Jump to content

Cadillac escalade engine cover on a chevy Silverado

Johnny01
 Share

Recommended Posts

Johnny01 Enthusiast

Johnny01

Posted
Posted

Could someone please tell me what kind of engine cover studs they used on the 5.3l V8? And where I can purchase them or the part number?

 

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

2017SierraSLT
2017SierraSLT

I was able to complete the installation of the Cadillac Escalade engine cover back in October. I refinished it in black metallic. The GMC emblem is for a Terrain 12620296. My '17 did not have the moun

Johnny01
Johnny01

This is the one.Johnny01: Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

Johnny01
Johnny01

Does the cover studs screw into the cover or the intake? Or do need brackets to screw into? Johnny01. Please respond. Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

Posted Images

2017SierraSLT Senior Enthusiast

2017SierraSLT

Posted
Posted

I was able to complete the installation of the Cadillac Escalade engine cover back in October. I refinished it in black metallic. The GMC emblem is for a Terrain 12620296. My '17 did not have the mounting studs. They were 11611691. The Escalade engine cover is GM 12643295. The Chevrolet emblem is 92068693.

. studs.jpg

 

cover.jpgcover3.jpg95f818f5752d85e4ed8da75804fd18c7.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Ozer Enthusiast

Ozer

Posted
Posted (edited)

This is pretty cool, i wasnt aware of this mod. You can always hydrodip that cover for some added cool factor :) 

 

I just bought a used one off ebay for $41 shipped. There are few more at that price. 

Edited by Ozer
Mike GMC Enthusiast

Mike GMC

Posted
Posted

Is this purely cosmetic, or does this cover serve a function?  The one on my 08 Caddy had a bunch of sound deadening material under it.  

Jaychevy81 Enthusiast

Jaychevy81

Posted
Posted
This is pretty cool, i wasnt aware of this mod. You can always hydrodip that cover for some added cool factor [emoji4] 
 
I just bought a used one off ebay for $41 shipped. There are few more at that price. 

I tried looking on eBay didn’t find any like that do you have any part number or anything to search thanks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Johnny01 Enthusiast

Johnny01

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I tried looking on eBay didn’t find any like that do you have any part number or anything to search thanks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's a Cadillac escalade engine cover off a 2014 thru 2016. You should be able to Google it or find it on ebay. Part number is 12643295. You can purchase it new from Auto Parts AAA

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

Johnny01 Enthusiast

Johnny01

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Did to have to take the oem intake cover off to install this Cadillac escalade cover or does it install over the oem intake cover that came from factory. Thanks.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

Johnny01 Enthusiast

Johnny01

Posted
  • Author
Posted
The existing cover stays. The Escalade cover fits right on.
Thanks so much, I received mine today and wanted to get my ducks in a row before I start.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

Johnny01 Enthusiast

Johnny01

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Thanks so much, I received mine today and wanted to get my ducks in a row before I start.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

Does the cover studs screw into the cover bolts holes or intake bolts holes? And do you know the torque for the cover studs? THANKS, JOHNNY01.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

Johnny01 Enthusiast

Johnny01

Posted
  • Author
Posted
The existing cover stays. The Escalade cover fits right on.
Does the cover studs screw into the cover or the intake? Or do need brackets to screw into? Johnny01. Please respond.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

  • Confused 1
2017SierraSLT Senior Enthusiast

2017SierraSLT

Posted
Posted

Please re-read my first post in this topic. The first pic clearly shows the studs circled in red. They are screwed into the intake...

WesternMike Enthusiast

WesternMike

Posted
Posted
Please re-read my first post in this topic. The first pic clearly shows the studs circled in red. They are screwed into the intake...



The studs highlighted in red in your photo, are they the ones required for the overlay? Or are they the ones that were on your truck prior?

I currently have these studs already on my engine. Just looking to figure out if I’ll need to order the studs are or not.

Thanks buddy. Cleans the engine bay up!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Johnny01 Enthusiast

Johnny01

Posted
  • Author
Posted



The studs highlighted in red in your photo, are they the ones required for the overlay? Or are they the ones that were on your truck prior?

I currently have these studs already on my engine. Just looking to figure out if I’ll need to order the studs are or not.

Thanks buddy. Cleans the engine bay up!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Johnny01: my truck doesn't have the studs.I ordered a set of two and received them today. Thanks!!!

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Chuck FB
      Joke Thread

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      This video may not be the exact content for the joke thread but its a lot of laughs so here it is, I've only watched a portion of it so far but if anyone is looking for some light hearted good soap box driving action, its here. As a note in the upper left of the screen it shows the number out of 100 to refer back to any particular vehicle for comment !.    https://www.facebook.com/reel/1351928276956715
    • SFC Retired
      2023 DRW Wheel Liners

      By SFC Retired · Posted

      Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • SFC Retired
      2023 DRW Wheel Liners

      By SFC Retired · Posted

      Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • KARNUT
      OCI, not when but why?

      By KARNUT · Posted

      As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...