Jump to content

'15 1500 Gear swap


Lance Bowman

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm considering lifting my 2015 1500 and putting it on 33s. My Jeep friends tell me I should switch to 4.10 gears. Are they correct, or is there a better option? Also wondering if I need wheel spacers to run 33x12.5r18 on a 18x9 Fuel Anza rim?

Posted
19 minutes ago, Lance Bowman said:

I'm considering lifting my 2015 1500 and putting it on 33s. My Jeep friends tell me I should switch to 4.10 gears. Are they correct, or is there a better option? Also wondering if I need wheel spacers to run 33x12.5r18 on a 18x9 Fuel Anza rim?

What engine?  What trans?  What gear ratio does it have now?  Any other mods now?

Posted

5.3L and the 6L80E. Unsure of the gear ratio, most likely the stock 3.08. No mods, its compleatly stock

Posted
I'm considering lifting my 2015 1500 and putting it on 33s. My Jeep friends tell me I should switch to 4.10 gears. Are they correct, or is there a better option? Also wondering if I need wheel spacers to run 33x12.5r18 on a 18x9 Fuel Anza rim?
You will be fine. You will read on here most people who go up to 33's have no issues. If anything a high quality tune will be fine. Keep in mind trucks that come with stock 285 45 R22 wheels/tires.. That is a 32.1" tall tire. Keep in mind jeeps come stock with really tiny tires and LOW gearing and there is usually a need to regear. Not required on these trucks. I would say anything 35" and taller you may want to consider it. I am going up tona 285 55 R22 (34.5") and everyone who runs that says its fine.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Posted
8 minutes ago, acinquegrana said:

You will be fine. You will read on here most people who go up to 33's have no issues. If anything a high quality tune will be fine. Keep in mind trucks that come with stock 285 45 R22 wheels/tires.. That is a 32.1" tall tire. Keep in mind jeeps come stock with really tiny tires and LOW gearing and there is usually a need to regear. Not required on these trucks. I would say anything 35" and taller you may want to consider it. I am going up tona 285 55 R22 (34.5") and everyone who runs that says its fine.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 

Thanks! It has 265/75/r17s on it now, which are 31" tall, so its not that big of a jump in tire size. Who makes a quality tune for these trucks?

Posted
Thanks! It has 265/75/r17s on it now, which are 31" tall, so its not that big of a jump in tire size. Who makes a quality tune for these trucks?
I hear good things about diablo. You can input your tire size, upgrade to 93 fuel and do so many other things. You can even send it out to a company called diablew and he makes custom tunes. There are many other options thats just the first thay came to mind.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Posted

The 3.08 ratio sucks with any tire larger that stock, but it's pricey to do a gear swap (especially if you're 4wd).  If you're 2wd I would highly consider jumping up to a 3.73 gear ratio with a 33x12.5 tire, your truck will be pretty gutless and hunt for gears under light acceleration with the 3.08s.

 

You can get a tune or mods to gain HP, but you will always be at a mechanical disadvantage with such a numerically low gear ratio.  3.08s should have never been offered in a full size truck IMO, 3.42 should be the minimum.

Posted
1 hour ago, pewterliftedz said:

The 3.08 ratio sucks with any tire larger that stock, but it's pricey to do a gear swap (especially if you're 4wd).  If you're 2wd I would highly consider jumping up to a 3.73 gear ratio with a 33x12.5 tire, your truck will be pretty gutless and hunt for gears under light acceleration with the 3.08s.

 

You can get a tune or mods to gain HP, but you will always be at a mechanical disadvantage with such a numerically low gear ratio.  3.08s should have never been offered in a full size truck IMO, 3.42 should be the minimum.

We could go back to the 80's.  My 1982 GMC K2500 (6.2 Diesel and TH-400) had 2.56 gears.  It would cruise very nicely at 60-65.  

These new transmissions really make up for a low rear gear.  3 speeds vs 6,8 or even 10 is no comparison. 

Posted
20 minutes ago, Logan Lanfear said:

We could go back to the 80's.  My 1982 GMC K2500 (6.2 Diesel and TH-400) had 2.56 gears.  It would cruise very nicely at 60-65.  

These new transmissions really make up for a low rear gear.  3 speeds vs 6,8 or even 10 is no comparison. 

While this is true you still cant account for the extra centrifugal mass added by the rims and tires with an extra gear or three in the trans. Sure youd be fine but leta face it these trucks are dogs in comparison to even the late 80s and 90s with 3.08 gears. And diesel engines really dont like high rpms down low is where they thrive and come to life over a gasser. Adding lower gears makes it easier on the trans and can have a positive or negative effect on mpgs that most are concerned with.

Posted
59 minutes ago, Logan Lanfear said:

We could go back to the 80's.  My 1982 GMC K2500 (6.2 Diesel and TH-400) had 2.56 gears.  It would cruise very nicely at 60-65.  

These new transmissions really make up for a low rear gear.  3 speeds vs 6,8 or even 10 is no comparison. 

I've had various truck with different tran/rear gear combos from 4l65e with 4.56s to 8L90 with 3.23s, and a bunch in between.  I will say that that lack of torque of 5.3 combined with big tires and 3.08s will suck in town, highway will be fine cruising.

Posted

3.08 sucks even with stock tire. If you’re gonna lift it and put bigger tires on it then regearing is a huge benefit. Up to you if you wanna pay for it

Posted

I should have noted too that I have a z71 with 3.42 gears... So definitely not as bad as the 3.08.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Posted
4 hours ago, pewterliftedz said:

The 3.08 ratio sucks with any tire larger that stock, but it's pricey to do a gear swap (especially if you're 4wd).  If you're 2wd I would highly consider jumping up to a 3.73 gear ratio with a 33x12.5 tire, your truck will be pretty gutless and hunt for gears under light acceleration with the 3.08s.

