Jump to content

What would be considered high mileage for a diesel?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Looking to trade in my 14 Sierra to clear up some debt due to hard times in the Oil and Gas patch. That being said, one of my favorite body styles is the 06 Silverado. Never had a diesel before, but always wanted one. I drive about 30,000 highway miles/year so I could justify a diesel. My budget will be about $20-25k, so I'm testing the waters a bit to see what is out there. I see a good amount of trucks over the 200K mark, but don't know what to think about it. I've always had a gas truck so I'm used to that mileage, but don't really know what is considered "high mileage" for a diesel.

 

Any help is appreciated.

 

Posted

Picking an average for miles per year would be the simplest. 12k, 15k, 20k, per year x years old = miles. This is a tough decision IMO. The big question to me is how well was the maintenance? At 200k miles, trans, wheel bearings, rear axle bearings, u joints, etc.

Posted

Diesels tend to last longer, but then you have to look at the rest of the truck. Diesels from what I've read and seen also tend to cost more to maintain. Personally I would only get a diesel if I needed one for heavy towing, but that's just me. Not trying to talk you out of it, it's your money, just making you aware if you didn't know.

Posted

Picking an average for miles per year would be the simplest. 12k, 15k, 20k, per year x years old = miles. This is a tough decision IMO. The big question to me is how well was the maintenance? At 200k miles, trans, wheel bearings, rear axle bearings, u joints, etc.

 

I agree with you on that. If/when the time comes I will have my mechanic do a good looking into anything before I buy it. Ideally I'd like to get something under 150,000. That year model is a hard truck to come by though.

 

Diesels tend to last longer, but then you have to look at the rest of the truck. Diesels from what I've read and seen also tend to cost more to maintain. Personally I would only get a diesel if I needed one for heavy towing, but that's just me. Not trying to talk you out of it, it's your money, just making you aware if you didn't know.

 

Right, I understand. I do tow frequently. I don't necessarily NEED a diesel to tow the things I do, but I would be doing it with ease. I still haven't completely made up my mind on what route I'm going to go yet. Just trying to get some feedback for now and see where things go.

Posted

Do you really want to step into a vehicle with significantly higher maintenance costs with "Looking to trade in my 14 Sierra to clear up some debt due to hard times in the Oil and Gas patch", particularly if you don't need to?

Posted

Do you really want to step into a vehicle with significantly higher maintenance costs with "Looking to trade in my 14 Sierra to clear up some debt due to hard times in the Oil and Gas patch", particularly if you don't need to?

 

If I were to sell my truck today and pay off my note and potentially pay cash for something else, it would clear up my monthly payment. That being said, I'm not too worried about the maintenance cost as long as I can find something that is in relatively good shape. Currently the only maintenance I'm paying on my truck now is oil changes since it is still "new". I understand the maintenance is more expensive on a diesel, but without a monthly payment I should still be saving money. Sure, it all depends on the truck as well.

 

Like I said, I'm not in a rush to make the switch. I'm in the curiosity stage of the game. Just trying to see what is out there and get all the facts, should I make the switch.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I certainly could be wrong but I hear of pickups far newer than that 2007 cutoff which may not be going to the wrecker but are having engine work done and be that a reman engine or new engine or trying to repair the existing engine. Some of it would be design issues as per the cylinder deactivation system that GM has and one of those lifters wiping out the cam and the question of oil changes moving the needle or not on that whole mess, or in the case of Ford pickup engines that have the long timing chains and wearing them out and the roller followers and phasers and some of that certainly goes back to oil change intervals. But in those various cases the truck has all sorts of life left in it and so the unfortunate owner and may be original owner or used market owner that is pouring money into repairs so the truck is not seeing the salvage yard yet but damage is happening by infrequent oil changes. A friends son had bought a 2018 I think it is half ton GM and it had some sort of extended or used dealer warranty on it and of course the lifter issue bites and its rattling and so the dealer had to swallow the bill and was at least 7000.00 and I think they only replaced what they felt they had to replace so yeah, I can see that being a ticking time bomb in the not too distant future. Would frequent oil changes cure all these engineering "marvels", probably not but some engine designs have shown that they do much better if the oil is changed a lot more often then if the manufacturer service claims are followed. New trucks cost so much that there is an incentive to keep the existing truck on the road by repairing. 
    • get a good code reader, and find out what problems the truck has noticed by reading codes. cheap ones can only get basic engine codes, you may want to get one that can get codes from all the computers in your truck.
    • This is sort of my point, salvage yards aren't overflowing with all these 'poorly' maintained trucks - excellent/good/servicable condition otherwise, salvaged only as a result of a bad engine from poor oil change regiment.    In my area, there are no 2007 to newer gm trucks/suvs in any salvage yards. A few are in the 'recyclers' with very obvious reasons for being there - wrecked.
    • Stabilitrack was a stability control, traction control system, that functioned independently from the transfer case.   Z-71 has nothing to do with the transfer case or differential.   If it does have an AWD system, my memory recalls this being specific to the Denali trim, converting won't be as simple as swapping out mechanical parts like differentials and transfer cases. It will require reprogramming at a minimum. Long story short, not likely worth it.   Pulling a fuse, may disable the AWD system, it might also prevent any other transfer case functions.   However, the AWD case was generally based on the same transfer case you refer to in the 2006 Suburban. If it still has a 4-High and 4-Low where the transfer case locks and splits power 50-50 front to rear, what are you gaining by changing anything? A true-rear wheel drive only, what good will that serve? Not enough to go through the trouble of changing out all the parts.    Generally, all the factory systems will handle a 33" tire and re-gearing. Probably a 35" tire too, if you aren't driving like a caveman. If 35" tires are in the plan...   If you do plan on driving like a caveman or are fully committed to 35" tires, an entire re-think of the build is probably in order. Starting with square one, an IFS front end isn't going to be the best starting point for 35's and caveman driving. 
    • 1/2 qt over full ain`t gonna hurt $h!t. Most times, a whole qt won`t either. Most have windage trays now. As long as the crank isn`t slapping itself in the oil, it`s not the end of the world.   We used to overfill 1 qt at the track, at race time. Better to have it over full than having the pan sucked dry at 6500 rpm`s.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...