Jump to content

Catch Can


Recommended Posts

Posted

Is the jury in yet on the subject of catch cans? Valid piece of equipment or snake oil? At any rate, it seems the sort of thing the dealers might be embracing, just like VIN etching or fabric protection. I can just hear the pitch: "Keep your engine running cleaner, smoother, longer! Ask about our Catch Can service - available for only $895". Are they missing the boat or do they already have enough ways to remove what's in your pocket?

Posted

There's 59 million threads on this. Some say yes. Some say meh. I bought one. I'm installing it later today. I'm sure it's not needed but it's good to have.

Posted

Devil's advocate would say maybe the mist in the engine is by design - maybe a catch can removing it is not only unnecessary but detrimental........... GM did do a little testing on GDI engines U know..........

Posted

Hard to figure blow-by being a design feature. But, I'm far from being an automotive engineer. I tend to think that, if it's such a wonderful thing, the manufacturer and/or dealer would be on it. As always, putting too much creedence in what a vendor has to say might not be in your best interest.

Posted

I bought one. They aren't expensive I'm sure it'll help some

Posted

I bought one. They aren't expensive I'm sure it'll help some

 

As far as deductive reasoning goes, the "It doesn't hurt anything (except your bank account)" argument would seem the most efficacious. The same reasoning might be applied to support painting pink polka dots all over your truck (also not expensive). Impeccable logic. But, common sense good idea?

Posted

To many big words for me to comprehend.

 

To make this easier. There is no yes or no. You either want it or you don't.

 

Will it hurt? No.

Posted

To many big words for me to comprehend.

 

To make this easier. There is no yes or no. You either want it or you don't.

 

Will it hurt? No.

 

Just out of curiosity, which words are giving you the most trouble?

 

The issue is whether you want it because it's a good idea or because you've been led to believe so by the marketing.

 

Saying it won't hurt validates my argument.

Posted

I think it's a good idea. But that's my opinion. All of my buddies with 99-up motors have them and wear by them. The shit that comes out of them is a trip. So for me after seeing them needing them. I'm sold

Posted

if you look at the Camaro forums, theres a lot of info there...I like the ones that the bottom of the can screws off, for easier cleaning, compared to the petcock/hose on the bottom of the can...

I the the Apex Speed and the Elite are 2 good ones...

Posted

OP, its a catch can, basic fuction is to catch/trap PCV vapors, oil mist, water vapor, I can say yes! it works. I have ran my can since I have owned the truck for 11months & 11days and 19xx miles so far, 1 oil change due b/c of time, I caught both oil & water vapor. I chose a larger can for improved surface area. Elite Ultra 2x something...

 

However IMO, I might move my location to front grille area, the catch can gets very warm under the hood over aux battery location, if the idea is to turn liquid vapor/mist back to a liquid its best to keep the can cooler even with the interior mesh and tubes.

Posted

if you look at the Camaro forums, theres a lot of info there...I like the ones that the bottom of the can screws off, for easier cleaning, compared to the petcock/hose on the bottom of the can...

I the the Apex Speed and the Elite are 2 good ones...

This

Posted

I bought the Moroso catch can, it's amazing what nasty stuff comes out of it. My plan is a remote resiviour below and leave the drain open. All air tight of course.

Posted

There is the issue of warranty being voided due to installation of mod. Has anyone looked into that?

Posted

Before you take it in to the dealer just pull if off. Takes 5 minutes

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,938
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    C. Hart
    Newest Member
    C. Hart
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 592 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks everyone for the help!   I'm going to stop into the scales one of these days and weigh my axels, for the time being, I am going to run Toyo's recommendations and also do a chalk test. I have a tire shop that's going to try their scanner to reprogram and set the the factory psi values lower, and if they can't I'm going to order a scanner and do it myself!
    • You won’t do better than stock exhaust without headers. Just put your favorite muffler on it and it will do the job. 
    • I have seen different people in different places post different sizes of exhaust as stock for my 2014 Sierra L83. Some say 2.5 some say 2.75. I am considering replacing the muffler with a Dynomax Super Turbo, perhaps 17739.  I had the factory L83 5.3 replaced with another L83 5.3 from Jasper Engines. I also put new Walker Cat / Y pipe on. I would appreciate opinions suggestions about what would be a good muffler setup. My main interest is a low rumble and the best flow / fuel mileage I can get. Not interested in straight through glass packs or loud exhaust. Those days are way behind me now.  Thanks Guys.  
    • Its coolant disguised as oil.   TSB 20-NA-166 -  20-NA-166 1..3   "To inspect for this concern, add coolant dye to the system, run the engine through warm up, pressurize the cooling system after warming the engine to operating temperature (let the engine cool overnight) and inspect the suspect cylinder with a borescope for coolant dye evidence. At times it may be necessary to remove the head for inspection. If the head casting line is the concern, the intake port will be wet with a coolant oil mix"     I'd say its the head, and its either leaking at the casting line and dripping down the intake into the cylinder, or its another spot on the casting itself at the cylinder that is getting wet.  
    • Can you sample the pooled liquid, enough to confirm it is oil?   ...That its not fuel or coolant.   Also, make sure combustion gases aren't entering the cooling system.   Simply put, either oil being pushed up past the rings (this really isn't possible), oil leaking past the head gasket, oil leaking past the valve, oil entering through the intake air path. If none of this is likely - it may not be oil.   What could be likely is the fuel injector leaking down. A puddle of gas would still smoke and rough idle. (Same cylinder has the same problem after injector replacement?)   What is the crank time first thing in the morning, when the puddle would be present? Does it seem like the high pressure fuel pump needs an extra second or two to rebuild the pressure that injector 8 may have let bleed off? Check the fuel pressure via a scanner prior to starting the engine.    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...