Jump to content

Torn between lowering and lifting....


Recommended Posts

Posted

I have had several trucks and always have had lifted trucks lately. This 14' being my dd I don't think I wanna go like I use to. My 13 had 7.5" lift and 35's.

 

One truck I miss dearly was my Silverado SS. Sporty truck but was still awd for the boat ramps.

 

Which direction to go is the question. Level with 33's or just lower and debadge it as it sits.

 

My truck 14.

5.3L

3.08 gears

Muffler mod, rear block is already gone, 20" wheels and High country bumpers.

 

 

image_zpsecc371cd.jpeg

  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Here's my vote:

 

gypa6equ.jpg

 

etasavag.jpg

 

That does look good. I even have a set of 305/55/20 terra grapplers I could run on stock wheels for a bit to see if I liked that lift.

 

Then again one downside is I have 3.08's A tune would help I know but I feel the truck would still struggle.

Posted

MMMMMM.... Lowered Z71 ?, I think it looks real good as is for a daily driver. You'll probably regret all the money you would spend to lower it, not like it and then put it back. Im just thinking nobody would want to buy a "used ,lowered Z71" Just sayin'.

Posted

Lowered trucks are cool, but Lifted trucks are cooler.

 

FYI tho, you may feel a little sluggish with 33's and 3.08's.

Posted

Looks good the way it is, but not a fan of climbing to get in my truck. Did it once been level or lower ever since. So I guess Im one of the only that would buy a slightly lowered Z71. Most of my work is off road.

Posted

I lowered my 4WD High Country 2" front and 3-1/4" rear for $88 bucks (+ alignment)... Can't get much cheaper than that. As a matter of fact, I believe even the level cost more than that. And the way I did it nothing is "cut" and can very easily go back to stock, it took me by myself 2 1/2 hours to lower it, I figure I could raise it back up in less than that. When my factory Goodyears wear out I plan to level it and run 34's. It'll be like getting a new truck again LOL

 

With 3.08 gears, I'd tend to lean more towards lowering it.

 

20140811_090126-1_zpsb48c3fbf.jpg

Posted

I lowered my 4WD High Country 2" front and 3-1/4" rear for $88 bucks (+ alignment)... Can't get much cheaper than that. As a matter of fact, I believe even the level cost more than that. And the way I did it nothing is "cut" and can very easily go back to stock, it took me by myself 2 1/2 hours to lower it, I figure I could raise it back up in less than that. When my factory Goodyears wear out I plan to level it and run 34's. It'll be like getting a new truck again LOL

 

With 3.08 gears, I'd tend to lean more towards lowering it.

 

20140811_090126-1_zpsb48c3fbf.jpg

 

How is the ride? I think I saw a post you used the rought country lower on the front but what about the rear?

Posted

How can you be torn? You either need to lift it, or you don't. Clearly you don't need it lifted, if you only need 4wd for a boat launch. I sure as hell would't lift mine unless I had to. I don't get people doing up these pavement princesses with mud tires. Had to say it, sorry.

Posted

How can you be torn? You either need to lift it, or you don't. Clearly you don't need it lifted, if you only need 4wd for a boat launch. I sure as hell would't lift mine unless I had to. I don't get people doing up these pavement princesses with mud tires. Had to say it, sorry.

 

Purely for Aesthetics.

 

My 13 was a mall crawler for sure. Now my duramax wasn't but that was a completly different build.

Posted

Well either way, the above comment, I agree with. Lowering a 4x4 makes no sense. I don't think you can go wrong with at least a level.

Posted

Rides great! Compression is no different at all from the factory ride, the rebound is shorter, but it's got to be a pretty serious hump/dip in the road to notice it. The rear rides just as it did from the factory, but can hit the bump stops on some of the bigger humps/dips. Honestly, it drives just as it did from the factory on a daily basis.

 

I did use Rough Country's 2" drop in the front that remounts the lower strut mount. Used MCGaughey's 2" drop shackle and removed the factory 1-1/4" block.

Posted

While I like the look of a lifted truck, I left mine alone. Why? It rides great as is and It's a 4WD that is easily gotten into with any step bars. Even my 6 year old granddaughter can get in by herself. Why mess with it? I do very little off road.

Posted

Leave it as is. Best of both worlds if you don't require either a lift or lowering. Plus, you'll have more money in your pocket for whores.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,943
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Dom Colussi
    Newest Member
    Dom Colussi
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 693 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  
    • They’re not the same wiz as 10-15 years ago.  QC has fallen pretty hard.  The XP line was never good though in the first place.    https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/wix-filter-rusted-through.386492/post-6991372   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/i-ve-used-my-last-wix-filter.27299/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/looking-for-a-better-replacement-for-wix-51258.403977/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/convince-me-in-using-the-purolator-boss.401537/post-7420147   the forums are littered with posts and examples of not great wix filters the last couple years 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...