Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, Dmouton said:

There was a lot behind the GMC because it's so large. I also took Sierra off but it wasn't near as hard as the GMC. I used an eraser wheel attached to a drill. Made it really easy. On my other truck I sat there and rubbed it off with my fingers and after a while it's not so pleasant on the fingers. Eraser wheel first then sprayed a gunk remover and wiped clean. Don't leave any scratches. Bought mine on Ebay for $6. 

Screenshot_20200320-175947_eBay.jpg

Just ordered one...

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Hi everyone, I'm fairly new to trucks but i am interested in getting a camper for my standard bed 79". Would campers from other sierra and silverado campers fit on the new 2019-2020 trucks? Or if other campers from other truck models fit if they're the same width and length? Trying to look for budget friendly used camper when the opportunity comes up. Thanks in advance. ?

Edited by gsp_phong
typo/grammer
Posted
2 hours ago, gsp_phong said:

Hi everyone, I'm fairly new to trucks but i am interested in getting a camper for my standard bed 79". Would campers from other sierra and silverado campers fit on the new 2019-2020 trucks? Or if other campers from other truck models fit if they're the same width and length? Trying to look for budget friendly used camper when the opportunity comes up. Thanks in advance. ?

If you find one I'm sure it wouldn't fit properly or look very well. 

Posted

Leer 100XQ was installed last Friday. First thing I noticed when I opened the cap rear door were the concealed, flat door hinges. Online videos I viewed of the 100XQ showed the "C" hinges, like on the ARE Z2. Those videos were pre-T1 GM trucks. When I closed the cap rear door, I noticed the obvious, Leer has a new mold for these T1 100XQ's, at least this Multi Pro Tailgate model. The top of the cap is no longer smooth all the way across. The contours start at the front of the cap, inline with the two main truck cab contours, and run the full length of this cap to the back. The center section of the cap is lower than the outer sides, height matches much better to the cab/spoiler. The contours run directly over the hinge mount location. That may be why these new 100XQ's have the flat exterior hinges as compared to the previous"C" hinges. Clearance/mounting issues with the "C" style hinges in this contour area. 

Overall fit is good, the bottom edges of the cap are smooth, no obvious chips or cracks. Paint color match is also good. Rear door closes okay and it fits the Multi Pro Tailgate.

Ordered this with the Leer plug and play T connector. A thank you to ShamrockShooter for that advice back on page 2, I had no idea that connector was available. No warning messages or other display screen/electrical issues so far, have not tested a trailer connection yet.  

I will try to post 2 sets of pics, some with this post showing side and rear view, more on a future post showing views of the cap top shape. First attempt trying to post pics..

1148237513_100XQSideView.thumb.png.d334597693066d00035cc1f558d2631a.png

762673289_100XQRearView.thumb.png.0b546940855e6982534de707b60f644e.png

801417421_100XQRearAnglewLadderMultiPro.thumb.png.f67242f019322ea645642625157b0aab.png

  • Like 1
Posted

Pictures of the Leer 100XQ Multi Pro top views

2057356460_100XQTopRearMoldContours.thumb.png.1c7f36a5bf7cedacaa3a2062e8a156f2.png708062858_100XQTopContoursFromBacktoFront.thumb.png.d6dd6813b9597deb45acc2b27d1d0371.png1560987473_100XQCapMeetsCab.thumb.jpg.e5dd82f2871005e9adad1295aaaa0c54.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

I almost ordered the rack system on mine but never needed before. 

Posted

I had the same style rack system on my previous Leer 100XL and could not believe how much I used it. The ability to haul so many different items 8'-12' and longer without needing a trailer makes the cap(and truck) incredibly more versatile. When we head to the cabin the box is frequently full. If needed the rack can easily handle ladders,  lumber, etc. and the utility trailer can stay home. No question I will use the rack more than ever now with the short box on this crew cab! Just depends on how you use your truck. 

Posted

I'm curious if I could add one to it. What's there ceiling of yours look like? I know the center is extra think just don't know if where they mounted yours is. 

Posted

Will post pics of the track mounting, hopefully later today.

