Jump to content

It is here! New 3500!


Recommended Posts

Posted

Wow! Do you transport campers or something? Looks great!

 

We have a family farm, and a 38' gooseneck trailer we built from a 48' flatbed. The Gooseneck is heavy, and we use it for the farm, as well as hauling scrap construction equipment tracks for some extra cash flow. My father currently uses his 2002 Chevrolet 2500 for this, but the Dually should do it even better.

 

As promised, here are some more pictures: (it is overcast here today, so the pictures are a bit dark)

 

2014-08-17_10-49-13_705_zpsc5537cf6.jpg

 

2014-08-17_10-49-19_817_zpsccd72f2c.jpg

 

2014-08-17_10-50-37_629_zps619e9376.jpg

 

2014-08-17_10-50-16_434_zps47f0b029.jpg

 

The dealer owes me a pair of the 6" chrome running boards still. They should be in this week. Then I will add a bed liner, a B&W turnover ball hitch, and tool box, and she will be ready for some hard work. What are some of the opinions on the different bedliners out there?

Posted

I am happy with my line-x. Has held up well. It gets worked

 

161ad01342a6f46c90817cc40fcb8673.jpg

 

 

Ryan

Posted

I was leaning in that direction Ryan. Did you have it sprayed in, or did you do it yourself? It looks like it has held up well.

Posted

The Line-X liners are spray in.

 

I will be in the minority on this (maybe the only one) but I like having a plastic bedliner. Have one in my 2006 and my 1990 had one as well. You can hit a plastic bedliner with a hammer and it won't dent it. They are very tough, not much can really hurt them. To put in a spray in liner the paint has to be roughed up, and then the liner applied. I have heard a few horror stories about overspray and the liner not bonding properly, but this isn't the norm. I like the plastic liners because they are not permanent and can be removed (and put in) easily. It's also easy to slide heavy objects on the plastic liner. Most have fairly deep ridges to let water drain and hold the cargo out of it. They will not scuff cargo either. Some people say that they will ruin the paint underneath, try getting a spray in liner off and see what the paint looks like! The bed on my 1990 was the only part of the pickup that wasn't rusty. The plastic liners are also a huge deal compared to the spray ins. They aren't for everyone, but I like mine. If I bought a pickup with a spray in, I would put a plastic liner on top.

Posted

I would have to say get the Line X, mine has held up great and i do use my truck for work. I like that you have full use of the the bed the drop in liners rob to much bed space in my opinion and i have never had an issue getting something heavy out of the bed. Also your truck is sweet.

Posted

You can see my LineX spray in liner. It's 1000 time better then the drop in one it had at the lot. Loaded it up for camping this week the filled the back with wood when we go there. Just hosed it out and it looks new again.

 

10496177_10152136082566525_8672651462494

Posted

Awesome truck! Another vote for Line-X. Two years in and it still looks like new and hasn't worn at all. :cheers:

Posted

I had a dealer do mine. Day after unpicked up my truck

 

 

Ryan

Posted

Thank you everyone for the advice! I was thinking of maybe doing a hybrid, Linex on the sides and maybe the Weathertech bed liner on the floor? That way it gives some cushion, but has the Linex on the sides?

 

I have my running boards now, just need to take some pictures of it.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,791
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    d.lowrey
    Newest Member
    d.lowrey
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 4,078 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Just did an injector/HPFP replacement on Pepper at 192,400 miles; close enough to 200K, RIGHT? (If 200K is considered life end and to me it isn't). But hey, to each his own.    Have never run a catch can on this vehicle. Back side of every valve looked like a new valve spray painted semigloss black. Port walls looked 'neat' (all a normal result of passive EGR via VVT) Zero build up even in AFM cylinders. Just color. It uses no measurable oil and never has.    At 155,000 I put her on E-85 and a borescope of the cylinders at plug change showed very clean pistons and valve faces. The replaced injector tips looked new. (It was the pump piston seal that was leaking). Oh well, have six good backups.    Still gets 28 mpg on gas (highway average) and over 20 (highway) on alky. UOA's look good and runs as good now as it did when I bought it. Better in fact.    What improvement would a Catch Can provide this motor?     And given all this I expect that IF I installed one I'd see some water/gas/oil vapor accumulation. Byproducts of normal combustion.   Having said that, IF my motor used an appreciable amount of oil I'd consider it a useful 'crutch' until I had the situation corrected OR if bore polished, until I junked it or rebuilt it to stave off repeated plug fouling.    I'm not telling you what I THINK. But what its DONE.          
    • Love the look. I'm a SCSB lover myself.    Two items. 1.) A spacer changes scrub radius but this also changes when we use wheels of different offsets. A little isn't a big deal. 2.) Steel wheels, alloy wheels all have different thickness. Same effect on the stud and lug nut as a spacer. When hub centric the wheel isn't supported by the stud. It's supported by the hub. The stud just keeps it all together.  
    • I had a evap sol go bad a couple weeks ago. . I replaced it.  While watching live data at the time I saw I had some cylinder 1 misfires. No MIL but on live data I could see ~50 at startup and about 70 more after an hour a drive all on cyl 1.  I also noticed that the LTFT were -5% to -15% always.  And that bank 2 is always -3% richer than bank 1. Even across all driving modes, city, highway, etc it’s always 3% richer than bank 1. So I start with the misfire. Swapped coil, plug, and plug wires from 1 to 3. No follow. I got an Injector reseal kit, pulled the D/s injector rail, swapped #1 and #3 injectors, resealed them, reinstalled and retested.  The misfire followed to 3. So I ordered and replaced all 8 injectors, spark plugs, and plug wires. Also replaced the 1 time use fuel pipes under the intake manifold.  Injectors that were in the truck since new were  Part # 12668390.  I replaced them with # 12742701 Got from RockAuto. Pretty certain they’re genuine and the correct ones. I called a friend at a parts store who told me “the 12742701 were the correct superseded part # for the originals I was replacing”. So started truck after replacing all that and it’s running -15 - -30 LTFTs. I reset the fuel trims with GDS2 and drove it for a 60 miles trip each way. There have been no changes in the LTFTs.  I checked if the HPFP was leaking into the crankcase. I removed the pvc and watched the trims. No difference.  I checked the alcohol content and it was at 10%  I’m out of ideas here. Truck seems to run great. Just always rich on the fuel trims.  Anyone with any help or ideas would be greatly appreciated.  I ran an injector balance test just for the heck of it and it came back this. I’m confused.  I have gds2 and some other diag tools if anyone knows of anything I should test next.
    • Definitely needs to go back to the dealer. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...