Jump to content

Typical Gas Mileage for a 2005 1500 5.3l?


Recommended Posts

Posted

I have an 05 1500 with the 5.3l motor, auto transmission, crew cab, and 4x4. I know the original tag showed highway mileage of 20mpg. The best I've been able to squeeze out of it is 17mpg on 100% highway...but I'm usually at 15-16mpg with some mixed driving. I calculate by hand from tank to tank...not concerned with what the mileage computer shows me. I drive with a soft foot, and very rarely to I hit the gas hard.

 

What does everyone else get? My buddy has an identical truck as mine, just a 2006 instead and regularly gets 18-19mpg on the highway. My truck just passed 140k miles...but has all new fluids (front/rear diff, transfer case, transmission, synthetic oil). Has a new air filter. Everything on the engine, transmission, exhaust is stock. Stock wheel and tire sizes, no lift kits at all. Just had the knock sensors replaced since they were throwing codes. Throttle body and intake was all cleaned out too.

 

What else could I change out to get better mpg? Maybe the spark plugs and wires? What about O2 sensors? What about any sensors? Would high flow catalytic convertors help? I don't have any engine codes, but want to get better mileage if possible. Thanks for any help.

Posted

Did you put a heavier tire on recently? These trucks came with P-rated tires, anything with a LT rating will decrease gas mileage slightly.

Posted

What gears do you have? My truck at the moment is just a weekend vehicle so it is a pretty even mix of highway and town driving. I have 4.10 gears and over the last year I'm at 16.5mpg average.

Posted

The tires are original size, not sure what the load rating is though. I bought the truck last year and haven't changed tires or anything.

 

I don't know what gears it has...how do I check? Can you check with the VIN number or by looking?

Posted

open your glove box and there will be a sticker with a bunch of RPO codes on it. Look for codes that start with G, there should only be 1 or 2. Go to the home page of this site and click on the tools tab, there will be an RPO code look up. You can type the code in there and find out what gears you have.

Posted

It depends of course on what you are trying to tow. But IMO that is a good compromise for both. Decent towing gear and good for mileage.

Posted

Sweet thanks, I have GU6 and G80...looks like a 3.42 rear axle ratio. Is that good or bad for mileage or towing?

 

3.42 in that year of truck was better for mileage, but with the 4 speed transmissions it didn't help that much.

 

Typically 3.73, and 4.10 was for towing back then with the 4 speed transmissions.

 

Also according to this website: https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/bymodel/2005_Chevrolet_Silverado.shtml

 

There aren't any 4x4 trucks from 2005 that were rated at 20 mpg highway. The only one that has a 20mpg highway rating is a 2wd, 4.3L V6

The best rated 5.3L v8 4x4 is the hybrid at 18mpg. So your 5.3L 4x4 is likely rated around 15 city 17 highway.

 

I had a 2002 Silverado 4x4 5.3, 4spd. with 3.73 gears. Before lift and tires, I got about 14 around town and 17 highway. Your 2005 isn't all that different from that 2002. So I would say 17mpg highway is about as best you will get.

Posted

 

3.42 in that year of truck was better for mileage, but with the 4 speed transmissions it didn't help that much.

 

Typically 3.73, and 4.10 was for towing back then with the 4 speed transmissions.

 

Also according to this website: https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/bymodel/2005_Chevrolet_Silverado.shtml

 

There aren't any 4x4 trucks from 2005 that were rated at 20 mpg highway. The only one that has a 20mpg highway rating is a 2wd, 4.3L V6

The best rated 5.3L v8 4x4 is the hybrid at 18mpg. So your 5.3L 4x4 is likely rated around 15 city 17 highway.

 

I had a 2002 Silverado 4x4 5.3, 4spd. with 3.73 gears. Before lift and tires, I got about 14 around town and 17 highway. Your 2005 isn't all that different from that 2002. So I would say 17mpg highway is about as best you will get.

 

Okay, appreciate the help. Not sure where I got the 20 mpg number from. Guess I won't worry too much about mileage then. My buddy must have a unicorn of a truck to get nearly 20mpg that often!

Posted

 

Okay, appreciate the help. Not sure where I got the 20 mpg number from. Guess I won't worry too much about mileage then. My buddy must have a unicorn of a truck to get nearly 20mpg that often!

 

There are things you can do to help get better mileage. You can get a custom tune. I remember after getting a custom tune, I could see 18-19 mpg highway with my 2002. And even after my lift and tires I could still see 17-17.5 on the highway. Pretty good!

 

Also, I think around 05-06 they started using electric fans for the radiator, see if you truck has a regular engine driven fan, or e-fans. There are kits you can buy to convert to e-fans. That will help reduce parasitic drag on your motor to increase all around mileage. I never got around to doing e-fans, but I know it was a popular mod.

 

Also, intake and exhaust would help a little. But I would definitely pair those with a custom tune.

 

I'm sure there are others, but those two I remember were big help for mpg.

Posted

Okay sweet. Both of my fans are already electric, so good to go there. My buddy does have a plug in tuner...no other mods though. So maybe that's giving him a couple mpg boost when cruising on the highway. I'll have to ask him what his tuner is.

Posted

I'd say you're doing pretty good with your current mileage. My '01 Burb with the 5.3 and 4.10 gears got, at best, 15-16 MPG on the highway.

Posted

That seems to be pretty good. I have 3.42's and since I've been making longer trips I'm up to 15 mpg and still climbing. I also have 6 ply LT series tires.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?
    • Rockauto bud. I pass local stores for parts.   Findya something online. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...