Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

2 days in the shop.....might be a good sign that they actually are doing something. But to be fair I have the "loose" steering and the Digital Steering Assist System not working as advertised.

Posted

I have a 2015 2500hd and 2016 3500hd the 15 has 15500 miles no issues ever with anything the 16 has 5500 and at 4500 miles the steering went to 2" to 3" of play this is a big issue for me because I hated the dodge that I had because of replacing steering components every 15000 miles so I bought a 16' silverado for work because my 15' was so great so I'm glad that it isn't just my truck but sad that chevy went to the speed sensing steering I don't like it anyway

  • Like 1
Posted

Bought a new 2016 2500 High Country about 6 weeks ago and has 2500 miles on it now. Steering becomes worse each day. Took it to a dealer here in Atlanta along with the TSB that was posted in this forum and they actually made it worse. Going to dealer #2 next week. I have waited years to buy this truck and I am not very happy at this time.

Posted

It now has more play in the steering. Maybe dealership #2 will get it fixed, fingers crossed. This whole problem makes me sick, the 1500 I traded in drove like a sports car compared to this truck.

Posted

My 2016 2500 HD Denali has had sloppy steering since day one. Was just going to live with it. Then it started leaking and I found this topic and tab. Took a week to get it in, but 2.5 hours later it drives as good as my 2014 1500.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Got it back and within 600 miles it got worse. Had 3-4 inches of play. Took it back and they fixed it. Said they did a long list of items plus recal of sensors. The paperwork states...remove steering box and perform adjustment procedure per bulletin #pit5501c. reset btoe in. relearn steering angle sensor & p/s pressure sensor learn.

Easy steering going slow, much tighter at high speeds plus no slop. We will see......

Posted (edited)

I'm not a big fan of drive by wire for steering. I know a steering shaft can have problems but in my 40 years of driving that has never happened. I want a mechanical solid link, not a wire. I know the 16 still has a shaft but the assist is a wire and is causing problems. Stop the "driver assist" of everything from parking to braking, don't take the experience of driving away, if you don't want to pay attention to your driving then TAKE THE BUS!!

Edited by MotionMan
  • Like 2
Posted

This is not a problem with the digital assist system. The digital assist system on its own cannot cause "play" in the steering. Its a problem with the torque of the pitman arm nut on the steering box itself. Hopefully when they get that sorted you guys wont have any other issues with it.

 

-Eli

If that's the case I wonder if the problem is restricted to trucks built @ 1 of the 2 HD assembly plants (improperly torqued nuts) or both plants (Improper torque spec)?

Posted

I'm not a big fan of drive by wire for steering. I know a steering shaft can have problems but in my 40 years of driving that has never happened. I want a mechanical solid link, not a wire. I know the 16 still has a shaft but the assist is a wire and is causing problems. Stop the "driver assist" of everything from parking to braking, don't take the experience of driving away, if you don't want to pay attention to your driving then TAKE THE BUS!!

Well said! A co-worker & I used to rant all the time about the dumbing down of the driving experience.

 

Do the vehicles posted above all have the Driver Assist option?

Posted

These are not "drive by wire steering". There is a mechanical link from the steering wheel all the way down to the wheels. The Digital Assist power steering only assists with additional "digitally controlled" valves in the steering box through inputs from other computers on board that monitor things like speed, steering wheel positon, force, tow/haul mode, etc. I am not a big fan of it either, but the market dictates what GM does. That means copying other manufacturers and to make the truck drive as easy as a sedan. GM will no doubt eventually catch up to the new Ford adaptive steering too. That's just crazy!

 

At any rate, My 2016 2500HD Duramax has sloppy steering too. So as I sit here and type this, my truck is now in the shop to have this fixed. I drove another 2500HD and the steering on that truck was noticeably much better.

Posted

Got mine back from dealer. TSB procedure was performed. I have to say, the steering feels tighter from center. Only time will tell how well this fix lasts.

Posted

I have a 2016 Duramax 2500hd with 7900 miles and it just went in for this yesterday. I wonder how many people have had this issue, seems like a lot. My dealer said this is the first one for them. He also said that they were going to replace my steering gear not repair/adjust the old one.

 

Please post up if your truck has been in for this!

Posted

Bought my 2016 GMC Sierra 2500 HD diesel crew cab 4x4 in July after retiring the same truck (2007 1/2, new body style) with 267,000 miles and never a problem (still has original brakes). Put 15,000 highway miles on my new truck, various trips, TX to CO twice for scouting/hunting elk, fly fishing here/there with pleasure/ease - this thing is cadillac! On a short trip (180 miles) to do some deer scouting in TX I noticed slack (lash) in my steering. Heading home the next day and the lash had increased to 3-4 inches before the wheels would take up and turn from left to right. WTF? Brand new truck? Contacted the dealer when I got home, service department said don't drive the truck - call roadside assistance and have it towed in. Dealer had if for a day and made the repair. Nut on top of steering box had backed off - they tightened, retorqued (with red permatex) and called it good. Steering back to tite as new, but we'll see. Geez.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,096 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...