Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, steve76t said:

so far I like them.  Haven't had any snow to really see how they perform there, but on the road they are fairly quiet & smooth.  They are a little stiffer than the stock Goodyear Eagle LS-2s.  Those were really a grand touring car tire & not made for dirt or snow.  

they are definitely a front runner for me. i had ls2s on my 2007 sierra when i first got that back in the day and they are a terrible tire for snow/ice and compacted snow. i live in north dakota so a good winter tire is a must. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Herms21 said:

they are definitely a front runner for me. i had ls2s on my 2007 sierra when i first got that back in the day and they are a terrible tire for snow/ice and compacted snow. i live in north dakota so a good winter tire is a must. 

In that case, yes the BFGs should be a great choice as they have a very good reputation for snowy conditions.  The other option, which I was also considering, would be the Goodyear Duratrac.  They don't offer that tire in a 285/55r20 size which is one reason I went the with BFG.   

Posted
9 minutes ago, steve76t said:

In that case, yes the BFGs should be a great choice as they have a very good reputation for snowy conditions.  The other option, which I was also considering, would be the Goodyear Duratrac.  They don't offer that tire in a 285/55r20 size which is one reason I went the with BFG.   

i like the duratracs as well. they are a second choice for me and possibly the cooper stt pro. there is a tire that seems to be a knock off of the duratracs which are the kanati trail hog but unsure if they are offered in that size i guess. can’t fond much on them from people that have run them otherwise i’d maybe give them a try myself. 

Posted

May have the same or similar tread pattern, but the rubber compound has a lot to do with the mountain/snowflake rating.  Don't know if the Kanati tires have that or not. 

 

Don't know how important that is in N Dakota, but going over the Sierra passes often have chain controls and CalTrans stops get very picky about what tires can continue on the hwys without chains. They'll close the roads before requiring 4wd's with snowtires to chain up.

Posted
9 minutes ago, steve76t said:

May have the same or similar tread pattern, but the rubber compound has a lot to do with the mountain/snowflake rating.  Don't know if the Kanati tires have that or not. 

 

Don't know how important that is in N Dakota, but going over the Sierra passes often have chain controls and CalTrans stops get very picky about what tires can continue on the hwys without chains. They'll close the roads before requiring 4wd's with snowtires to chain up.

don’t believe they have that rating. it’s one of those things where “you get what you pay for” i imagine. bought cheaper knock offs in my younger days but have learned my lesson. 

 

really no regulations here in nodak other than if you run studded tires; which i have never encountered anyone that does, to have them off by a certain date. here it’s kind of use your own judgment and if you’re stupid enough to go out in bad conditions you get what you deserve and traffic fines will be handed out if it gets to the point where interstate has been shut down. 

 

my brother runs the ko2s on his vehicles and has had nothing but good things to say about them. his see a lot of gravel and they wear quite well for him and perform well in the winter. 

Posted
5 hours ago, Herms21 said:

really no regulations here in nodak other than if you run studded tires; which i have never encountered anyone that does, to have them off by a certain date. here it’s kind of use your own judgment and if you’re stupid enough to go out in bad conditions you get what you deserve and traffic fines will be handed out if it gets to the point where interstate has been shut down. 

 

Wish it were like that around here.  There are lots of idiot drivers from CA that have not clue how to drive in the snow.  CalTrans and Cali's CHP have to monitor the idiots and have ridiculous rules when driving over the mountains.  Most of the time requiring chains before snow even starts sticking to the streets.   Luckily I'm in NV and don't see them everyday.  Just when I want to go skiing or going over the hills to visit family in the Sacramento area. 

Posted
On 5/27/2017 at 10:48 PM, 6TEEN5.3 said:

Not lifted just leveled.

 

33 ridge grapplers on stockers

 

6c66b155b8533967b0451efe8a67ff7f.jpg

 

fe67fe989674110dd242d93f1fde6330.jpg

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Is that a 285/70/17 or the 285/75/17 I’ve been trying to figure out if I can run the 285/75/17 with a 2.5 rc kit on my factory wheels 

Posted
Is that a 285/70/17 or the 285/75/17 I’ve been trying to figure out if I can run the 285/75/17 with a 2.5 rc kit on my factory wheels 

 

 

They’re 33x12.50r17. Pretty much the same height as the 285/70 but wider. I swapped the 33s for 315/70r17 and only rub the wheel liner

 

674da694d1bbdaa69137e162aeb797f3.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, 6TEEN5.3 said:

 

 


They’re 33x12.50r17. Pretty much the same height as the 275/70 but wider. I swapped the 33s for 315/70r17 and only rub the wheel liner

674da694d1bbdaa69137e162aeb797f3.jpg

 

 

Ok thanks man the 315s look to be about an inch taller and wider than what I’m going with, so you believe they will work with the 285/75 or 33.86x11.25

Posted
Ok thanks man the 315s look to be about an inch taller and wider than what I’m going with, so you believe they will work with the 285/75 or 33.86x11.25



I’m sure they’ll will be fine. These work for me but I’m not gonna be jumping ditches and whatnot
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Got into a new 2017 1500 All-Terrain earlier last year and just getting around to a lift. There are two shops close by that claim it would be near impossible to run a Zone 6.5 or anything similar with my stock 20x9s and 34/35 inch treads. Is this just a lazy approach by the shop

 

I don't remember having such an issue with my 2014 that had 18" stockers, besides running spacers. Am I just barking up the wrong tree as far as the shops or am I missing something?

Posted
Got into a new 2017 1500 All-Terrain earlier last year and just getting around to a lift. There are two shops close by that claim it would be near impossible to run a Zone 6.5 or anything similar with my stock 20x9s and 34/35 inch treads. Is this just a lazy approach by the shop
 
I don't remember having such an issue with my 2014 that had 18" stockers, besides running spacers. Am I just barking up the wrong tree as far as the shops or am I missing something?

I think they are full of it I think the stock 20's would work fine.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Posted

Here is mine 2014 Silverado Motofab 2.5" front 2" rear on stock LTZ wheels with 305/55/20 (33x12.50) Falken wildpeak at3w d52fbcde455efd6cf59d5448b2b21347.jpg45380a2e3b56c7aae36db256decc5e9e.jpg

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, 14 Silvy said:


I think they are full of it I think the stock 20's would work fine.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Stock backspacing should be roughly 6" (6.06" for the sticklers). Zone states that 5.75" of backspace as the limit for running 35x12.50 on a 20" rim. So looks like a 1" spacer all around should do the trick?

Posted (edited)

post-178256-0-52721700-1507075773_thumb.jpegpost-178256-0-38341600-1507075798_thumb.jpegpost-178256-0-23509700-1507075758_thumb.jpegIf you have +27 stock 20’s put in a 1/2” spacer and you will be fine. I have a zone 4.5 with 33’s. No rubbing whatsoever. I just won a 6” BDS from Custom Offsets and they said I can run 35’s with this setup with no rubbing. Good luck.  You’ll have a whole new truck once it’s lifted 

Edited by Daug207
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...