Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

285/70/18 with the NV +18 fit my 2017 great with no rub.  I plan the same wheels on my ‘21.

 

Whoops , 285/65/18

 

F3192BEF-1239-400A-99C6-BED3661C58D0.jpeg

Edited by The Gibson
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 5 months later...
Posted
On 7/29/2021 at 10:00 AM, Kanon Morris said:

Any recent updates from folks who’ve added bigger tires on STOCK AT4 w/ 18” wheels?

295/70/18.....like to try 305/65/18

Posted

This doesn't meet the thread title criteria but here's mine. 

Method 317 in 17"x8.5" - 0 offset

305/70R17 Nitto Ridge Grappler

 

Had to do a mudflap delete and some trimming.

2DC8A02F-3DFF-4986-845B-8A8D7F584BFB.JPG

31B2534D-E443-4F3F-B46D-93FEEB05D581.JPG

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 11 months later...
  • 2 months later...
Posted
On 1/16/2023 at 7:57 PM, ShortMag said:

Picture above is 295/70R18 Recon Grapplers on a stock 2019 AT4. No rubbing 

Can you show the front on this set up? Any UCA rubbing? 

  • 6 months later...
Posted

Hello,

I have a 24 Sierra AT 4 1500 diesel and I was wondering if I can fit 17” or 18” rims with 33” tires.

i really like the look of what the raptors have and would like that look without going up higher to a different lift. I don’t mind adding maybe a one inch spacer and some trimming, I just don’t want to go to a 3” or 4” lift kit.

Any advise is greatly appreciated!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The BORA 3/8" spacers arrived yesterday along with the extended lug nuts. I got the front wheels changed out today, but was overheated and covered in sweat so bad, I figured getting both front wheels done was a win, and took a cool shower. Hopefully, I'll go out tomorrow morning before it gets into the 80+ temps and do the backs. After getting the first wheel snugged up, I backed out one of the lug nuts then hand turned to count threads. I believe I stopped counting around 12-13, so I think I'm good there.    
    • My fullsize truck is averaging over 26mpg so I'm pretty happy with the increased fuel economy targets. When I had my gas Silverado (2020 5.3) it was averaging 21. Again, for a fullsize truck, that's very different from the 12-15 these things used to get 30 years ago.   Whine all you want, increased MPG is a good thing.
    • That is a fair point, and I think an OBD-first proof is probably the right next step. I agree that the value is not the hardware box by itself. The marketable part would be the software: always-on capture, baseline learning, event reduction, system-specific reports, and alerts. Also agreed that if an OBD device is always plugged in and has local storage, it should not miss the event in the same way that a scanner plugged in after the fact would. The only thing I would not want to assume yet is that an ELM327-class device gives all the late-GM data needed at the rate needed. Standard OBD live data, DTCs, freeze frame, Mode 6, VIN, and calibration information are definitely the right starting point. GDS2 also proves that a lot of useful ECM data can be viewed through the DLC without needing a DTC first. The question I need to test is whether the data needed for a useful GM V8 event report is actually available through the DLC, and at a useful sample rate: - misfire counts / roughness by cylinder - AFM/DFM state - oil pressure and oil temperature - fuel trims - voltage / reset context - U-codes and communication events - calibration / software information - whether these are standard PIDs, enhanced DIDs, Mode 6 data, GDS2-only data, or not available So I think the right benchmark is: 1. Build the OBD-only version first. 2. Keep it plugged in and logging locally. 3. Compare it against GDS2 / freeze frame / HP Tuners or another higher-end logger. 4. Measure which parameters are available and at what update rate. 5. Only justify ECM-side hardware if it captures useful evidence the OBD version cannot. So you may be right: the consumer product might simply be an always-plugged-in OBD event recorder with much better reporting. A question for you: when you say ELM327 devices can already deliver all the data needed, do you mean generic OBD Mode 01 data only, or GM enhanced data as well? For a useful GM V8 report, would generic OBD data be enough, or would you expect the tool to include enhanced items like misfire by cylinder, AFM/DFM state, oil pressure/oil temp, U-codes, and calibration information?
    • 87 down as low as $5.14 here... winning!
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...