Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
18 minutes ago, Black02Silverado said:

GM wouldn't be interested because it would cost them more money.

Except they got in bed with Mobil for the answer, which this might shock you, also costs them money.  So how does Mobil not cost them more money but Amsoil does?  Please explain.

Posted
15 minutes ago, Nitrousbird said:

Except they got in bed with Mobil for the answer, which this might shock you, also costs them money.  So how does Mobil not cost them more money but Amsoil does?  Please explain.

I can't answer that since I don't know the answer.  It is my understanding that GM sells Mobil because they gave them the best deal so that it can be sold at all GM dealerships. So Mobil is making a ton of money that they would not have otherwise. So if it did cost GM then it wouldn't be much since Mobil would be selling that much more. Especially for vehicles out of warranty that GM charges to fix.  Mobil is giving GM a major break on cost.  Going with a completely new vendor would be expensive.  Not to mention GM would have to figure out how to break the contract with Mobil to be able to go with a new vendors fluid.

Posted (edited)

OK being that  the Shudder is caused by the TCC and another trans parameter like allowable slip rpm.  I just completed a TCC disabled tune for my 6l80 via Richard Wardell YT vid, and man this was the main issue on these transmissions. i can say if GM is doing the same lock up patterns on the 8 speeds and 10 speeds. this will cure 80% of your problems.

I am astounded at how much better the truck drives now!! 

 

with tcc is disabled 1-4th gear, my sudden braking to a complete stop has improved and the truck feels like more rear brake bias. i love it! there is less feeling of the engine pushing durring decel. GOOD Stuff. i recommend you guys void the warrantee and extend the durability with this mod

 

 

Edited by flyingfool
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

just drove 100 mile on the tune, and wow! no more clunking sounds in stop and go traffic and she pulls thru the revs better with the non locked converter in 1-4th

 

 

Edited by flyingfool
  • 6 months later...
Posted
On 12/31/2019 at 4:33 PM, newdude said:

No.  Have the latest fluid put in it per GM's procedure.  We've done many and none have come back with a shudder. 

do you have the latest fluid part number by chance?  Mines back to doing the same old, and may have an independent shop do it unless there's something unique about the GM procedure you see only a dealer would be able to do?

Posted
2 hours ago, Srode1 said:

do you have the latest fluid part number by chance?  Mines back to doing the same old, and may have an independent shop do it unless there's something unique about the GM procedure you see only a dealer would be able to do?

Just curious as to how many miles are on your truck?  Would you be interested in using AMSOIL's ATF?  If so PM me your address and I can get you a total cost delivered to your door. 

Posted

I have gone through 3 transmissions and 2 torque converters and I still have the shudder problem and this is just on my 2015 Silverado Z-71 6.2 with 182,342 miles. The dealer is kind enough to replace under warranty. I also have a 2018 Silverado Z-71 6.2  8spd that has the same shudder. Fluid has been changed and next step is torque converter.

Posted
16 hours ago, halld59 said:

I have gone through 3 transmissions and 2 torque converters and I still have the shudder problem and this is just on my 2015 Silverado Z-71 6.2 with 182,342 miles. The dealer is kind enough to replace under warranty. I also have a 2018 Silverado Z-71 6.2  8spd that has the same shudder. Fluid has been changed and next step is torque converter.

I have 80,000 on my '15 LTZ 6.2 and the shudder is back.  After fluid change/flush (done 3 times now on GMs dime).  It seems to be worse in warmer weather, was doing it last Fall and disappeared on it's own over the Winter and is now back.  I'm going to check some local shops (not dealers) to see what they have to flush the system like a dealer would and what fluid they would use.  I could do it myself but have too many other irons in the fire to mess with it right now.  Sure is disappointing GM hasn't addressed this - I would be hard pressed to buy another truck from them at this point, certainly not without a change that I can see for long enough doesn't have shifting problems.  Having friends / family along for a ride in this thing is embarrassing at times.  What a mess

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

When everyone refers to shudder, what exactly do u mean? My truck will sometimes shake inside, possibly called shutter, and the console will shake back and forth. At 75k or so the trans made a clanging sound while driving like the converter had rocks in it. Dealer changed out the fluid and that noise disappeared but I always had the shake like an out of balance driveshaft or something. Local mechanic said he would change trans and converter. I am unsure what to say...

Posted
14 hours ago, Ge0rge said:

When everyone refers to shudder, what exactly do u mean? My truck will sometimes shake inside, possibly called shutter, and the console will shake back and forth. At 75k or so the trans made a clanging sound while driving like the converter had rocks in it. Dealer changed out the fluid and that noise disappeared but I always had the shake like an out of balance driveshaft or something. Local mechanic said he would change trans and converter. I am unsure what to say...

The Shudder feels like you are driving over rumble strips, a fluid change including flush of torque converter should fix it for a while.  Changing the transmission and converter will not do anything any more lasting than the fluid change/flush - it's a design problem.  

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I used Lubeguard and then a Motorcraft friction modifier as suggested by my transmission shop. The shudder was gone after the Motorcraft additive but is back.

The GM service guys cannot tell me if the new part number for the torque converter is a redesign or not. They just don't seem to care.

An after market billet converter is going to be expensive. The OEM converters are to light to take the heat.

I may sell my truck. Been a GM guy since the 80's. 

I have a '16 LTZ Z71 with 114k miles on it. Leaking AC, replaced fuel pump, transmissions been out and had converter replaced. The dealership burned up my started changing the converter and lies and said "it happens". Not if you disconnect battery.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...