Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 minutes ago, Donstar said:

I think it would be very hard to convince someone they were colorblind if they were diagnosed unexpectedly as an adult!  My wife and I have been trying to select some new flooring and I suspect one of us has a problem between what is grey and what is brown.  I know I don't have a problem! 😉   With respect to my brother-in-law, his colorblindness works for him.  He can distinguish between colors he likes and those he doesn't.  The names he gives many colors are ones we apply differently.  He has his own truth!

 

I respectfully disagree. He does not have his own "Truth" but he does have his own "Facts" or his own "Reality". Again color is defined by wavelength not perception. But who am I to choose another' s reality? 

 

That aside, why do people explain the color of the sky to one born blind?

 

We were looking at some cars the other day and saw this white one. White, gray and black are not colors. They are tones and shades that contain ALL wavelengths or none or something in between. Yet white is almost always tinted, as is black for that matter, when it comes to paint. A distinction my wife does not see until the level of tint would be obvious to the blind. Harsh? LOL. 

 

This particular car has a subtle blue cast to it and pearled. I though it stunning but she only saw white and is sick of white cars. (Dizzy is white and a pain in the ......) There is no explaining this to her....

  • Like 2
Posted

I am intentionally being silly but If a colorblind person attaches a name to a color that is inconsistent with the popular name,  it doesn't mean the truth isn't being told.  It is like my bilingual friends using vert and green interchangeably.  Of course, the fallacy with my logic is a colorblind person will be inconsistent with naming colors of equal wavelength.  If s/he was consistent then the individual probably failed a significant part of a pre-school curriculum.  😉 

  • Like 2
Posted
35 minutes ago, Donstar said:

I am intentionally being silly but If a colorblind person attaches a name to a color that is inconsistent with the popular name,  it doesn't mean the truth isn't being told.  It is like my bilingual friends using vert and green interchangeably.  Of course, the fallacy with my logic is a colorblind person will be inconsistent with naming colors of equal wavelength.  If s/he was consistent then the individual probably failed a significant part of a pre-school curriculum.  😉 

 

The humor of serious people gets by me at times. Maybe it is because words are a hot topic button for me. I understand the difficulty of conveying an idea and having it received as sent. 

 

I use to know a women that "loved" her husband. Fanatical about telling him that frequently and needed to hear it herself constantly. Thing was, her definition of "love" was the same as that for ice cream. She "loved" ice cream too. She obtained this definition from, was molded by the culture we live in. It's kind of what a dictionary says about the word and it's roots. When you love something or some one in this way you..."fall out of love" and "fall into love' the same way you do a flavor of ice cream. You enjoy it intensely and immensely until you eat so much of it you tire of it, then....you just find a new flavor. She just liked her husband and enjoyed him. To her, love, like, lust, enjoy are all the same words that differ only in degree. She's had about 12 now.

 

Here's a more sobering take on this word: 

 

The Christian Greek Scriptures mainly employ forms of the words agape, philia, and two words drawn from storgeʹ (eros, love between the sexes, not being used). Agape appears more frequently than the other terms.

Of the noun agape and the verb agapao, Vine’s Expository Dictionary of Old and New Testament Words says:

 

Love can be known only from the actions it prompts. God’s love is seen in the gift of His Son, I John 4:9, 10. But obviously this is not the love of complacency, or affection, that is, it was not drawn out by any excellency in its objectsRom. 5:8. It was an exercise of the Divine will in deliberate choice, made without assignable cause save that which lies in the nature of God Himself, cp. Deut. 7:7, 8.”—1981, Vol. 3, p. 21.

 

It is this definition of Agape, Principled Love that the Bible uses almost universally when give instruction to husbands and wives as to there roles and behaviors within the bounds of marriage. The arrangement was to be forever. Compare Gen 2:24. 

 

Vines then says love is a act, not a feeling and one that is performed regardless of the actions of the target of that act. Based in moral correctness which is defined by Gods will not some 'like of ice cream'. And yes it is accompanied by warm feeling. 😉 

 

It's complicated until it isn't. 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

I'm not smart enough for all the above mentioned stuff, but it's interesting.  However..., can the truth ever evolve, not because of new facts though.  Like in this crazy world (spoken like an old person) when a boy who doesn't want to be a boy and then refers himself as non sexual, and all the HR people at work are shoving down our throats how to address that person, not as a boy, but as a they or whatever, pretty soon there are no boys and girls.    Maybe color will be too offensive to some and green won't be green it will be 5.66x1014Hz.   I know way too extreme, but.... 

