Jump to content

1500 Denali vs. 2500HD Denali Differences


Recommended Posts

Posted

I am considering switching from my 2015 1500 Denali 6.2 to a 2016 2500HD Denali Duramax. I am trying to figure out some of the key differences. I know the powertrain will be completely different. I am mostly thinking of the features and accessories.

 

I know the 2500HD doesn't have magnetic ride, which I will miss.

 

The GMC website says the 2016 has projector headlights with HID bulbs. That sounds nice. Not sure if it would be better or worse than the LEDs in the new 1500s, but if they are true HIDs they will be better than the halogens we have in the 2015s.

 

Remote locking tailgate.

 

Wireless charging and upgraded radio system.

 

Is there anything else major that you lose or gain between the two trucks?

 

The closest dealership is almost 100 miles away so an in-person comparison is not really feasible.

Posted

The headlights are the same as what is on your '15 Danali as the '16 HD are just a carryover, I expect we will see the new headlights used on then for '17.

 

You will definitely want to test drive the HD as it is night and day different then the 1/2ton.

 

You will really like the power steering on the HD as it has a lot of assist on the '16's making it steer very easy in parking lots which is nice with the heavy truck.

Posted

The headlights are the same as what is on your '15 Danali as the '16 HD are just a carryover, I expect we will see the new headlights used on then for '17.

 

You will definitely want to test drive the HD as it is night and day different then the 1/2ton.

 

You will really like the power steering on the HD as it has a lot of assist on the '16's making it steer very easy in parking lots which is nice with the heavy truck.

 

I agree it's mostly a carryover. However they definitely could not legally advertise "HID bulbs" if that part didn't change. The 2015 1500 Denali has standard cheap halogen LL bulbs. I know it's not the new LED bulbs but something had to change.

post-141141-0-39275400-1452449757.jpg

post-141141-0-91218200-1452449764.jpg

post-141141-0-39275400-1452449757.jpg

post-141141-0-91218200-1452449764.jpg

post-141141-0-39275400-1452449757.jpg

post-141141-0-91218200-1452449764.jpg

post-141141-0-39275400-1452449757.jpg

post-141141-0-91218200-1452449764.jpg

Posted

I test drove my 1500 right after driving a 2500 Dmax and that made my decision easy. Since my boat is not real heavy I did not need a diesel but if I do go bigger I would get one. 2500 HD trucks drive like a rock no matter what brand unless you get some weight in the bed. The 6.2 is a lot more peppy unless you delete and tune the Dmax. As far as I know, you can only get the 2500 in a 6'6" bed so it will be a little longer.

Posted

I am considering switching from my 2015 1500 Denali 6.2 to a 2016 2500HD Denali Duramax. I am trying to figure out some of the key differences. I know the powertrain will be completely different. I am mostly thinking of the features and accessories.

 

I know the 2500HD doesn't have magnetic ride, which I will miss.

 

The GMC website says the 2016 has projector headlights with HID bulbs. That sounds nice. Not sure if it would be better or worse than the LEDs in the new 1500s, but if they are true HIDs they will be better than the halogens we have in the 2015s.

 

Remote locking tailgate.

 

Wireless charging and upgraded radio system.

 

Is there anything else major that you lose or gain between the two trucks?

 

The closest dealership is almost 100 miles away so an in-person comparison is not really feasible.

They both have the remote locking tailgate.

 

They both have the K4C wireless charging.

 

If you want any of the driver alert/assist options, availability is different.

 

Airbags are different.

 

Headlights and fogs are different.

 

Rooflamp option on 2500.
If you tow, you can't get tow mirrors on a 1500. (you may be able to mod it yourself or have dealer - but it'll cost a lot more)
Drivetrain as posted above.
Drivetrain, frame and brakes.

 

There's probably more.

 

You can compare here:

 

http://www.gmfleetorderguide.com/NASApp/domestic/proddesc.jsp?year=2016&regionID=1&divisionID=2&type=0&vehicleID=18908&section=oi_def&page=3&butID=3

Posted

I'd wait until next year if you go with a 2500 HD. That's when the HD's get their new powertrains - probably new grill to match the 1500s too.

 

And yes, the 2016 HDs now have HIDs even though they look the same. It's been confirmed by other members in other threads.

Posted

 

 

The closest dealership is almost 100 miles away so an in-person comparison is not really feasible.

So you are saying a 90 minute drive is not worth researching your 65k purchase?

Posted

So you are saying a 90 minute drive is not worth researching your 65k purchase?

 

When I get more serious of course. But that is what a forum is for. I can research here before I make the trek.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
    • Has anyone run these on their 2500?
    • have you stuck with dealer oil changes since then? I made the same switch after getting tired of crawling around under the truck, but I’ve found some dealers are way better than others about getting you in quickly. Curious if yours has been good about scheduling or if you’ve had to look elsewhere for quicker turnaround.
    • Thank you.   I am set on a 3.0 Duramax as my previous truck with a Ford Ecoboost had just as many, if not more, "common" issues.  Cam phasers, timing chain issues, 10-speed valve body and CDF drum, emissions issues, etc.  So I figured, why not get 2x the fuel mileage (these things got 27+mpg on every mixed city/highway test drive I put them through) and better towing capability with resale value to boot?   My minimum, shortest trip will be 50 miles 1-way and I regularly go out of state with a travel trailer.  I'm planning on using this for a marketing/event promotion business also, which would require regular towing of trailers for bands, DJs, sound and lighting gear, along with my personal camera gear for filming events.   Looked at other trucks in the $30k+ price range but the issues seem to be everywhere, plus too many with gaudy mods.  I'm literally sticking with RWD trucks because they tend to be actually used as trucks, vs. the 4x4 models I've seen with unsafe lifts, huge tires, and general mods that would affect reliability (I'm wondering if some of them were tuned, hence the aggressive throttle response and hard shifting).   So my goal is to find a stock, 3.0 with 1 or 2 owners, in good physical condition, and decently well maintained.  Can't seem to find that up here, everything in the $27-30k range has had multiple owners, smoke smell, issues, or body damage.  Or the ridiculously modified trucks with 80k miles for under $27k but lots of problems...
    • That’s pretty tough Grumpy. I reread the previous few posts. They all reference oil changes. Much like your last thread. In my humble opinion it keeps things interesting.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...