Jump to content

Touch screen not sensing touch

rtownsend

By rtownsend
in Troubleshooting & Recalls

 Share

Recommended Posts

rtownsend Enthusiast

rtownsend

Posted
Posted

My 2015 LTZ is not sensing touch on the bottom half of the screen most of the time. The top usually works along with the very bottom row. Anyone know what the fix will probably be? I'm out of warranty.

 

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

x219c Enthusiast

x219c

Posted
Posted

There is likely a problem with the digitizer, cables, or the touch controller. Usually the screen and digitizer are in one unit, but can sometimes be ordered separately if they're not fused together. They may even have the controller in the same unit. Not sure if they are here or not. Getting a new "screen" (with digitizer) may fix the issue if the screen has all of the items integrated. Otherwise you may replace one thing and find out it's actually something else. I'm not sure if the controller is housed with the screen or is on the HMI. Hopefully in the screen assembly.

 

Looks like you may be able to get a screen assembly for around $350 on eBay if you're out of warranty.

 

You may want to check with the MVI guys, they may know the specifics as to how this system is laid out, and may even have some extras laying around they could sell.

 

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

rtownsend Enthusiast

rtownsend

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thanks for the post, I didn't think of MVI. I'll message them to see what they recommend. I may pull it out and at least reseat any connectors that I can find.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

redwngr Senior Enthusiast

redwngr

Posted
Posted

Before you spend money, check with your dealer. The may be policy/goodwill warranty available.

  • 2 weeks later...
rtownsend Enthusiast

rtownsend

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Does anyone know if a new screen will requires any programming to work with my HMI?

 

I can't find a breakdown of the difference between different screens. I'm going to look to be sure this weekend but I think my part number is 23383728.

x219c Enthusiast

x219c

Posted
Posted

I would guess there's no programming required. That's just a guess though. I'd just make sure to get the right part number.

 

That said, as someone just above mentioned, I would check and see what the dealer says before throwing parts at it. Although, if they charge a hefty "diagnostic" fee, this would probably be the first thing I replaced.

 

Good luck!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • 2 weeks later...
rtownsend Enthusiast

rtownsend

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Does it work better first thing in morning, when its cold? Does it work better after it has been on for an hour?

It used to work randomly. Now, it is consistent and only works on the top half and along the very bottom.

  • 2 years later...
Joe silverado owner New Member

Joe silverado owner

Posted
Posted

My touch screen went crazy at about 60K miles, the dealer replaced the touch screen and the HMI and it worked perfectly until recently, now I have the same problem again! The dealer stated that the new screen had a 12 month or 12K mile warranty, of course I'm out of warranty again. The last repair was over $1,000.00.

Thinking about a Ford

  • Like 1
  • 11 months later...
  • 2 years later...
TexasEarl New Member

TexasEarl

Posted
Posted

I have a 2015 silverado LT and my screen does not respond to touch at all. I bought another one off of ebay and still have the same issue. I saw HMI mentioned on here. What is that and does it affect the screen? And who are the MIV guys?

  • 1 year later...
Jhester42 New Member

Jhester42

Posted
Posted
On 5/2/2023 at 3:07 PM, TexasEarl said:

I have the same exact problem in my truck and mine is the same model, year. Have no clue how to fix it 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Zane
      2027 Chevrolet Silverado: Official Discussion

      By Zane · Posted

      It's official. Chevy pulled the covers off the next-gen 2027 Silverado 1500, and we got the first official look.   Full breakdown here: https://www.gm-trucks.com/2027-chevrolet-silverado-official-first-look-specs/   The quick hits: LT is dead. The new core trim is just called "Silverado." Two new V8s, a 5.7L and a 6.6L. No horsepower or torque numbers yet. The 2.7 TurboMax finally gets the 10-speed. ZR2 moves to standard 35s with front and rear lockers. Over 60 inches of dash display on ZR2 and High Country, passenger screen included. Seven trims, three lifted from the factory: ZR2, Trail Boss, and a new Custom Trail Boss.   So let's get into it: 5.7 and 6.6 instead of holding out for a 6.7. Right call? Killing the LT name after all these years: bold, or a mistake? Does the new look land for you, or is it too safe? No power numbers at reveal. Smart tease, or frustrating? What are you ordering on day one?   Drop your first impressions below. 
    • RyanbabZ71
      Gas Prices

      By RyanbabZ71 · Posted

      LOL west coast they need to see what the midwest actually has.  We have been holding at 2.99 for a few weeks now.  Even by work they have come down to 3.02 for the past week.
    • No F-bdy Bs
      Brand new to this forum. Questions about re-gearing my 26’ HD

      By No F-bdy Bs · Posted

      Diesel or gas?  The 37s will obviously, drastically reduce mpg, but the gasser will take a bigger hit to mpg, and power.  Rough guess, but I'd estimate at least a  2mpg hit on the diesel, and up to 4on the gasser. Maybe more.    I wouldn't sweat a gear change on a duramax at all, and unlikely on the gasser either. You're obviously not concerned with acceleration or towing, and the 10spd will find itself in the right gear without much hunting, if any.    If towing, mpg and acceleration are a concern, you're doing the wrong mods.  Either leave it alone, or do the lift/tires and let the chips fall where they may. 
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      I understand. It is disturbing to think a manufacture asks so much and gives so little in engineering support. This is not a GM issues, this is a greed issue and one the ALL practice.    My intent was not to remove the wind from anyone's sail but rather to point out the areas deficient so that they can be discussed with improvements the goal. But to do that you have to know the truth and what that truth is.    The commercial interest are honed in on a few select issues in which they control all the variables and are not forthcoming in the least with their customers about the details. Failure is the only thing that drives these people to improvement. One way not to fail it to manage public "expectations". The set a bar they can clear and put their thumbs under the suspenders with chest puffed.... Only the internal data tells the story fully. As we don't have access to that for decades then we have to generate it ourselves. UOA's with data that matters.  
    • Chuck FB
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...