  • Like 1
Posted
21 hours ago, Dmouton said:

I'm curious if I could add one to it. What's there ceiling of yours look like? I know the center is extra think just don't know if where they mounted yours is. 

Here are the pics. Black rubber domed screw holders up against the inside cap carpeting likely have a threaded insert(?), they don't appear to be snap-on covers over a nut, but they could be. Either way, a threaded screw going down through from the top into an underside fastener. My old XL100 just had a flat washer and a nut on the underside from the factory, these new parts are much nicer(and softer on my head). Mounting dimensions:  1) tracks are 46.125" apart on center; 2) actual track length 58.5"; 3) track end caps are 1.5" long each end; 4) cross bars are 56" wide flat mounting surface between the end covers, about 58" with end covers. There is a rubber seal between the tracks and the cap. Cross bars are easily adjustable for width. According to the dealer this is the Thule Tracker system (old style square bars). These old style cross bars are vinyl or rubber coated and are incredibly strong. There may be some wind noise at high speeds, but it was never noticeable in my 2010 Silverado LTZ. The bars remove very easy anyways, when not in use they can ride in the box if wind noise becomes an issue. The newer aero bars are stylish and have all types of accessories that mount to them, but I have no need for any of those. Adjustable forward/back mounting brackets tighten down with 2 allen head fasteners. 

Appears to be an easy job if you have someone to hold up the inside "nuts" for the track screws. I don't know if they use some type of sealant or not for the screw holes, I did not see any visible sealant on these. Never had any leak issues on the XL100 track screws. 

 

187594314_ThuleTrack.thumb.jpg.2690b53d7a6d566a10254662585cef40.jpg368167813_ThuleTrackEndCap.thumb.jpg.9e615857e7da43b2bf4e9e2c8237fdef.jpg2058735979_ThuleTrackMountingBracket.thumb.jpg.6d2c29c3f50cd42f0dee388b0b3c78c6.jpg1625407446_MountingBracketCover.thumb.jpg.c3fa4321dc34a8f5234757d4ee96e89c.jpg1858499413_ThuleTrackUndersideFasteners.thumb.jpg.18f9633028d5975cbe0b28a1af566a14.jpg

 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 3/14/2020 at 3:28 PM, RJay678 said:

Thanks nycen. Will look forward to those pics when you get a chance to post them. I could not find a single ARE dealer in my area who had a Revo in stock so I could look closely at that curved back glass. Seems like most ARE and Leer dealers in the area are happy to handle 2 or 3 cap styles and know very little about the rest of the caps from that company. There just aren't that many choices in caps for these new style GM trucks. But there definitely are more choices available than a year ago. Bought the new truck in mid January. I was shocked at the limited number of caps available when I started looking. Thanks to this forum and the amazing amount of information provided by the members, I was able to find out far more than I could from either Leer or ARE. My thanks to all of you members, this forum rocks! 

Enjoy that great looking truck and cap of yours!

Sorry for delay. Been slammed. 

F061F039-3E9B-4ECA-9642-85586B57ADCC.jpeg

93BC06DB-7A19-410B-8754-671DF728D257.jpeg

BEB7DC79-671F-4788-8A22-3D31942945E8.jpeg

  • Like 2
Posted
8 hours ago, nycen said:

Sorry for delay. Been slammed. 

F061F039-3E9B-4ECA-9642-85586B57ADCC.jpeg

93BC06DB-7A19-410B-8754-671DF728D257.jpeg

BEB7DC79-671F-4788-8A22-3D31942945E8.jpeg

Thanks for the follow up pics! That smooth, curved, rear glass looks awesome.  ARE did a great design look with the entire cap. Beautiful truck and cap combination. 

Posted
10 hours ago, RJay678 said:

Here are the pics. Black rubber domed screw holders up against the inside cap carpeting likely have a threaded insert(?), they don't appear to be snap-on covers over a nut, but they could be. Either way, a threaded screw going down through from the top into an underside fastener. My old XL100 just had a flat washer and a nut on the underside from the factory, these new parts are much nicer(and softer on my head). Mounting dimensions:  1) tracks are 46.125" apart on center; 2) actual track length 58.5"; 3) track end caps are 1.5" long each end; 4) cross bars are 56" wide flat mounting surface between the end covers, about 58" with end covers. There is a rubber seal between the tracks and the cap. Cross bars are easily adjustable for width. According to the dealer this is the Thule Tracker system (old style square bars). These old style cross bars are vinyl or rubber coated and are incredibly strong. There may be some wind noise at high speeds, but it was never noticeable in my 2010 Silverado LTZ. The bars remove very easy anyways, when not in use they can ride in the box if wind noise becomes an issue. The newer aero bars are stylish and have all types of accessories that mount to them, but I have no need for any of those. Adjustable forward/back mounting brackets tighten down with 2 allen head fasteners. 

