Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
These trucks have the capacity to adjust to the fuel being used. I used E-85 locally and mid grade on trips.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


I called a Valero in Conroe, asked what the octane was on the E85, lady said 85. Is that true?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted


I called a Valero in Conroe, asked what the octane was on the E85, lady said 85. Is that true?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

105, it can very a bit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, TXGREEK said:

 


I called a Valero in Conroe, asked what the octane was on the E85, lady said 85. Is that true?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

lol pretty sure that is false, E85 is over 100 octane I believe.

 

One of the issues you gotta watch out for (if you are looking to get the most ethanol %) is the actual ethanol content - it varies station to station I guess.  You can buy test kits so you can see how much ethanol is actually in the E85.

Edited by SkiDooNick700
  • Like 1
Posted

105, it can very a bit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Yes, i did hear that it can vary ok but it only safe to use in flex fuel motors. Wish I could use it on my new 6.2 ha


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

105, it can very a bit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Yes, i did hear that it can vary ok but it only safe to use in flex fuel motors. Wish I could use it on my new 6.2 ha


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted


Yes, i did hear that it can vary ok but it only safe to use in flex fuel motors. Wish I could use it on my new 6.2 ha


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You don’t need it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

You don’t need it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


I know, ha


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Posted

Why does he not need it, I have a 6.2. The extra 30hp is a nice change. 

 

E85 is 105 octane, the 85 part is that it is 85% ethanol and 15% gasoline. Winter blend affects E85 as well, I have seen it go down to E60 during the winter months. The testing kits are ok, but they are not accurate at all. I get my data from the flex fuel sensor itself. We have a local gas station that carries the higher grade fuels and they make sure to carry full E85 year round at the same price the other places are charging.

Posted
Why does he not need it, I have a 6.2. The extra 30hp is a nice change. 
 
E85 is 105 octane, the 85 part is that it is 85% ethanol and 15% gasoline. Winter blend affects E85 as well, I have seen it go down to E60 during the winter months. The testing kits are ok, but they are not accurate at all. I get my data from the flex fuel sensor itself. We have a local gas station that carries the higher grade fuels and they make sure to carry full E85 year round at the same price the other places are charging.


Oh NO NO NO! 6.2’s are NOT Flex Fuel compatible


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
Why does he not need it, I have a 6.2. The extra 30hp is a nice change. 
 
E85 is 105 octane, the 85 part is that it is 85% ethanol and 15% gasoline. Winter blend affects E85 as well, I have seen it go down to E60 during the winter months. The testing kits are ok, but they are not accurate at all. I get my data from the flex fuel sensor itself. We have a local gas station that carries the higher grade fuels and they make sure to carry full E85 year round at the same price the other places are charging.

I’ve always had a tune, caned tune. The 5.3 with the yellow cap every thing to use it is already in place to take advantage of E85. I just used the tune for the transmission, top speed and cylinder deactivation. On the 6.2 you’re already running a little advanced on the timing requiring high octane fuel. Add to that E85 is not always 105 octane, so the gains of going through the effort is suspect. If I’m going to risk my warranty for power I’m going with a blower.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted (edited)

Here comes that e85 debate that happens every time someone mentions running e85.... :lurk:  There are thousands of NA 6.2 Camaros, Corvettes and Trucks running e85 with shown gains. As long as you have a good e85 tune and a sensor so the pcm can adjust the fueling for the different blends you are just fine running e85 in the 4.3, 5.3, and 6.2

 

Miata 6.2 swap NA running e85 and showing dyno results when running e85.

 

Edited by Gorske
Posted
Here comes that e85 debate that happens every time someone mentions running e85.... :lurk:  There are thousands of NA 6.2 Camaros, Corvettes and Trucks running e85 with shown gains. As long as you have a good e85 tune and a sensor so the pcm can adjust the fueling for the different blends you are just fine running e85 in the 4.3, 5.3, and 6.2
 
Miata 6.2 swap NA running e85 and showing dyno results when running e85.
 

