Jump to content

Ethanol Free Gas?


GMC2015

Recommended Posts

Posted

Damn. I wish we had E85 for that low a price. But then again I drive a Diesel.. so why? <grin>

Posted

Well curiosity got the better of me, I filled it up today with 90 octane that's ethanol free. So far after a few miles, the truck SEEMS to idle a bit smoother, as in it doesn't dip below 500 rpm as much. I'll run a tank or two to see if it makes any significant improvement in fuel mileage.

 

I'll add that my most recent average was 23.8 mpg on 87 octane (4.3L V6)

Posted

You'll see a slight improvement in acceleration too. It just may get you hooked! These newer vehicles are factory tuned to take advantage of higher octane, vs the older stuff.

Posted

Damn. I wish we had E85 for that low a price. But then again I drive a Diesel.. so why? <grin>

I go thru about 20,000 gallons of diesel a year and still use E85 in vehicles that can use it. I get some decent commercial rates on diesel. Last fill, 92 gallons at $1.76 a gal on diesel. I am always game for a bargain!

Posted

 

Do you mean E10? Normal gas has 10% ethanol.

 

Vast majority of the stations here in Oklahoma offer non-ethanol in 87/89/91 and E10 in 87 only. The older stations that don't have the room for E10 and non-ethanol generally are either pure gas stations or E10 stations. Most stations blend 87 and 91/93 to make 89, so if the 87 is E10 then the 89 will be a slightly less potent E10 blend.

Posted

I run ethanol free 88 octane in all our vehicles. Depending on how many miles they have on them before you switch, it may take a while before you see an increase in gas mileage. Ethanol free does not leave the varnish that ethanol does, and will clean the ethanol varnish over time. Ethanol also begins to turn to a gel over time (takes a long time) which is why companies sell fuel stabilizer for small engines.

 

I have pulled apart TB's that ran ethanol and ones that did not. Ethanol always has varnish, which collects dust that makes it past the filter, which makes a real mess. Ethanol also dries out the fuel, which takes lubricants out that benefit engines. The lack of lubricants is why engines must be made to tolerate levels of ethanol; the special designs do not thing for varnish.

 

If you want more lubrication and less varnish, run ethanol free. If you do not hold on to vehicles long enough for it to matter, then you may be wasting your money. For me, I care as both lubrication and lack of varnish help extend engine life.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Real gas all the way, here in the burbs where you have to buy ethanol, with a lot of stop n go driving fuel mileage sux 11 tp 12 mpg. My wife has a house outside of Bristol , TN where you can buy both type of fuels. I get the real stuff an with a lot of open roads I get 18 to 20 mpg's

Posted

I just never got into the "real" gas mindset. Been using ethanol blends since the late 70's (long before EPA got into the game) with nary a problem. Even on a 1974 Pontiac Catalina with a carbureted 400 in it. Same for a 1979 Bronco with a carbureted 351M. The Catalina went to over 250,000 miles and succumbed to body cancer, but the engine was still good. Since ethanol free is a solid 40-50 cents more per gallon than E10, I have no desire to give it a shot. There is no way it will deliver substantial enough fuel economy increase to offset the higher cost. Heck, I can get 17-18 mpg on E15 (yes E15 which is 5-10 cents a gallon cheaper than E10 in my area and 60 cents cheaper than ethanol free) out of my 2500 6.0L on road trips. 18-20 mpg wouldn't breakeven on a cost per mile basis using ethanol free. For some to be willing to pay more for fuel than necessary when there is no real reasoning to do so out of some fear of ethanol starts to creep into the realm of having an enlarged paranoia gland that needs professional treatment.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

ethanol free 91 is widely available in northern NY, boaters and snowmobilers demand it.

 

I travel back and forth to Fla usually towing and am amazed how hard it is to find e85, if found its only about .10 cheaper than e10 not worth it.

 

my '11 Denali 6.2 was e85 capable but my '17 6.2 is not, ill quit looking.....lol

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I am guessing that engines of that design back then had a better ability to be abused and survive longer than a new design engine with the long timing chain and the overhead cams and phasers etc. But I would never guess that an engine could go that far and not fail spectacularly or at least die a slow death. 
    • In the 80's 90's I'd run Honda's 7,500 miles between changes using Red Line HP 5W20 and do it for hundreds of thousands of miles with issues. Back in the day it was an SAE 20 with the HTHS of a SAE 30 and SN add load. It was also very polar. Oxidation VOA was over 120. Besides those motors were SPFI and lean burn tech. I could have likely run it longer but never did.    We had a Toyota bought new I ran on Pennzoil's latest and greatest synthetic of the day with "Penthane". A made up word for a very low dose of PAO. Tried 7,500 mile OCI's in that Group III/VI chemistry and the rings tapped out at 90K. Rocker box wasn't as bad as the one Punch put up but it wasn't good either. Also a SPFI motor.    I'm around 3,750 across the board on these GDI monsters and the oil it tapped out by then usually on TBN/TAN crossover and color. Red Line HP Euro.    The AMSOIL SS brochures tell you to follow the OEM values for the service class but that it can be run up to 25K if monitored. I can't imagine what motor could go that distance and not tap out. I've never owned one.    Yes, I know. Lot's of people do. I'm just not going to be one of them. 
    • I knew a guy in the early 80's that bought a new Monte Carlo and ran it a 100,000 miles without ever changing the filter or the oil. Just kept adding. It looked like that inside.     
    • Good evening. I was lucky enough to get passed down to me a 2007 GMC LBZ that was my great uncle's. While the underside and rockers are more or less gone I feel like with time I can restore it to working order since it only has 110,000 miles and he put nearly every option he could get without getting the new body style since he did not trust DEF. So far I have done everything I can think of but when I put the key into the ignition nothing happens. I put 2 brand new batteries in it. Cleaned the terminals. Check all the fuses and relays and they all pass with my multimeter. I know I'm missing something that I just cant think of. The only odd thing is the OBD2 port works which makes me think its not the mega fuse. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. 
    • Looks nice. I still have my 2000, 1500. Bought a 2025, 1500 for retirement. Feels solid. These trucks have a bad rap on the internet. My brother has a `24 1500, 5.3 with 52,000 miles. No problems at all. Mine hasn`t either but mine`s only at 12,700 miles. Have seen some of these things with 100,000 miles with no problems.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...