Jump to content

Buying 2016 All Terrain - What factory accessories/options do I need?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey guys - New guy here. I'll post an intro thread in the correct forum after this.

 

Yesterday I put a deposit on a 2016 Sierra 5.3 All Terrain "Premium". I'm kind of in a lucky position as I'm out of town all next week, which gives me some time to think about the truck and what it may need or not need from the factory before I take delivery.

 

So my question to guys is - Are there any factory accessories or options I need to consider? As for options, I think it has just about everything.

 

I'm in Michigan, so the truck is going to see some weather and take a bit of a beating. It will be used as a daily as well as for work (lots of LONG road trips ~ 20-40k miles a year).

 

What i have on the list so far:

 

- Camper Shell (need for work)

- Power retractable running boards

- Weather mats

- Teflon coating? Is it worth it?

 

Any gurus know anything out there I must have?

 

Thank for your help!

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Mud flaps

 

Don't do the dealer coatings. There are much better options (coatings/sealants/wax) out there

 

 

Ryan

Posted

Weathertech floor mats. Also the weathertech headlight stick on film works good to stop the sand blasting of headlights in the winter. I have had 3 sets of amp retractable running boards, and they all failed. I would really go with the 6" factory running boards, plus they stop rocks, sand and salt from beating the rockers and doors in the winter.

Posted

Weathertech floor mats. Also the weathertech headlight stick on film works good to stop the sand blasting of headlights in the winter. I have had 3 sets of amp retractable running boards, and they all failed. I would really go with the 6" factory running boards, plus they stop rocks, sand and salt from beating the rockers and doors in the winter.

The non-retractable ones?

Posted

Yup. Just my personal opinion as far as winter road debris protection goes.

Posted

Yup. Just my personal opinion as far as winter road debris protection goes.

Cool thanks. Good call on the headlight protection. Doesn't look like weathertech makes them for the 2016 Sierra yet, but Lamin-X does. Definitely will pick some up.

Posted

I prefer the 6" rectangulars and the moulded mud flaps as well.

 

(for protection from debris, and they make the frame rails less obvious)

 

Are you stuck on the all terrain? You're expecting a lot of miles, and Z71 may not ride quite as nice as a non-z71 4wd, and z71 is part of the AT package.

 

SLT or SLE?

Double cab or crew?

 

SLT crew will have the 8 speed with either 5.3 or 6.2.

SLT double only gets the 8 speed with the 6.2.

Looks like SLE always gets the 6 speed.

 

Is what you will carry under the cap heavy? Would it fit under a tonneau?

 

Do you like tow mirrors?

Posted

POWER running boards may be nice , but I take 6" oem boards . ( winter time - road salt , sand ) and my rocker panels are line-x (black truck) .

Posted

I work in agriculture, and in the south it rains alot. The 2 sets of Amps I had never failed, even when caked in mud. I would recommend them.

 

A decent set of tires should be on the list though, as the GM supplied tires are crap.

 

Window tint, leveling kit, floor mats, bedliner; those are my must haves.

 

 

 

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Posted

I work in agriculture, and in the south it rains alot. The 2 sets of Amps I had never failed, even when caked in mud. I would recommend them.

A decent set of tires should be on the list though, as the GM supplied tires are crap.

Window tint, leveling kit, floor mats, bedliner; those are my must haves.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Mud is a lot different then corrosive salt and ice balls that weigh 50 lbs. hanging off of the boards. Each set worked for one winter then shit the bed. For $1000 a set they should last better. The components they use could be better, as they would probably last longer.

Posted

In the cold power running boards get iced up and burn the motors out sometimes. A local dealer started putting a switch in the system to turn them off in winter which defeats owning them. I get the flat style factory ones everytime. 3m on the hood and front bumper to prevent rock chips is a good idea as well.

Posted

I live in Michigan also, mudflaps are a must; Wasn't fun seeing snow caked in between the door and running boards from the front tires. Weathertech floor mats are a must also, the OEM ones are a joke and barely cover the carpet.

 

If you can negotiate enough off the price, bilstein 5100 shocks are 100% worth it (I just put the rears on tonight) especially with the roads we have in Michigan. I compressed the OEM shocks after I took them off and you could hear / feel the fluid almost frozen/crystallized at 32F outside.

 

 

A few things to note while test driving:

1.) Also make sure you are okay with the Idle when its 100% warmed up (210 Degrees). It runs at 500 RPM and can be rough.

2.) when its in v4 mode with enough throttle to "bog" the engine down it can be felt.

3.) Tire pressure - Since its cold the pressure might be low making it have a "smoother" ride.

 

If you notice 1 and 2 and it bugs you, you'll probably end up buying a tuner at some point.

Posted

I prefer the 6" rectangulars and the moulded mud flaps as well.

 

(for protection from debris, and they make the frame rails less obvious)

 

Are you stuck on the all terrain? You're expecting a lot of miles, and Z71 may not ride quite as nice as a non-z71 4wd, and z71 is part of the AT package.

 

SLT or SLE?

Double cab or crew?

 

SLT crew will have the 8 speed with either 5.3 or 6.2.

SLT double only gets the 8 speed with the 6.2.

Looks like SLE always gets the 6 speed.

 

Is what you will carry under the cap heavy? Would it fit under a tonneau?

 

Do you like tow mirrors?

 

Thanks for the reply! I am stuck on the All Terrain is that particular truck was 20% off sticker (holiday incentive). Can't really mess with that! It's an SLT Crew Cab with the 5.3 and 8-speed.

 

There is a chance I could work with just the tonneau. Won't know until I work with the truck for a bit.

 

I know nothing about tow mirrors, and as of now, not planning on towing anything unless I cough up money for a boat in the near future.

 

 

I live in Michigan also, mudflaps are a must; Wasn't fun seeing snow caked in between the door and running boards from the front tires. Weathertech floor mats are a must also, the OEM ones are a joke and barely cover the carpet.

 

If you can negotiate enough off the price, bilstein 5100 shocks are 100% worth it (I just put the rears on tonight) especially with the roads we have in Michigan. I compressed the OEM shocks after I took them off and you could hear / feel the fluid almost frozen/crystallized at 32F outside.

 

 

A few things to note while test driving:

1.) Also make sure you are okay with the Idle when its 100% warmed up (210 Degrees). It runs at 500 RPM and can be rough.

2.) when its in v4 mode with enough throttle to "bog" the engine down it can be felt.

3.) Tire pressure - Since its cold the pressure might be low making it have a "smoother" ride.

 

If you notice 1 and 2 and it bugs you, you'll probably end up buying a tuner at some point.

 

Thanks for the reply! The truck comes with Rancho shocks as part of the Z71 package. Are these the same ones you had issues with? I won't be driving the truck again until I pick it up, but it's definitely not going to stay stock! A tuner was on the list. Any you recommend?

Posted

I would at getting a bedliner as well. The spray ins are nice but pricey. Also a bug deflector for the front and some Husky or Weathertech floor liners.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I would at getting a bedliner as well. The spray ins are nice but pricey. Also a bug deflector for the front and some Husky or Weathertech floor liners.

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's got a spray in currently ?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...