Jump to content

Time for new tires

Rme2513

By Rme2513
in Modifications & Accessories

Recommended Posts

Rme2513 Enthusiast

Rme2513

Posted
Posted

I have almost worn out the stock tires on my truck and want a good AT tire either in a 265 70 18 ( 32.5 x 10.5 ) or a 275 70 18 ( 33 x 10.8 ) any One have any suggestions on what is the best without going over board

Darren14 Enthusiast

Darren14

Posted
Posted

I recently put on 275/70/18 hankook dynapro at-m. They have been great so far. I've taken them through mud, gravel, rocks, dirt, hills and lots of backroad country hunting trails. They have worked flawlessly. I wish they were more aggressive looking, but that is simply for aesthetic purposes. Overall they are a fantastic tire and priced very well.

rawalters117 Enthusiast

rawalters117

Posted
Posted

I have almost worn out the stock tires on my truck and want a good AT tire either in a 265 70 18 ( 32.5 x 10.5 ) or a 275 70 18 ( 33 x 10.8 ) any One have any suggestions on what is the best without going over board

 

I have heard great things about the new Falken Wildpeak At3w's. They look pretty good, and in a 275/70/18 they are a steal from discount tire direct. If you want a more proven tire that has been out for a while, I would recommend the Toyo At2's, but they are much more expensive than the Falkens.

Rme2513 Enthusiast

Rme2513

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thanks I have also been looking at the general grabber at2 in the 265 70 they have pretty deep tread just have not heard any thing about them

ChevyRoofer Senior Enthusiast

ChevyRoofer

Posted
Posted

I have almost worn out the stock tires on my truck and want a good AT tire either in a 265 70 18 ( 32.5 x 10.5 ) or a 275 70 18 ( 33 x 10.8 ) any One have any suggestions on what is the best without going over board

 

I'll be upgrading to the BFG KO2 in the 275/70/18 size @ 40k miles. It's a 10-ply E-rated tire, tad bit heavier. But is a true 33"

amxguy1970 Senior Enthusiast

amxguy1970

Posted
Posted

What's the best? The hardest question to answer in any of the other dozens of threads asking the same question. So much personal opinion and many variables. What's most important? Longevity? Looks? Off road traction? Street driving manners? Quietness? Ect...

 

The grabbers are a great tire (16/32 tread depth in P rated too), many good reviews on them for a much cheaper price then a BFG and they are studdable and snow rated in many sizes. Cooper AT3 is a great tire too and has one some comparison tests for all around ability on and off road. The ATM's I have heard good things about too as well as the Toyo's (though as noted are expensive almost like the BFG's). Falkens are a new tire I am hearing some good things about but they are more aggressive and a hybrid (think duratracs or cooper pros) not an all terrain.

 

All depends on what you are looking for, search, there is tons of good info and opinions out there. Also check out other forums when you good search, they help give good ideas too...

 

An E-rated tire isn't a tad bit heavier than stock it is quite a bit and will have a hit on mpg and performance. Stick with LT C rated or P rated if you aren't towing often near your max or off roading a ton in rough areas prone to flats regularly, your daily drive routes and passengers will thank you.

 

Tyler

bc-chris Enthusiast

bc-chris

Posted
Posted

What's the best? The hardest question to answer in any of the other dozens of threads asking the same question. So much personal opinion and many variables. What's most important? Longevity? Looks? Off road traction? Street driving manners? Quietness? Ect...

 

The grabbers are a great tire (16/32 tread depth in P rated too), many good reviews on them for a much cheaper price then a BFG and they are studdable and snow rated in many sizes.

 

....

 

Tyler

 

i just got studded general grabber at2's for my winters - so far i'm really happy with them - all i've ever had on my '14 (and before that my '89) were bfg muds

 

 

IMG_3144_zpsgdfyqrwg.jpg

Rme2513 Enthusiast

Rme2513

Posted
  • Author
Posted

As of right now I think I will go with the 265 70 grabber at2 but feel free to keep giving good ideas

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined

  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 688 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • nfisherman
      Software Update

      By nfisherman · Posted

      Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...