Jump to content

Rear Tailgate Assist

MotionMan

Recommended Posts

MotionMan Enthusiast

MotionMan

Posted
Posted

You mean to tell me this thing is a piece of plastic? Mine just broke with 10,000 miles. I use it every day and tonight I heard a crack and noticed it was toast, popped the gate and pulled the pieces out. Now it slams open like a 1971 C10. I guess I will demand 30 of them.

MotionMan Enthusiast

MotionMan

Posted
  • Author
Posted

There is a torsion bar the plastic bushing attaches to on the side you lift it off, the other side has a rubber bushing that slows the fall. The plastic bushing split and crumbled There has to be a better way, plastic will never last long.

Cowpie Senior Enthusiast

Cowpie

Posted
Posted

I never cared for the assist thing. I would prefer the old hook and chain style of my 1966 Chevy C10 than the latch thing that pickups have. Could use the hook and chain style to set the tailgate at differing angles, not just up or down. At least a tailgate that was easily removed when I need to do so like all my others up thru my '98 2500. The assist thing is alright for some. Mine goes on my 2500 and I will not be replacing it.

LakeSpeed Enthusiast

LakeSpeed

Posted
Posted

I agree, I cannot imagine how the engineers who designed this expected it to hold up. Got to be a better way.

revrnd Senior Enthusiast

revrnd

Posted
Posted

I agree, I cannot imagine how the engineers who designed this expected it to hold up. Got to be a better way.

Same ones that were behind the tailgate cable fiasco a few years ago?

 

When 1 of them broke on my 2000, I fabbed a pair of hinges using the C/K hinge as a suggestion.

MotionMan Enthusiast

MotionMan

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The problem is I just started to trust it and not hold it all the way down. Tonight I just let it drop and it was not a good sound. I'm thinking the same, I'll get this one and if it happens again it's back to the old way. If my hands were full it is nice. Oh and the plastic piece is $40 but it's a warranty item.

revrnd Senior Enthusiast

revrnd

Posted
Posted

I'm surprised it works as well as it does. I think it was offered on the GMT900s & I don't think it made much difference.

newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted

I'm surprised it works as well as it does. I think it was offered on the GMT900s & I don't think it made much difference.

 

 

900's had the easy up assist which is the torsion bar in the tailgate that is keyed to the left (driver's side) hinge. The easy down gate feature started on K2 trucks. They use the dumb plastic bushing in the passenger hinge, and then there is an dampener behind the passenger tail light.

20L8TSierra24 Senior Enthusiast

20L8TSierra24

Posted
Posted

Mine broke @ 8k. I'm not even going to worry about it at this point. I don't want to waste my time for another one to break and repeated trips to the dealer... If there is a design change with an updated piece, maybe.

MotionMan Enthusiast

MotionMan

Posted
  • Author
Posted

If I were a Tool & Die maker I would make one out of Bilett Aluminium and never look back I did get a new one and I was wrong on how it works, it's a spring cam on the bushing side that slows it, without the bushing it is pretty sloppy. So I will give it one more try but I think the engineer who designed this has no clue to the fact that plastic on metal moving back and forth will eat that plastic.

newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted

Mine broke @ 8k. I'm not even going to worry about it at this point. I don't want to waste my time for another one to break and repeated trips to the dealer... If there is a design change with an updated piece, maybe.

 

They sure charge a pretty penny for it...retail is $41.05!

 

If I were a Tool & Die maker I would make one out of Bilett Aluminium and never look back I did get a new one and I was wrong on how it works, it's a spring cam on the bushing side that slows it, without the bushing it is pretty sloppy. So I will give it one more try but I think the engineer who designed this has no clue to the fact that plastic on metal moving back and forth will eat that plastic.

 

You'd be rich making replacements with all the trucks out there... :smoker:

revrnd Senior Enthusiast

revrnd

Posted
Posted

If I were a Tool & Die maker I would make one out of Bilett Aluminium and never look back I did get a new one and I was wrong on how it works, it's a spring cam on the bushing side that slows it, without the bushing it is pretty sloppy. So I will give it one more try but I think the engineer who designed this has no clue to the fact that plastic on metal moving back and forth will eat that plastic.