Appears to be an easy job if you have someone to hold up the inside "nuts" for the track screws. I don't know if they use some type of sealant or not for the screw holes, I did not see any visible sealant on these. Never had any leak issues on the XL100 track screws. 

 

187594314_ThuleTrack.thumb.jpg.2690b53d7a6d566a10254662585cef40.jpg368167813_ThuleTrackEndCap.thumb.jpg.9e615857e7da43b2bf4e9e2c8237fdef.jpg2058735979_ThuleTrackMountingBracket.thumb.jpg.6d2c29c3f50cd42f0dee388b0b3c78c6.jpg1625407446_MountingBracketCover.thumb.jpg.c3fa4321dc34a8f5234757d4ee96e89c.jpg1858499413_ThuleTrackUndersideFasteners.thumb.jpg.18f9633028d5975cbe0b28a1af566a14.jpg

 

Thanks for all the info. Very detailed which helps out. So it does look like the screws are on the outer edge away from that extra thickness support in the center. That's what I was wondering. I didn't know if they extended the extra thickness all the way to the edge for support of the roof rack system. Very helpful. May add one later to mine.

Posted
On 3/10/2020 at 8:40 PM, Dmouton said:

Yes I removed the words Leer that was right above the handle. The emblems are still on the side just because they are sunk in and don't want the empty indention where they would be. Yesterday I also removed GMC and Sierra off the tailgate. 

20200309_122544.jpg

The eraser wheel was a life saver. Wife says she don’t like it but I like the clean look. Sierra and SLT may be next.

1E19B58F-7892-436C-B5B7-B3F91D8E306A.jpeg

  • Like 1
Posted
On 3/23/2020 at 12:22 PM, RJay678 said:

Leer 100XQ was installed last Friday. First thing I noticed when I opened the cap rear door were the concealed, flat door hinges. Online videos I viewed of the 100XQ showed the "C" hinges, like on the ARE Z2. Those videos were pre-T1 GM trucks. When I closed the cap rear door, I noticed the obvious, Leer has a new mold for these T1 100XQ's, at least this Multi Pro Tailgate model. The top of the cap is no longer smooth all the way across. The contours start at the front of the cap, inline with the two main truck cab contours, and run the full length of this cap to the back. The center section of the cap is lower than the outer sides, height matches much better to the cab/spoiler. The contours run directly over the hinge mount location. That may be why these new 100XQ's have the flat exterior hinges as compared to the previous"C" hinges. Clearance/mounting issues with the "C" style hinges in this contour area. 

Overall fit is good, the bottom edges of the cap are smooth, no obvious chips or cracks. Paint color match is also good. Rear door closes okay and it fits the Multi Pro Tailgate.

Ordered this with the Leer plug and play T connector. A thank you to ShamrockShooter for that advice back on page 2, I had no idea that connector was available. No warning messages or other display screen/electrical issues so far, have not tested a trailer connection yet.  

I will try to post 2 sets of pics, some with this post showing side and rear view, more on a future post showing views of the cap top shape. First attempt trying to post pics..

1148237513_100XQSideView.thumb.png.d334597693066d00035cc1f558d2631a.png

762673289_100XQRearView.thumb.png.0b546940855e6982534de707b60f644e.png

801417421_100XQRearAnglewLadderMultiPro.thumb.png.f67242f019322ea645642625157b0aab.png

Quick question. No interference with the 4x4 emblem on the side? When I ordered mine the guy at the place seen my X31 badge and said “hopefully there won’t be an issue with that.” It looks close but not hitting? If there is, I can just remove it beforehand. Thanks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,121 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...