I think you miss understood. I saw gains with my 5.3 with E85. My truck was E-85 compatible stock. The 5.3 is tuned to run on reg gas so putting E-85 allows more increase timing and a real seat of the pants feel. The 6.2 is tuned to run on premium fuel. So there wouldn’t be room in the timing tables for a real noticeable feel. E-85 is like buying a boxed of chocolates, you really don’t know what you’re going to get. You can tune the 6.2 to get gains on premium fuel too. My point was you’ll feel it more with the 5.3 starting at the reg fuel timing verses the E-85 timing. Got it?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted (edited)
28 minutes ago, KARNUT said:


I think you miss understood. I saw gains with my 5.3 with E85. My truck was E-85 compatible stock. The 5.3 is tuned to run on reg gas so putting E-85 allows more increase timing and a real seat of the pants feel. The 6.2 is tuned to run on premium fuel. So there wouldn’t be room in the timing tables for a real noticeable feel. E-85 is like buying a boxed of chocolates, you really don’t know what you’re going to get. You can tune the 6.2 to get gains on premium fuel too. My point was you’ll feel it more with the 5.3 starting at the reg fuel timing verses the E-85 timing. Got it?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sorry was not aimed towards your post. More of a in general to past threads about e85 on NA vehicles. Also just a nice video to show what kind of gains you can see on e85 when properly tuned with a sensor. Plus I think it's a pretty sweet build :)

Edited by Gorske
  • Like 1
Posted

During normal fueling, it can take 3 or 4 tanks of fuel to get the full alcohol content of ethanol after switching off of gasoline.  My local Sunoco is carrying an unknown brand E85 and it has an 80% alcohol content.  Last 3 tanks were 80%, first 4 varied and kept increasing until the gasoline was all gone.  

Posted

Hopefully I will be able to put an E85 kit on my 2019 when I get it.  That is if it will be able to be tuned at all and GM doesn't lock the ECM down.  Then it will be a matter of time before someone cracks it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,915
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    ChristopherDobson
    Newest Member
    ChristopherDobson
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,241 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monthly payment is only part of the equation. With today's prices and interest rates, I'd look at the total monthly cost: payment, insurance, registration, fuel, maintenance, and expected repairs. A vehicle that fits comfortably into your budget is usually the better choice than stretching for a higher trim. I've also kept my vehicles longer over the past few years. New cars have gotten expensive enough that driving one for 10+ years, while staying on top of maintenance, often ends up being the most cost-effective approach.
    • 10 Ford and Chevy engines proven to reach 300,000 miles   You may note a common 3K OCI on this list of gas motors. I skipped over the diesels. Dh'O. 
    • Thanks newdude!  By the time manual selection is needed, I'm probably too much of a control-freak to depend on the transmission sensing braking to activate automatic downshifting.  I would be anticipating the situation and already be manually downshifting.   This truck replaced a 2004.5 LLY diesel with the Allison 5-speed.  Putting it in T/H made noticeable differences (when the torque converter locked, upshift points, downshift behavior).  On this 2024 gasser with the 10L1000 I haven't been able to detect much, if any, difference.  Ok, I can never tell now when the torque converter locks up.  But I also don't notice differences in shifting.  For downhills, I've probably already manually downshifted by then anyway.  Since it's also more awkward (than the 2004.5) to engage/disengage I don't even bother.  Or maybe it doesn't really matter with just a 3k lb. camper in the bed?   Thanks also for the list of reasons the charging system might select various voltages.  However, what I am seeing doesn't fall into any of those categories.  It very definitely, and very consistently, rises after coasting/braking.  Maybe not immediately, but not very long after coasting/braking.  Very consistently drops voltage when no longer coasting/braking.  It might also be interacting with the camper battery charging (I might disconnect the camper and see if it changes the charging behavior).  I also need to recheck turning on headlights for when I want to force it to charge the camper.   Another JR, in June I converted the camper to LiFePO4.  Since it's not a good idea to try to charge lithiums directly using truck, I installed a Victron Orion XS DC-DC charger (which BTW is AMAZING!!).  Being cheap, I only had to buy that one item (besides the battery, of course) to do the conversion.  The camper OEM 120v battery charger (only 19 years old and works perfectly) and the truck feed the input to the DC-DC charger (not at the same time).  But I didn't want the camper charger feeding back to the truck so I kept the old separator.  I considered replacing the separator with a 30amp diode but that means more work and might add another 1/2 volt drop.  One thing that surprised me was the voltage drop over the long 10awg wire run, so I can only charge smoothly at 8 amps (because the DC-DC charger is completely configurable).  Another reason I don't want an added voltage drop with the diode.  I might also be a little lazy but all this work is being done under the sink with a small cabinet opening.    
    • apparently CA smog is (or at least was)  checking that the vehicle is using the oem and/or a ca smog approved tune, so I expect you'll fail inspection doing it.
    • yes, leaking exhaust will mess up o2 sensor readings, which in turn messes up fuel trims.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...