Jump to content

HID vs. LED

OilfieldTrash78

Recommended Posts

OilfieldTrash78 Enthusiast

OilfieldTrash78

Posted
Posted

Have a TRS HID kit at home waiting to be installed once I get off the rig, but I have been reading alot, and it seems there are alot of people that are liking the LED kits. SO, I can't decide if I should go with the HID's I have, or sell them, and get a LED kit. I need something that is going to be reliable, and but out better light from the stock Sierra projectors. Any input, personal experiences would be greatly appreciated.

Mike1220 Senior Enthusiast

Mike1220

Posted
Posted

I've gone through almost every option for lighting; in stock projector: OEM halogen, 55W HIDs, and 45W VLED LMZ LEDs; now I have an FXR 3.0 w/ 50W 4300K HIDs

 

I think we all know how incredible the OEM halogens are so I don't need to same much about them except for that the whole idea of a halogen projector on a $50K truck should've been scrapped.

55W 5000K HIDs from DDM tuning in stock projectors were great, worked well, but still didn't light up the sides of the roads as much as the HIDs and in the projector headlights on my 02 Yukon, so I wasn't happy but I was satisfied enough to keep them. Then one day my HIDs decided to cr@p out on me with perfect timing cause I was 15 minutes into a 2 hour road trip, so I was glad I had just put in some Rigid Ind DOT approved pods cause they got me the rest of the way.

07D3CAF9-4117-4BFE-A749-D96D2F398282_zps

 

I then placed an order for VLED LMZ LEDs, got them in, they are great lights as well, BUT, if you want to get the best width, then you don't get the best distance, and vice versa

I have a tinted windshield, 45% over stock 70% so I'm at about 32% VLT, so the best light possible is very important to me

A few weeks ago I opened my headlights and used the FXR adapter bracket from Fastheadlights to install an FXR projector, man is this an improvement! This is the projector that these trucks should've come with from the factory!

7CBB4252-EAF4-4486-844B-5E5129A5E99E_zps

 

Don't have a shot of the LMZs at the same place, but the FXR and 55W HIDs were taken with the truck in the same position but the headlight adjustment was a bit higher when I took the HID pic since it had never been adjusted after getting the level kit. I made adjustments when I got home after taking the pics.

 

The HIDs in stock projector vs FXR, is there a HUGE difference in light output? No. Is there a huge difference in how much better the light is dispersed, projected (useful light at distance), and overall better road clarity? YES. I have had my tinted windshield through all the options, halogen, HIDs, LED, and now FXRs, and until the FXRs I never felt comfortable driving without having both my headlights, and fog lights on. Now with the FXRs I hardly notice when I turn the fog lights on [emoji16] and I feel as though I can see the road clearly in any condition

 

 

To sum all this up, if you can, DO THE RETROFIT! You won't be sorry! I'm actually getting ready to do 2 sets of Sierra headlights, one I'm doing everything I've done to mine, and the other will be just a retrofit. Both are for local people who have seen my lights haha.

Mike1220 Senior Enthusiast

Mike1220

Posted
Posted

I don't believe in the output out of a LED inside of a projector, myself.

The LMZs are pretty impressive in the FXR projectors, far better than they are in the OEM projectors. Can't beat an HID but not far behind them IMO (only in the FXR projector)

Roidz Enthusiast

Roidz

Posted
Posted

I started with LEDs and changed them out the same day to HIDs after having issues with the LEDs not being plug n play and needing a capacitor in order for them to work properly.

 

I didn't feel comfortable with doing the retrofit as I'm not sure I'm handy enough for it, but from what Mike and everyone else I've heard say, the retrofit will give you the best light. I don't have a tinted windshield (yet) so i wasn't as worried about that aspect of it. So far I'm liking my HIDs. Much, much better than stock.

 

But anyway, to sum it up: if you're handy enough to tackle the retrofit I would go that route, if not, HIDs.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6+

Victor Ferreira Enthusiast

Victor Ferreira

Posted
Posted

Well, before the truck I had a 2004 BMW with stock Bi-Xenons, and I totally felt the downgrade when I turned on the stock halogens in the truck. Put LMZ 5000k bulbs in there, I'm a happy camper. Is it as good as the OEM BMW lights (albeit 10 year old ones)? No. But it's almost just as good, and with that I'm satisfied. Install was much simpler than that of an HID kid, and I quite like the "instant on/off" capacity of LED's.

 

On a sidenote though, I avoided HID kits because I've just always had bad luck with them. I had three cars with them before, and one went through 2 ballasts, the next one through 3 bulbs, and the third one actually had a ballast catch on fire. Luckily I had an extinguisher in the car.

morrislee Enthusiast

morrislee

Posted
Posted

LMZ will not do much good in projectors for the tests I have seen so far. Because the properties of them shooting left and right only, they make great fog lights.

 

LEDs should best be used in refractors, not reflectors. example would be the F150 2015 using LED in a big lens to distribute light, the diode has to be facing the direction of travel, not left to right or 360, these designes are to simulate halogen bulbs, but never good enough.

nando87 Enthusiast

nando87

Posted
Posted

Stock Silverado housing with LED bulbs only, plug and play.... I know you have a Sierra but this is just to show you the light output from LED's.

 

DSC_0507_zps3umzmujt.jpg

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined

  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 382 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • nfisherman
      Software Update

      By nfisherman · Posted

      Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...