Jump to content

Calipers.


Herd Thinners

Recommended Posts

Posted

They used to be PBR. Not sure if they still use them

Posted

In the 05-07(havent looked at a 900 or k2) it was marked with PBR's logo on the back side of the calipers pretty much between the pistons.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

The 2014's have Akebono calipers and rotors. Not sure if this is true for the 2015's.

 

With all the outsourcing, I guess it's no surprise that a well known company that makes brakes is a supplier to GM. But, the K2 caliper single sided piston design is classic GM. I think I read that the SS Camaro has optional Brembo brakes.

Posted

You only get the optional Brembo brakes on the Camaro if you opt for the SS package with the V8.

Posted

You only get the optional Brembo brakes on the Camaro if you opt for the SS package with the V8.

 

Yeah, saw that. There's a couple of them in the parking lot at work.

Posted

For 2016 camaros brembo brakes comes standard on all models. Though I assume the ss version would have bigger rotors

Posted

Someone could always try to mount a set and see if they work. What bugs me is the manufactures are starting to cheap out on the Brembo option. Usually they only do the fronts and leave the rears as the cheap ole cast ones. They don't look symmetrical when they do it that way.

 

I know when I had my G8 GXP the mod to do was to move the Brembo calipers from the CTS-V gen 2 rears over to our cars. Not that you needed the extra stopping power but to complete the look.

Posted

Before I bought the Wilwoods, I was thinking of taking some 2500 front calipers and rotors and machining the bracket and hat section to adapt them.

Posted

That is nice Jenna, maybe GM is finally listening to some degree. Nice to see the SS got them, means the G8 cars should be able to swap them pretty easy then since they are the same car with only the sheet metal being different.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,858
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    mark2
    Newest Member
    mark2
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 505 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • No doubt, I definitely agree with you. However, considering the 6.2 and 3.0 have been catastrophically failing with very little miles, I figured I would put trouble free. I’m at 18,4xx and still not a single issue.  
    • It’s never dry here but it gets hot. My 4 vehicles I keep at home drive an 18 mile loop. One 6 days a week. Two about 3 days each and one once a month. Only one goes on trips about 4 times a year 1000 to 2000 miles each time. One 26 years old gets driven once a month for 22 years. One 14 years old goes 6 days a week. The other two are recent at 2 and 4 years. All are performing normal no extra service other than that would be half of recommended or severe service in the maintenance manual. No extra water or steam out the exhaust or premature plug wear. I would consider an 18 mile loop would be enough. So apparently once a month at 18 miles for 22 years has kept the collector car running well. About 45 minutes a month. 
    • It is working as designed.  NHT and non NHT trucks have the same exact transmission cooling setup.  NHT just gets a larger radiator.     The transmission cooler loop on these is as follows.     -Transmission out goes into an oil to water heat exchanger (item #1 in the first illustration below).  This exchanger has engine coolant opposite the transmission fluid and uses engine coolant to warm and then regulate the transmission fluid temperature when its in the operating window.   - From the cooler it goes to a thermal bypass valve (item #11 in the 2nd illustration below).  If the ATF has not reached the temp to open the bypass (194F), it loops back.   - When it reaches 194F, the thermostat opens and ATF then flows out to the oil to air auxiliary cooler (item #17 in the 2nd illustration) at the front of the truck.  From there it goes back to the transmission.     Your only fix would be to swap for the PPE thermal bypass delete block which will open the loop to the aux cooler all the time.  It will STILL run warm, probably 170-200F, but that's as low as you'll get it as its still flowing through the oil to water exchanger.      
    • Most say the oil temperature needs to above the boiling point of water to rid it of moisture and long enough to dry it. Many think that is about a hour at 212 F or more. Those people have never line dried cloths in a Midwest winter. Leave a pan of water sitting on the counter and eventually it all evaporates. So heat drives the time it takes. Water in oil under 175 F, the Nitration initiation temperature, is a minimum then for temperature and samples I've done that use Karl Fisher method say about a hour (in a healthy well tuned motor) over 175 F will dry it to under 800 ppm. Low enough to not be much of a factor. Motors with weak rings will take longer and the colder the air temperature the longer it takes.   On a cold motor there is also the condensation temperature. Blowby gases that contain moisture are subject to that cold cylinder wall, like sweat on a glass of ice tea. But also subject to the Law of Partial Pressures. Wear studies by GM and the DOD  indicate wear is a real issue below 85 F and a concern to 140 F but doesn't become a minimal factor until about 160 F. You know this intuitively when you see water vapor exit the exhaust pipe until the system gets above the dew point. It isn't magic, it's physics and it fascinates me. I know you didn't ask but....I over share sometimes. 😉    You keep the Camaro's high and tight.  
    • Move further away.   Benefit of living out - none of our cars get short cycled, plenty of warm up time.   Curious how much time/temperature it takes to drive moisture/condensation out of the engine?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...