 

You can get a tune or mods to gain HP, but you will always be at a mechanical disadvantage with such a numerically low gear ratio.  3.08s should have never been offered in a full size truck IMO, 3.42 should be the minimum.

My truck is 4wd. Would I be able to swap 3.73s in without changing anything else (differential, axle housings)?

Posted
43 minutes ago, Lance Bowman said:

My truck is 4wd. Would I be able to swap 3.73s in without changing anything else (differential, axle housings)?

No, you will have to swap carriers.

Posted

The carrier is part of the gear assembly. It’s not any big deal. 3.73 is a good choice. You should go and talk to a shop and have them run the actual numbers, so that you can see exactly what rpms your truck will be at at each speed. 4.11 is not unheard of at that size, but is a lot of gear for a daily driver, that has been at 3.08 OEM. Look at the numbers and be honest with yourself as far as your goals. If you’re driving a 6.2 liter truck (you’re not) with the 9.76 inch rear end, then 3.73 is the largest you can go without swapping out the internals completely.

Even at only 3.73, you’re going to be amazed at the difference in your trucks performance. It will be very pleasing. Your mileage may actually improve, it will quit hunting for gears and you will get actual use out of the higher gears in the transmission without speeding on the highway...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.3k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,716
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    BDS my HD
    Newest Member
    BDS my HD
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 585 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Hello hello looking forward to expanding my knowledge of the 2026 2500 HD that I just bought.   Truck has 3500 miles on it four-wheel-drive crew cab and I’m about to put a 6 1/2 inch BDS lift on it 18 x 10 -25 offset with 37’s   Already have the wheels and tires just waiting on the lift install in about three weeks   Question what surprises am I not gonna be happy with?  I’m not new to lifted trucks so I know that acceleration towing gas mileage all that is affected..   Question is those of you that have this truck this powertrain with a 10 speed Allison and have done the mods that I’m doing,,, how bad is it? Is that Allison constantly gonna be hunting for the right gear to go into? And what about towing, acceleration, fuel consumption as mentioned?    Lastly how come I can’t find any ring pinion gear set up for these axles and when could I expect to see them?   I apologize if there’s any typos I’m doing speech to text on my iPhone.    
    • I've got a 2013 2500 6.0L Flexfuel. Drove the truck earlier today with no issues. Went to run an errand tonight and noticed key fob wouldn't work. Figured battery was dead, so replaced fob batter. Still wasn't working. Grabbed my other set of keys with the other fob and that one wasn't working either. So I manually unlock truck and insert key. Interior lights come on, dashboard lights up, turn key and truck starts. Turn truck off, like a moron, and try starting again. This time no crank, no click, no nothing. Lights still come on and dash lights up, but now I'm getting a service 4wheel drive, service tire monitor, etc. Check voltage on battery and Im showing 12.2v. Throw my battery charger on it and give it 15 mins and try starting again. But still no crank no start. Decide maybe its a bad battery, run to autozone grab a new one and put it in. Same issue. Disconnect battery and let it sit for 15 mins. Try again and still nothing. I had managed to roll the windows down earlier as its a humid night, but now I can't get them to roll up. Power locks are also not working now. Then randomly I try the key again, and it fires right up. Immediately I roll up the windows as we have nothing but rain forecast this week. I shut it back off wait 30 seconds and start up again. Worked a 2nd time. So turn it off, start putting things back together. Try one more time, and back to no crank no start. And now the car alarm starts going off. Had to disconnect battery and leave it that way for the night as I don't think my neighbors would appreciate my alarm going off again tonight. Any thoughts or help would be appreciated. 
    • No one will care for you like you care for you. Do what you can for as long as you can. IMHO of course. 
    • How about them NICKS!!! 
    • Hi there.  Long time lurker, first post.    i have read the previous posts regarding the water ingress problem with this emblem.  I bought my 1500 SLT the  summer of 2025 new and after reading the MANY problems with these emblems failing I decided to install one anyways.  As per a YouTube video, I sealed ( or tried to) this sign with silicone sealant around the outer perimeter joint and the holes that were already somewhat sealed on the rear plate of the emblem.  And installed the connector assembly using dielectric grease on the connectors. The installation looked great and worked well for about 4 months……then FAILURE.  Grrrrrr…… I live in the great white north and wash my truck weekly in an automatic car wash  to keep the salt off.  Let me tell you that removing the old, failed emblem is a whole different animal than removing the OEM individual letters without removing the grill assembly. Mainly because the illuminated logo is built differently than the original letters which  you can remove the red surface lettering with a knife or some kind of blade which gives access to the tabs which hold the logo onto the grill. So I had to essentially destroyed the old emblem to remove it. Doing so killed my chance of doing somekind of autopsy on the failed , old logo.  But there was plenty of water inside when I ripped it apart.  Prior to installing the new assembly I tried it with the old harness and it works fine.   Does anyone have any insight as to where the water is getting into this emblem? I intend to seal the new logo with slow curing epoxy this time around using a syringe.  I think this newer emblem may be an updated unit which I hope GM got the vendor to fix. It has an October 2025 date on it.    If this one  fails,  I am just going to revert back to the non-illuminated letters….AFTER PULLING THE GRILL.    Any thoughts on sealing with epoxy would be appreciated. Thx!   Doug  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...