Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 5/18/2019 at 5:55 AM, tomleo67 said:

I went with aftermarket ones. they are hard plastic unlike the gm ones in the front which are harder to clean imo. easy install and great fit...

Can you post the link from where you purchased 

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

i did the husky liners on my 2017. bought from amazon. hard abs. took wheel off to make life easier. too about 15mins aside. look great and was not a biggie to install. was cheaper than oem.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Took me 30 min both sides didn’t take wheels off  I have a trailboss so I’m sure the  2inch lift helped and I purchased the OEM ones from the dealer $160.00

  • 4 months later...
Posted

These things are cool looking.  I didn't realize that such a product existed.

 

I may get the Husky version for my new Custom Trail Boss:

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07VMNQ5NX

 

I wonder if they will help with keeping road salt off of some important places?

Stupid road salt (especially the liquid brine) caused the death of my last truck.....

 

I'm also going to try some of that spray-on oily stuff for the underbody.  I have to try something to help the truck survive.  I guess that will include doing winter underbody washdowns periodically.

  • 3 months later...
Posted

Question: I ordered the liners for a 2020 standard cab 2500HD. The part number shown on the accessories website is 84496084. I received part number 84496085. What is the difference? The description on the instruction notification says, "Heavy Duty Trucks Rear Wheel Liners." 

 

The instruction notification also says to request the service instructions sheet from the dealer. They are closed now. I have used the search engine to find the instructions online without luck. If someone has access to the appropriate accessories manual I'd really like to install them before heading out to work tomorrow. If not, no worries, I'll just do it after work.

  • 9 months later...
Posted

So I also want the rear liners. Called my dealer and they tell me that yes, you can buy the liners but gm no longer installs them as at either the dealership or the factory. So, to my understanding and my reps understanding, yes I can buy them but, i have to install them myself

Is it a real pain in the arse to install them?

Posted

I installed the Husky liners and wished I'd purchased the stockers because the Husky liners required lots of mods. After reading this thread, it looks like even the stockers can be a pain to install.  I did pull the wheels on my Husky install because the increased access made things easier.  No matter which one you choose, liners really help the look of a white truck.

New Truck.jpg

  • Like 1
  • 2 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,121 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...