Posted

After yard work this morning. I had a hankering for an alien invasion movie. The wife had left so I go a little out there. So sometimes I pick a subject close my eyes and hit ok. This movie was supposedly a real end of times documentary. How it ended up in alien invasion, I can’t say. Ok so I go with it. It was based on the Bible and of course right up to the present dead on. No surprises I go to church and all that. According to this documentary it’s almost over. 20-50 years max. If any big earthquakes start acting up. Or volcanoes. That new 700 HP Ram will be in my driveway. From now on I’m reading the explanation of the program first. That was scary.

Posted
2 hours ago, SILVER SLED said:

I'm not smart enough for all the above mentioned stuff, but it's interesting.  However..., can the truth ever evolve, not because of new facts though.  Like in this crazy world (spoken like an old person) when a boy who doesn't want to be a boy and then refers himself as non sexual, and all the HR people at work are shoving down our throats how to address that person, not as a boy, but as a they or whatever, pretty soon there are no boys and girls.    Maybe color will be too offensive to some and green won't be green it will be 5.66x1014Hz.   I know way too extreme, but.... 

 

This is what happens when everyone gets to determine for themselves something as simple as the meaning of a word. Imagine waking tomorrow and finding out that sometime over the night right became left and left, right but only for SOME people. Now go driving. That stop lights only mattered on Monday and Friday but what you call the day was up to each driver?

 

It's why we made the 'social contract' called education. Oh wait!  kjfi; fjiod/e025hk 0gna0d0g kd9agn kj9i0j i9 iadoto9h a0ght0ery6 645e3e, right?  Oh, does that offend you? Well..=98394h5j, favo9d aoadnfh 9 ao  You understand ??

Posted
40 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

This is what happens when everyone gets to determine for themselves something as simple as the meaning of a word. Imagine waking tomorrow and finding out that sometime over the night right became left and left, right but only for SOME people. Now go driving. That stop lights only mattered on Monday and Friday but what you call the day was up to each driver?

 

It's why we made the 'social contract' called education. Oh wait!  kjfi; fjiod/e025hk 0gna0d0g kd9agn kj9i0j i9 iadoto9h a0ght0ery6 645e3e, right?  Oh, does that offend you? Well..=98394h5j, favo9d aoadnfh 9 ao  You understand ??

I get it.  
I used the color (green) because color can be broken down to math, like the frequency for green I mentioned.  hopefully that won’t be offensive.  

Posted
28 minutes ago, SILVER SLED said:

I get it.  
I used the color (green) because color can be broken down to math, like the frequency for green I mentioned.  hopefully that won’t be offensive.  

I wasn't busting your chops. Green is a great example but the roots run deeper. Much deeper.

 

I didn't want to touch the HR problem with a 10 foot pole. :crackup:That topic is forum toxic me thinks. But I got it. 😉 

  • Like 1
Posted
54 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

I wasn't busting your chops. Green is a great example but the roots run deeper. Much deeper.

 

I didn't want to touch the HR problem with a 10 foot pole. :crackup:That topic is forum toxic me thinks. But I got it. 😉 

I didn’t think you were busting my chops.  It’s all good. 

  • Like 1
Posted

I also place a high importance on words and appreciate that others can be be far less careful.  "You always...",  "you never..."  bug me especially when these words appear together in unpleasant domestic confrontations.... I thought of "gospel truth" this morning as a peckish synapse contribution.  Is this a special classification of truth?  Is the truth in question dependent on spiritual beliefs?  

Posted
10 hours ago, Donstar said:

  Is the truth in question dependent on spiritual beliefs?  

 

Jesus in prayer to his father says, "Sanctify them by means of the truth; your word is truth". (John 17:17)

 

James 1:17 Says further, "Every good gift and every perfect present is from above, coming down from the Father of the celestial lights, who does not vary or change like the shifting shadows.

 

Malachi 3:6 lastly makes this note: “For I am Jehovah; I do not change..."

 

God says what he means and means what he says. No ambiguity.

 

Now as far as what people believe.....I think the last year taught us all that it can have little to do with the truth. If your belief aligns with the truth then..... But when your belief does not align with the truth it does not change the truth.... And we circle back to green. LOL 

  • Like 1
Posted

Truth - a fact or belief that is accepted as true. (Google/Oxford Languages)    I appreciate that the truth is indisputable.  The color green is green.  In everyday use, truth can mean different things and not be wrong or a lie.  Yesterday, I brought up a term popular when I was in elementary school.  "Gospel truth"  I guess it was like our term for "absolute truth".  As an aside, last night I was watching some US Marine boot camp videos.  There certainly is no disputing the meaning/clarity of words there! 😉

  • Like 1
Posted

As much as appreciate a good dictionary I don't always agree with it. For instance Oxford implies the truth has to be accepted to be true. A fact or belief is true only if accepted as true? 