LOL

 

Does anyone have any pics?

 

Was the Vehicle Line Executive for the K2XX program a woman? I seem to recal the "big cheese" @ the head of the GMT900 was a woman. I wonder how much real world exeperience she had w/ trucks?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • PunchT37
      OCI, not when but why?

      By PunchT37 · Posted

      My brother has a 2007 Avalanche with afm 5.3. It`s got 176,000 miles. Runs like a clock. Never been apart. Co worker has a 2010 Tahoe with afm 5.3. 230,000 miles. Never been apart. Runs like a clock. So, even though cyl deac is a weak spot, they can go the distance.   BUT, these engines had the oil changed regularly, AND had 5w30 as spec. I wonder if they would have lasted this far on 0w20? I`ll bet not.
    • Chuck FB
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I certainly could be wrong but I hear of pickups far newer than that 2007 cutoff which may not be going to the wrecker but are having engine work done and be that a reman engine or new engine or trying to repair the existing engine. Some of it would be design issues as per the cylinder deactivation system that GM has and one of those lifters wiping out the cam and the question of oil changes moving the needle or not on that whole mess, or in the case of Ford pickup engines that have the long timing chains and wearing them out and the roller followers and phasers and some of that certainly goes back to oil change intervals. But in those various cases the truck has all sorts of life left in it and so the unfortunate owner and may be original owner or used market owner that is pouring money into repairs so the truck is not seeing the salvage yard yet but damage is happening by infrequent oil changes. A friends son had bought a 2018 I think it is half ton GM and it had some sort of extended or used dealer warranty on it and of course the lifter issue bites and its rattling and so the dealer had to swallow the bill and was at least 7000.00 and I think they only replaced what they felt they had to replace so yeah, I can see that being a ticking time bomb in the not too distant future. Would frequent oil changes cure all these engineering "marvels", probably not but some engine designs have shown that they do much better if the oil is changed a lot more often then if the manufacturer service claims are followed. New trucks cost so much that there is an incentive to keep the existing truck on the road by repairing. 
    • davester
      Tranmission stays in Low

      By davester · Posted

      get a good code reader, and find out what problems the truck has noticed by reading codes. cheap ones can only get basic engine codes, you may want to get one that can get codes from all the computers in your truck.
    • asilverblazer
      OCI, not when but why?

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      This is sort of my point, salvage yards aren't overflowing with all these 'poorly' maintained trucks - excellent/good/servicable condition otherwise, salvaged only as a result of a bad engine from poor oil change regiment.    In my area, there are no 2007 to newer gm trucks/suvs in any salvage yards. A few are in the 'recyclers' with very obvious reasons for being there - wrecked.
    • asilverblazer
      Stabilitrak conversion to Z71

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      Stabilitrack was a stability control, traction control system, that functioned independently from the transfer case.   Z-71 has nothing to do with the transfer case or differential.   If it does have an AWD system, my memory recalls this being specific to the Denali trim, converting won't be as simple as swapping out mechanical parts like differentials and transfer cases. It will require reprogramming at a minimum. Long story short, not likely worth it.   Pulling a fuse, may disable the AWD system, it might also prevent any other transfer case functions.   However, the AWD case was generally based on the same transfer case you refer to in the 2006 Suburban. If it still has a 4-High and 4-Low where the transfer case locks and splits power 50-50 front to rear, what are you gaining by changing anything? A true-rear wheel drive only, what good will that serve? Not enough to go through the trouble of changing out all the parts.    Generally, all the factory systems will handle a 33" tire and re-gearing. Probably a 35" tire too, if you aren't driving like a caveman. If 35" tires are in the plan...   If you do plan on driving like a caveman or are fully committed to 35" tires, an entire re-think of the build is probably in order. Starting with square one, an IFS front end isn't going to be the best starting point for 35's and caveman driving. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...