Jump to content

Hill Stop Assist Question


Recommended Posts

Posted
12 hours ago, poconojoe said:

I like it. In fact, I wish it would continue to hold until you press the accelerator pedal. But It only holds for a few seconds.

I find it useful on steep hills, especially when trailering. Because, even with an automatic transmission, the truck can and will roll backward on a steep hill.

I'm in my 60's and grew up with standard transmissions. I've owned quite a few trucks, cars and hot rods that were sticks. I kind of miss it a bit. They don't even produce Silverados with a stick anymore...that's ashame.

Back in the 80's I had an F250 with that granny (low) first gear. You could let the clutch out and it would roll along without giving it gas. Wouldn't stall, just roll along. Man that thing was geared to tear down a house. Lock in the manual hubs, put it in 4x4 low, drop it in first (granny) gear and the torque was amazing.

I think it is intended to allow for a smooth start and is not intended as a brake or holding device. I assume your brake lights come off when activated and the person behind you is expecting yo to depart.   The stump puller gear was handy for steep hill starts.  However, the subsequent shift to second was sometimes a little less than seamless.  ?  Every time I read complaints about the shifting patterns or lack of predictability of the 6spd/8spd automatics I think of how much these individuals would have loved the 4spd manual c/w bull low.  It was and would still be my transmission of choice.  

Posted
1 hour ago, Donstar said:

 The stump puller gear was handy for steep hill starts.  However, the subsequent shift to second was sometimes a little less than seamless.  ? 

Yep, most if not all of the time, (that is under normal conditions) I would just start off in 2nd gear.

Posted

you actually dont even need to hold the brake pedal down when its active, you can just lightly rest your foot on the pedal and it will hold, I think HSA was designed for women drivers in steep hilly areas . or people who never really learned how to drive a car.  but as long as to can trigger the brake light i think it stays locked

Posted
2 minutes ago, poconojoe said:

Yep, most if not all of the time, (that is under normal conditions) I would just start off in 2nd gear.

Yes, bull low was rarely used but it was a bonus on steep hills or pulling stumps! (I actually used my truck to pull out a stump or two)  I can only guess how effortless a 4 spd manual would be with current engines and technology.  The expression about paddling the boat was true with the old <100 hp engines.  With >300 hp engines, you'd spend a lot less time shifting! 

Posted
1 hour ago, Donstar said:

Yes, bull low was rarely used but it was a bonus on steep hills or pulling stumps! (I actually used my truck to pull out a stump or two)  I can only guess how effortless a 4 spd manual would be with current engines and technology.  The expression about paddling the boat was true with the old <100 hp engines.  With >300 hp engines, you'd spend a lot less time shifting! 

Yeah, and with today's technology and increased gear selection on the automatics, we would probably have 10 or 12 speed manual transmissions in our everyday trucks! That would be fun!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Maybe, but it seems he is the only one that has backed up data to prove what he is stating. I think he is doing this more because he enjoys it and wants to get the information out to us. He's got the knowledge and access to the proper equipment and having the funds doesn't hurt.  I would love to do what he is doing and would do it if and when I hit the Powerball.  I'm not a Tribologist by any means but love to learn what I can.   I would bet there would be doubting people out there if a completely independent lab with high quality work and highly respected in the automotive industry, put out information like this.  The world can't be pleased, one just has to take the information that they are given, do more of their own research to find actual lab data to back up what they are trying to figure/find out.  Most don't bother, they just want to believe what they first see.     I don't have the minimax but my 6.2 in my 2019 Silverado with 64k miles shows excellent UOA results with 0w-20 and for my own purposes 5w-20.  Since not much of a change using 5w. I liked the data sheet information on the SS 5w-20 and figured I would give it a try.  Still the same viscosity at 100℃.   In the end we all just do what makes us happy, life is too short to get upset over trivial social media.   On a side note, I do feel GM has dropped the ball and just cares about the bottom dollar and not quality anymore.  "Like a Rock" has been long gone.  Seems "Built Ford Tough" has as well.
    • Better than stock but that's like putting lipstick on a pig
    • Hello, my 3 month old Sierra Elevation wont recognize a trailer with electric brakes? All the lights work correctly, but no power to the brakes?   This is the factory installed brake controller. If you manually push the knob, the display shows the power % but does not light up like my 2022 silverado.   I have an appointment with the dealer, but was checking to see if anyone else has seen this issue.    Thanks, 
    • Been using SS 0w-20 from new, but wanted to change to the 5w-20 because I liked the data on the data sheet, to me it seems like a little better product. But as you can see, not much difference. This is also with running a mix of 10 gallons E85 to a tank topped with 93. It isn't a flex fuel vehicle so any higher I get a CEL for running lean on both banks. Yes my mileage takes a hit. Instead of 20 mpg I normally get on trips I get 17mpg. This is also using EaO17 filter.  What is amazing is I have the AMSOIL cone filter on it since I have the GM Performance intake installed and that air filter has 44k miles on it.  I just take it out and shop vac it off once a year.  I use the upholstery tool on my shop vac.  Works well.   
    • So, lot's of googling and reading, and a trial fit found, that indeed they hit the newer fatter caliper. I did some re-testing today, and found just 3/16" worth of washers was enough for the wheel to spin freely. I added 2 more on each, and again it spun freely. Tested lock to lock with the 4 washers, about 5/16" not quite the 3/8" Im considering, but pretty close. No issues. I've been looking at the BORA .375" spacers and using extended lugnuts to get back lost thread due to the spacer. All the ET lugs I've seen are all .33" reach inside the wheel lug holes. For those that don't like spacers or think they're unsafe, I think it depends on what type of spacers you're using and making sure you get good quality hubcentric ones, and if you're using bolt on ones, regular mainenance, checking the spacer lugs. Not wanting or needing that much spread. Looking for the minimum that will let me run these rims and tires.  it does look to stick out a little, but I really want put these on. and use the stock all-terrains in the winter. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...