 

The common sense part of me struggles with that. It would mean things like gravity did not exist before Sir Isaac Newton. The God did not exist before his creation accepted him. 

 

I do understand however that people like to 'believe' truth is...what shall we say....flexible? It gives one certain latitudes in behavior. Example is the color humanity gives to lies. Culture accepts "little white lies" as being something different from a "bald face lie" or an "out right lie". 

 

An interesting part of a speech Christ gave to a crowd that included the  Pharisees or religious leaders of the Jews

 

John 8:44:

 

 

"You are from your father the Devil, and you wish to do the desires of your father. That one was a murderer when he began, and he did not stand fast in the truth, because truth is not in him. When he speaks the lie, he speaks according to his own disposition, because he is a liar and the father of the lie.

 

That last part I highlighted bold gave me pause. If Satan is the father of the lie and father means 'life giver' then there was a time before it's birth where we did not consider for one second if something needed acceptance to be true. Where every word was true. This also means that truth is not subject to interpretation, or view point. 

 

Dad was Army. He use to say something like, "The Army will snatch stupid out of a boy". He would say this sort of thing after you pretended you didn't hear him or understand him. As I got older he did this thing where he would tap me on the arm before speaking and as soon as you made eye contact.....yea....can't say you didn't hear them them, eh? 

Posted

Film STRENGTH is fictional

 

What are Coloumb friction and Stribeck friction? What is the difference  between them? - Quora

 

Film THICKNESS is real

 

Three parameters determine film thickness.

VELOCITY-PRESSURE-VISCOSITY

 

There is no variable for STRENGTH!

 

ANYBODY that says they have a test that can measure the STRENGTH of the FILM missed Lubrication 101. Test such as the Shell 4 ball do not test film STRENGTH nor even thickness. They test the EP/AW additives effectiveness when the film thickness is less than the surface asperity height or missing entirely. 

 

For there to be a scar at all means the film thickness is less than the asperity height. (Surface roughness).

As these sequences compare many oils of the same SAE grade the only BASE oil dependent variable is removed from the equation. AS load and speed are constant the only remaining thing being tested is the additives. Which ones? The ones capable of creating that glass hard barrier that sacrifices itself to save the base metal. Sulfur, phosphorus and zinc. There is no liquid chemical  capable. Even then only if at the right temperature. 

 

Lastly all of them fail in these test. The test does not single out one that has zero scar. That means the load applied is far in excess of any load NORMALLY seen in a running street factory motor. It's kind of the point. The machine is a marketing tool not a testing tool. IF it were then the applied load would be that of a 'normal' motor and nearly all oils would pass the test with ZERO scar. 

 

THINK! 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Drone?

 

Went for a drive late last night after the bustle of hurry home traffic and before sodden drunks emerge. It was stunningly quite. Wind under 3 mph and middle 70's (F). I didn't notice it until I turned off the Interstate and onto a low traffic state road littered with rolling hills and gentle curves and a few small towns without a stop sign one. Perfect for a 45/50 mph stroll on a mild summers eve. At this speed there is zero wind noise over the cabin. 

 

AND there is was! That sound all the fuss is about? Climbing the small grades placing the motor under light load a very low, almost inaudible, nearly imperceptible 'note' which disappears on the level or down hill runs. I put up the DOD display to see if I could hear this horrid 'helicopter' sound as it switches on and off. I can't feel it so I need an indicator of it's working to signal when and what to listen for.

 

YEP!..........I got noth 'n kids. 

 

It took nearly 150K miles of use to get enough tone into the factory pipe to even hear what others talk about as an overly obnoxious helicopter drone of horrific proportions. A sound that sends people to Internet sales dishing out hundreds to rid themselves of this terrible earth shattering noise of the Devil. 

 

Good Grief Charlie Brown!

That?

That is what has you in a padded cell?

The AFM Boogieman? 

