create the "total sensation."

 

Our Denali has ear pressure, but has zero buffeting. This leads me to believe that if you have the buffeting, even the cotton balls won't fix the pressure. To test my idea, I started the truck and banged on the headliner... Yup, ear pressure -- from a standstill and cotton balls! This assures (to me) that the pressure itself is 110% from the ANC... If you have buffeting and ear pressure, there is no way to "trick" the system to rid the pressure. This also helps the other theory, that if you have buffeting, the pressure is enhanced. I really believe the whole situation is a "reverb" effect -- whatever is exciting the noise that the ANC is trying to cancel converts into the booming/buffeting noise everyone is hearing.

 

Again.. just my ideas and input is purely subjective :)"

 

 

 

 

You're right, the cotton balls did not fix ours, which exhibits both the buffeting sounds and ear pressure. Nor did diabling the entire ANC by removing the fuse to it.

 

Question 1 for you: have you tried diabling the ANC by pulling the fuse? I would be curious if the result is the same as cotton in the microphones.

 

Question 2: Did you bang on the headliner without stating the vehicle, to compare the result when the vehicle is running? I found the boom/ear pressure to be present with or without the vehicle on when I bang on the headliner.

 

 

1) This topic is crazy, but going back a few months, I was one of the first to try the AMP fuse pull.. It helped my situation for only a couple days, then the pressure came back. Muting the mics w/ the cotton balls has been the ONLY solution I've found to work -- and it's been working for a few months now.. No more headaches.

 

2) No, I have not tried it without the truck running.. I was trying to focus everything possible to get the ANC to "hear" the "boom" I was creating, instead of the noise the truck is making going 35-40mph. I can sure try it though. BUT, hearing your situation, this focuses the ear pressure is being produced by the ANC even more! How can a truck that isn't even rolling create pressure? Nothing is moving?!? Ahhhhh-- the ANC trying to keep the cabin nice and silent!

Posted

Here's pictures of shocks and springs. Like to find other Escalade and Denalli owners to compare what's on theirs.

 

I'm having more frustration with the low speed power issue. Driving me nuts.

post-135065-0-14323900-1427312716_thumb.jpg

post-135065-0-89406300-1427312747_thumb.jpg

post-135065-0-65446100-1427313238_thumb.jpg

post-135065-0-35828000-1427313257_thumb.jpg

post-135065-0-08498600-1427313301_thumb.jpg

post-135065-0-20301800-1427313353_thumb.jpg

post-135065-0-14323900-1427312716_thumb.jpg

post-135065-0-89406300-1427312747_thumb.jpg

post-135065-0-65446100-1427313238_thumb.jpg

post-135065-0-35828000-1427313257_thumb.jpg

post-135065-0-08498600-1427313301_thumb.jpg

post-135065-0-20301800-1427313353_thumb.jpg

post-135065-0-14323900-1427312716_thumb.jpg

post-135065-0-89406300-1427312747_thumb.jpg

post-135065-0-65446100-1427313238_thumb.jpg

post-135065-0-35828000-1427313257_thumb.jpg

post-135065-0-08498600-1427313301_thumb.jpg

post-135065-0-20301800-1427313353_thumb.jpg

post-135065-0-14323900-1427312716_thumb.jpg

post-135065-0-89406300-1427312747_thumb.jpg

post-135065-0-65446100-1427313238_thumb.jpg

post-135065-0-35828000-1427313257_thumb.jpg

post-135065-0-08498600-1427313301_thumb.jpg

post-135065-0-20301800-1427313353_thumb.jpg

Posted

 

 

Please forgive my comments as I know you mean well but I've been following this thread for a long time and heard people reference contacting the NHTSA but I've never seen anything show up on their website relating to this issue. I don't even see the Service Bulletin PIT5318 that GM produced back in August 2014.

 

I noticed the death toll on the Chevy Cobalt ignition switch thing is up to 64 now. If you follow that story and the actions of both the NHTSA and GM, you'll have a good idea of what to expect from both organizations.

 

 

.

Exactly the point Wing. NHTSA is required to track and maintain all filings. The fact you don't see any popping up is be cause only one or two have been filed! So you are exactly correct...if only a few people file, they aren't going to have the complaints online (I do know of two). You think they learned nothing over the whole Cobalt matter?

 

 

Please forgive my comments as I know you mean well but I've been following this thread for a long time and heard people reference contacting the NHTSA but I've never seen anything show up on their website relating to this issue. I don't even see the Service Bulletin PIT5318 that GM produced back in August 2014.

 

I noticed the death toll on the Chevy Cobalt ignition switch thing is up to 64 now. If you follow that story and the actions of both the NHTSA and GM, you'll have a good idea of what to expect from both organizations.

 

 

.

Exactly the point Wing. NHTSA is required to track and maintain all filings. The fact you don't see any popping up is be cause only one or two have been filed! So you are exactly correct...if only a few people file, they aren't going to have the complaints online (I do know of two). You think they learned nothing over the whole Cobalt matter?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,479 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...