Jump to content

2018 Sierra Denali ride height


Pt187

Recommended Posts

Posted

I recently picked up a 2018 Sierra Denali 6.2 4x4. It had 23k miles. Appears to be 100% stock. 
 

My question is what is the factory rake supposed to be?  My rear is a little over 4” higher then the front. It don’t seem normal to me and I want to level it but I have no idea how to since the big difference. It has the magneride. I don’t know if the previous owner did something to raise the rear that much or if this is normal for these. I’m used to seeing a 2-2.5” rake. Not this much. Any help would be appreciated. 
 

 

 

  • Replies 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
9 hours ago, Pt187 said:

I recently picked up a 2018 Sierra Denali 6.2 4x4. It had 23k miles. Appears to be 100% stock. 
 

My question is what is the factory rake supposed to be?  My rear is a little over 4” higher then the front. It don’t seem normal to me and I want to level it but I have no idea how to since the big difference. It has the magneride. I don’t know if the previous owner did something to raise the rear that much or if this is normal for these. I’m used to seeing a 2-2.5” rake. Not this much. Any help would be appreciated. 
 

 

 

Post a picture

Posted

Yeah that doesnt look right

 

Can you post the measurement from top of tire to bottom of wheel well, get one for front and for back, should be able to tell you which side is “off” then so you can inspect.

 

or maybe

 

bottom of front air damn to ground

and

rear bumper step to ground

 

pick one and I’ll reference mine. Denali should have same ride height from any other truck, just the shocks are different

 

 

Posted

I did the top of tire to bottom of wheel well. 
 

 

front 5”

rear 9”

 

 

Posted

Ok I’m in for the night. Prolly do it tomorrow. If somebody else sees this and has factory ride height on the same wheelbase feel free to do it for me.

Posted

Post a picture of the rear block under the leaf spring and the rear shackle at the rear of the leaf spring that connects to the bracket on the frame.

 

Someone could have installed a rear lift block or lift shackle to raise the rear end up higher.

Posted
1 hour ago, truckguy82 said:

Ok I’m in for the night. Prolly do it tomorrow. If somebody else sees this and has factory ride height on the same wheelbase feel free to do it for me.

Thank you 

Posted
31 minutes ago, CamGTP said:

Post a picture of the rear block under the leaf spring and the rear shackle at the rear of the leaf spring that connects to the bracket on the frame.

 

Someone could have installed a rear lift block or lift shackle to raise the rear end up higher.

I’ll get those tomorrow during the day. I did look at them and they look stock. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Pt187 said:

I did the top of tire to bottom of wheel well. 
 

 

front 5”

rear 9”

 

 

Front 6"

Back  8", on my non altered 18.

Measured on the drivers side.

Posted
20 minutes ago, JimCost2014 said:

Front 6"

Back  8", on my non altered 18.

Measured on the drivers side.

What the?!  
 

I measured driver side also. On factory 22” wheels if that matters. 
 

I don’t understand why mine is so high. 

Posted
25 minutes ago, Pt187 said:

What the?!  
 

I measured driver side also. On factory 22” wheels if that matters. 
 

I don’t understand why mine is so high. 

Have factory 22's on mine also.

 

I will check again tomorrow when it is light out, but I am pretty sure of the numbers.

 

Check the shocks for leaks, when they go bad, they can sometimes freeze in place, which might make sense why you are so far off.

Posted
33 minutes ago, JimCost2014 said:

Have factory 22's on mine also.

 

I will check again tomorrow when it is light out, but I am pretty sure of the numbers.

 

Check the shocks for leaks, when they go bad, they can sometimes freeze in place, which might make sense why you are so far off.

Ok thank you. I will check in the morning.  

Posted
1 hour ago, JimCost2014 said:

Front 6"

Back  8", on my non altered 18.

Measured on the drivers side.

Lol thats the worst response ever

 

now he has no clear problem area!

Posted
35 minutes ago, truckguy82 said:

Lol thats the worst response ever

 

now he has no clear problem area!

I’m confused now lol. I thought it helped me as there is only a 2” rake as opposed to my 4” rake. No?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Ahh, sorry about that - I got some bad info. Newdude is correct. That's what I get for working 13 hours straight ... on my "vacation", lol.   Should've checked the files I had instead of the internet.   Anyway ... this is GREAT news, since this would've been an absolute friggin nightmare to get working.   I don't think the lack of VVT is causing this - you've got another issue. Wiring, I'm betting.   I'm telling you right now, your computer isn't bad. If it worked before the swap, it's working now. You need to do some more (better) diagnostics and figure out exactly what you're missing. Did you test every wire directly at the MAF? Have 5V reference? Ground? If you're reading ZERO g/s, your Hz isn't much use - it's going to be the wrong value anyway. The MAF is not working, and you need to find out WHY.   I got this off the net, so VERIFY first: Pin A: Black (BLK) wire, Circuit 552, serves as the Sensor Return (Ground).  Pin B: Tan (TAN) wire, Circuit 472, carries the Intake Air Temperature (IAT) signal.  Pin C: Yellow (YEL) wire, Circuit 492, is the primary MAF Sensor Signal output to the PCM. Pin D: Pink (PNK) wire, Circuit 339 or 539, provides Ignition 1 Voltage (Power).  Pin E: Tan/Black wire, Circuit 552 or similar, often associated with the Intake Air Temperature ground or signal return.  Global-A list: https://postimg.cc/KKJnQC85    
    • Correct....the end user can't reach to Realtruck directly like they can if they purchase a Bak, Undercover, etc...  It has to go through a dealer.
    • It is 4wd. shop told me it is the slip yoke. But not sure.
    • No, I did not tune out vvt. From what I read it should still be able to run without it, it'll just lose some torque/power.    I can see how that would make it not run correctly, but why would that cause the faulty MAF readings?   EDIT: I just ran a quick test and checked, and as I expected, the computer sees that the VVT cam phaser solenoid is not present, and throws a code for it, and does not try to change the cam angle at all. Commanded position just remains at zero, 100% of the time. This makes me think that the VVT is most likely not the cause of the problem though if anyone has a different/better explanation, I'm all ears.   UPDATE: I was able to find that my scan tool does indeed support reading the frequency (hz) off of the MAF (I thought it wasn't supported but turns out I just didn't know where to look for it). I noticed that regardless of engine state it always however this Is not what I observed with my multimeter. Like I said before, the MAF seems to put out a normal signal during cranking and then the signal drops to a very erratic reading once the engine is running. It seems from what my scan tool is telling me that the ECM is not recognizing this at all, and just reads 0 Hz 100% of the time. This pushes me towards the the PCM itself is faulty. I I have the PCM out of the 2007 donor vehicle, which I may try to connect and program (it's only ~50 bucks to get the software for a one-time programming)
    • Did you tune out the VVT?  07-09 they did not have VVT.  2010-2013 they did.      If you haven't tuned it, its trying to adjust cam timing.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...