Get a grip

:idiot: 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I decided to give it a shot and see what sort of a gong show it would be to a pan drop themed oil change on my 2025 gas truck with the 10 speed. All indications I had seen so far was that there was no way that pan was coming out of there due to the cross over exhaust pipe not allowing enough clearance for the back end of the pan to duck out from under the valve body since it hangs lower than the pan to trans mount flange and certainly the filter does. I never touched any of the exhaust mount hardware at all, be that the engine manifolds to Y pipe, the bracket on the side of the transmission, or the two bolt flange further back behind the trans/transfer case. I put the truck up on four jack stands as there was no way I was going to struggle with that lack of clearance under the truck. The truck was cold as it had sat over night so all the trans fluid had drained to the pan, so I drained the bit of oil that would come out of the level check plug at the bottom near the front of the pan and put the plug back in to reduce the ensuing mess after that. Then took out all but one bolt front and rear and then pushed up on the pan and took out the remaining two bolts and then let the front of the pan tilt and spill out most of its contents into a drain pan. I then popped the pan gasket off its two locating nubs and kicked it a bit to the left side so it was no longer on the flange of the pan to get all the clearance I could and managed to get the pan slipped out of there by swinging the front of the pan to the right but keeping the rear part of the pan inline if not slightly to the left of its mounting flange area and lifting the front of the pan enough to keep the rear part of the pan low enough that allowed the pan to "JUST" slip out without forcing anything. I installed a new trans filter and seal and as per GM instructions on this site I torqued the two bolts to that 44 inch pound goal ( they take an 8 mm socket ) In reversing the pan procedure after I had cleaned up the pan both inside and out completely ( touching the outside of a dirty pan and dealing with installing a gasket at the same time would be a disaster ). First I slipped the pan into place and yes it took me a while as it won't go unless its slid in just at the right angles, then once the back of the pan was into the area of the flange mount, I went and got the gasket and then threaded that through the front of the pan and feeding it under the filter etc and finally working it onto the flange of the pan and lining up the two locating nubs to drop into the pan. Then lifted the pan up into place and get a couple of bolts started and check and make sure the gasket is where its supposed to be as the bolts were being put in. I never used any power tools as I don't have any of the whimsy little drive guns, I use what looks like a small screw driver handle with shank that has a 1/4 drive on the end of it and added an extension and those bolts use a 10 mm socket as some times power tools can bite a person if used on delicate parts ( torqued to 80 inch pounds ). Also should note as per rules around pulling the add plug out first, yes I cracked that loose with a 8 mm Allen bit socket on a 3/8 slim head ratchet as there isn't a lot of room to work with there either due to the exhaust on the right side of the trans.    I already had delco ULV oil on hand and of course the quart bottle pump wasn't made for those small cap threads so I had to use some other containers that the pump would fit and keep transferring oil over into them so a wasted exercise there but indeed the small pump did work just fine as ULV oil is thin and easy to pump in summer time weather. I put in 9.5 quarts as per prior minimum recommendation and yes that cut it pretty close as once I had the truck ( off the jack stands so its level ) and the trans oil up to 167f , about 6 ounces came out but a level kit or what have you could throw it off just enough that it wouldn't be enough oil so probably that 10 quarts is a good amount to put in so one doesn't have to add more oil as when its hot I sure wouldn't want to be adding oil so would have to let the exhaust cool. All I do for warming up the transmission is sit there with it in park and rev it to about 2500 rpm and it takes close to 20 minutes to get it up to that lower limit of 167f, weird how it will warm up more doing that then by driving it, I am not real keen on power braking the truck to get the temp up there and don't seem to have to either. By the way I only have 9000 miles on the truck so probably not a very good payback on doing it that soon and the magnets had such a minor thin layer of fines on them so that was good to see and the color of the oil was a darker red then new oil but still looked very good as it should and I've not done any towing with it so its been living a pretty easy life so far. The filter is made in such a way that its next to impossible to pull out the filter media but there certainly was some fines showing up there which makes sense give the trans having to break in.    I hadn't really planned on explaining this much of what I had done since there are various instruction videos kicking around or I think so, as the gist of my message as that by fluke or what have you, for some reason my truck has just enough clearance to slip the pan out from the trans. Of course there is no guarantee that other trucks like this in general will also allow the pan to be taken out without messing with the exhaust as I expect its probably a crap shoot if it will or won't, I was just happy to find out that mine would work and avoid all the other struggling and possibly damaging things in the process,     
    • Do you fellas think Fog Lamps would  be a good upgrade for our 2024 2500 HD Custom ? As you probably know it did not come with them ,  Would you put in GM Chevy parts ? Do they get wired up to the switch panel ( Upfitter or whatever the correct terminology is ) on the dash ? Thanks
    • You got a 4 legged walker or a 4 wheel rollater?
    • Does lowering the truck change its towing capacity?  I wouldn't mind lowering mine, but I loan it out a few times during the summer for my daughter to pull her travel trailer (5,000lbs).
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...