Jump to content

Cen/socal area meet Castaic Lake


Chris

Recommended Posts

Posted

I also have a good size canopy so no matter what we have shade this time. It can be adjusted from 12x12 or 12×20. So ill be getting there a bit early and will need help setting that up.

  • Replies 107
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

So 11 o'clock at the castaic lake on May 7? Does anybody have the address?

Posted

So 11 o'clock at the castaic lake on May 7? Does anybody have the address?

32132 Castaic Lake Dr, Castaic, CA 91384

Posted

Jnach, it's an easy 1hr drive out he 126 or 118 for us and then just up the 5. We can meet here in Camarillo and drive out together that morning.

 

Just in case people were unsure, this is an LA county lake. That means no alcohol is allowed anywhere inside and they're pretty strict about giving out fines. I don't think there's any rule against bringing a bbq in the back of a truck though. I can call to find out.

Posted

BBQs are OK.Chris brings his to every meet.

Not anymore. Spurshot is on meat duty now
Posted

Jnach, it's an easy 1hr drive out he 126 or 118 for us and then just up the 5. We can meet here in Camarillo and drive out together that morning.

 

Just in case people were unsure, this is an LA county lake. That means no alcohol is allowed anywhere inside and they're pretty strict about giving out fines. I don't think there's any rule against bringing a bbq in the back of a truck though. I can call to find out.

 

Ya man that would be cool. Just hit me up!

Posted

This week ill build my list and who i need to contact

Posted

The RSVP list is where I am going to pull my PM stuff for pot luck next week

Posted

Chris, when it gets close, I'll need a head count...wives, kids, girlfriends, BFFs, whatever.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This video may not be the exact content for the joke thread but its a lot of laughs so here it is, I've only watched a portion of it so far but if anyone is looking for some light hearted good soap box driving action, its here. As a note in the upper left of the screen it shows the number out of 100 to refer back to any particular vehicle for comment !.    https://www.facebook.com/reel/1351928276956715
    • Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...