Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Maybe you could put some expandable polyurethane tape around the inside of the gas cap door.

Posted (edited)

 

One week of ownership and filled it today when the low fuel warning popped up. The cap-less fill worked fine - it's like not knowing you are pumping gas. I do have it covered with this dust cap to keep things clean and dry:

 

http://www.ebay.com/itm/WATER-DUST-GAS-CAP-COVER-2017-CHEVROLET-SILVERADO-GMC-SIERRA-CAPLESS-FUEL-FILL-/382009468868?hash=item58f189e7c4:g:Ag0AAOSwXYtYzzeq&vxp=mtr

 

:driving:

 

 

Does that slip on and off easily? One can't help but wonder how functional it is a -20F in a snow storm for ease of removal, or if it will crack. Nothing seems easy at temps like that.

Edited by Cowpie
Posted

 

 

Does that slip on and off easily? One can't help but wonder how functional it is a -20F in a snow storm for ease of removal, or if it will crack. Nothing seems easy at temps like that.

 

 

Yes and seals tightly - -20F - All bets are off...........

 

:noway:

Posted

Unless they made some change I can't see can't you just buy a 2016 filler pipe and change out that section and put a cap on it.

 

It only looks like $60 to $70 in parts.

 

It's a two part filler pipe connected with hose clamps.

Posted

While this capless thing might be fine for the average user, it seems to be a real PITA for those that fit outside the average user. There are many reasons that it would not be ideal. Those of us that live rural, there are times when getting gas from the tank for some use is necessary. Also, the amount of crud that can build up under the fill door when living and driving several miles daily on gravel roads. Some of us fill from gas barrels that we have on our property and those nozzles do not always conform exactly to nozzle sizes that are typically at gas stations.

 

It is ideas like this that get thrust upon vehicle owners, irregardless of OEM brand, that makes owning a newer vehicle seem less and less of a proposition to look forward to. Was recently looking over vehicle offerings from several OEM's, including GM, as a possible replacement for the wife's 2006 Cadillac CTS. All I got was depressed. All vehicles I looked at had some features that were nice, but more that turned me off. I finally gave up. The Caddy is still in pretty good shape, body wise, so I am considering just dropping in a reman engine when this one goes south and keeping the car. I am glad I got my 2015 2500 when I did. Not quite what I would have liked in a pickup (none of the pickup brands are what I consider totally ideal), but it is strong and reliable. At least it had more positive features than negative ones.

  • 3 years later...
Posted

2017 Silverado 1500 50K miles showing code P0442.  “Small evap leak detected”. Filled up. Saran wrapped filler neck and cleared code.  Code was coming in every evap test cycle.  Stayed clear until I removed Saran Wrap for next fueling.  Obviously a bad capless filler neck.  Is there a recall or warranty to cover this?   If not does the aftermarket vinyl/rubber dust cap seal enough to pass emissions test?  Dealership wanted $130 dollars to “ smoke test” evap system.  $1 worth of Saran Wrap was all troubleshooting required. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • https://precisionlubrication.com/articles/oil-filter-efficiency/     For them it is a problem of $$$$ and compliance. To cover both they have to lie from the heart.    Government wants low waste oil numbers so the bar needs to be very low on contamination to met that requirement.  Consumer wants cheap maintenance (perceived cost). Again requiring a low bar.  OEM wants high margins at a cost effective warranty rate and lots of repeat customers. More low bar.  Filter manufacture wants the same thing the OEM wants. See the pattern?   Consumers are fickle and also want perfection requiring a HIGH bar. Inconsistent with all of the above. Consumers can be, when the put their minds to it, inquisitive, love winning arguments which requires some useful information to be available to support them. And this is where it gets sticky and the lies begin.    Information needs a solid well grounded point of reference if we are to compare in a useful way. There is a standard for this.  ISO 4548-12. This standard sets the particle size at a specific Beta ratio and darn few are faithful to its intent.    If they don't state the test method they change the particle size or the Beta ratio to hit a perceived favorable standard. They obscure the information in a way as to prevent direct comparisons leaving the consumer with one method. UOA's with an ISO 4406 test result. Pricey and not allot of labs willing to do the work. Lobby work happens everywhere, not just at the seat of government.       
    • IF,IF,IF. If they cared about quality instead of profit and this applies to any company, what a concept. 
    • Good Morning Gents..hope everyone is enjoying a beautiful saturday morning. I have a 2001 GMC Sierra that I bought used in 2018. I am the 2nd owner and its a beautiful truck. Ive put about 60,000 miles on it and recently the front end has felt funny. Kind of loose when hitting bumps adn sometimes I actually feel a "bang" in the steering wheel. I took it to a local guy who said that everything was tight and he tightened the steering box. It didnt feel much better, so I had him replace the front shocks, which had noto been done since I bought it. It had the check enging light on so I took it into a local garage to fix that and check out the suspension. Everything is original and the rubber bushings that I can see look bad. They said everything was tight and there wasnt any play in the front end. Im concerned about the banging feeling in the wheel. Ive been driving this truck for 8 years, so I know how it usually feels and this is something new. Its a second vehicle, so I dont drive it all the time, but Im trying to use it more often. I live out in the country and some of the  roads are kind of rough and I alive on gravel roads. Anyone deal with anything like this before? 
    • Yes of course. There’s no experience in the Trump organization in hiring contractors. it’s not like they’re experienced in that field.😆
    • Well, 2 no-bid contracts to donors didn't seem to result in a good job...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...