Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi everyone

just traded my 17 z71 1500 for a 16 2500HD 6.0. I have a case of pf63 filters but the truck calls for a pf48. I know it’s the same filter just shorter. Does anyone know if the pf63 is too long? Thanks

Posted (edited)

Trying to figure out why in my owners manual they list the pf63 for the 5.3 and 6.2. But still calls for pf48 on 6.0... seems odd if only difference is length

Edited by Rich427
Posted (edited)

The 5.3 and 6.2 have different oil system requirements.  PF-63 has a higher bypass PSI vs. PF-48, the 5.3 and 6.2 use a variable displacement oil pump and have AFM, L96 does not.  Both engines are of different families too, the 5.3/6.2 being Gen V LT, the 6.0 still being Gen IV LS.   

Edited by newdude
  • Like 1
Posted

I don’t get why GM supposedly stated that the pf63 would replace pf48 in any application

Posted
25 minutes ago, Rich427 said:

I don’t get why GM supposedly stated that the pf63 would replace pf48 in any application

Because it does.  The L96 in your truck is a Gen IV engine, same as my LC9 and i run the long filters with no problems.  While I have used the PF63E, I do not like the paper construction, preferring the K&N HP2011 with the 1" nut to make removal easy peasy.  It also flows more oil, has a higher micron rating and much higher burst pressure.  The paper fibers clog the screen under the oil pressure sensor in AFM equipped trucks like mine.  Not sure if yours has the screen but it certainly doesn't have AFM.  Use up your PF63s then get something better.

Posted

See document ID#4785111-TSB-17-NA-157 about the use of oil filters on these trucks. You can do as you wish, its your truck, but GM built it and warranties it so I would be  inclined to follow their own recommendations rather than all the experts on these forums.Sure the 63 will spin on and physically fit but they are not the same internally.

Posted

Yes I’m going to stick with the pf48. I called some local Chevrolet dealers and the service dept told me they list the pf63 for that truck but I spoke with ACDelco on the phone and they told me it’s not the same filter and now after reading the specs on the bypass it’s pretty cut and dry. Guess there’s a reason they are still listing the pf48 for this engine. Thanks

Posted



PF64 and PF63 Filters



The PF64 and PF63 (Fig. 20) filters are commonly confused as an ACDelco PF48 and/or PF48E filter because both oil filters have the same appearance and oil can size. However, these oil filters are not the same and have different internal bypass valve opening pressure specifications. The PF48/PF48E has a pressure specification of 15 PSI (100 kPa) while the PF64/PF63E has a pressure specification of 22 PSI (150 kPa).



Posted

The bigger deal is really, if your truck spec'd a PF-63, don't put a PF-48 on it as it may cause issues.  Going from PF-48 to PF-63 shouldn't hurt really.  

Posted
On 6/14/2019 at 5:42 AM, mjm-1957 said:

See document ID#4785111-TSB-17-NA-157 about the use of oil filters on these trucks. You can do as you wish, its your truck, but GM built it and warranties it so I would be  inclined to follow their own recommendations rather than all the experts on these forums.Sure the 63 will spin on and physically fit but they are not the same internally.

That document does not apply to the L96, a Gen IV motor.

Posted

Reread the TSB, clearly states L96,  is included in the bulletin, fifth engine mentioned in the upper right of the TSB. You can use anything on your truck you want, I'm just saying be careful because I have been a line mechanic in a GM dealer for 44 years and have never seen GM get so picky on warranty claims. They require documentation of maintenance records, calibration files and now pictures to TAC and PQC, and will deny a claim for the smallest reason. Your playing with fire if you think your going to win against them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Looking for advice from this group. Took my flawless 2020 6.2 TB to an unnamed shop for routine rear brakes and oil change. Tech forgot to put oil back in after the full service and needles to say, destroyed my engine.  It’s all on their shop video so they are responsible.   I had my Chevy dealer do the analysis and they confirmed its compromised and said engine replacement. The manager said they only get GM reman engines from GM with full 3 yr warranty and the one they would put in is not same as what’s they are swapping out on 21-25 for recall.    I am looking for advice why that would be a different engine because obviously I had the good 6.2 year and replacing it has my concerns with that recall for 21-15   Also what’s the pros and cons of accepting the engine swap vs telling the shop that bricked the truck to pay up so I buy a new truck. I’m concerned about stigma resale eventually if I just decide to get rid of it after the swap or other issues showing up after the swap out.  
    • Just looked up my records.  I've never gone over 5000 miles between oil changes.  At 46K miles, I have 10 oil changes.  I hope that will help.  I also installed the disabler last year.  I've still had a few times when it didn't seem to engage (which I can tell because the start stop feature kicks in), but for the most part, I think it's working.  For some reason, GM did not include the number of cylinders running in the information screen like I had on other models.  In my Cadillac, it shows me when it's running on 4 cylinders on the fuel milage screen.  I can't find that on my '21 Denali.
    • you might read through the info on gmupfitter.com for your truck, to find a good power source.
    • Melling I believe is/was the OEM on the lifters who explored this problem some years ago. The white paper they generated on the topic indicated two items of note when I read it. 1.) They only fail on the switch. Prevent the switch, prevent the failure. 2.) The majority fail due to deposits messing up the timing of that switch. Anyway that's what I got from it.    Mine have always been active, 195K+ now, and my oil maintenance is surgically clean.    Of course this assumes good parts. That is no heat treat issue or machining flaws. I get comfortable that these issues are in the rearview mirror by about 30K. IMHO naturally. 
    • Yes, the key seems to be with the half tons that if it has the Z71, then it definitely has the two speed. What got me was that the two speed AND the lower geared towing package option could not be chosen together the last few years unless it was mated up to the 6.2. Want the 3.0 duramax and 3.73 tow gears ... nope, can't get the two speed transfer case ( neighbor son realized that after he had bought his used 3.0 half ton .. where the frick is the low range ? ! ).    I am still unsure which truck series, the half ton or the HD truck that the original poster is referring to for sure other than yes his question is in the HD section of this forum but that doesn't guarantee the question got asked in the right section.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...