Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
16 hours ago, PBNB said:

I was able to get my Diode Dynamics SS6 fog lights hooked up to the Upfitter Kit.

 

Now that I have all these buttons to use up, I have to start finding things to hook up!

 

image.thumb.jpeg.56b52bb695db971736ebda2bd052b409.jpeg

Looks Good, what bracketing did you use for the lights?

Posted (edited)

I had these lights from my '22 Tundra. They came with the little black angles on both sides and the wiring adaptors for a plug and play solution. The Tundra was kicked down the road but I kept the lights, one of the few good things about that truck! :) 

 

I cutoff the adaptor plugs and made a harness to connect to the upfitter output. The Silverado has a steel bumper rather than all that plastic in the Toyota. I just drilled into the bumper under the grill and mounted these. That part was easy. I can adjust them up and down to avoid blinding people.

 

Here is a link to the kit: https://www.diodedynamics.com/ss6-led-fog-light-kit-for-2022-2025-toyota-tundra.html

Edited by PBNB
Posted

Now that the upfitter kit is installed, I am attempting to use up the buttons.

 

AUX 1 - fog lights

AUX 2 - dash cam

  • 9 months later...
Posted (edited)

What firewall penetration does everyone typically use for the 24+ refresh trucks?  Bulletin 193d for the refresh trucks specifies the firewall penetration on the passenger side behind the battery. While the original 153e bulletin routes across the top of the firewall and through the drivers side.

 

193d requires removing the silver insulation/clips from the upfitter battery power wire and then routing behind the HVAC duct in the cab. That seems like more work when also considering the 4 power outputs from the switches also need to go back behind the duct.
 

It appears it is the same upfitter kit for both pre/post refresh trucks so I’m assuming it does not matter?

Edited by AndrewF
Posted
10 minutes ago, AndrewF said:

What firewall penetration does everyone typically use for the 24+ refresh trucks?  Bulletin 193d for the refresh trucks specifies the firewall penetration on the passenger side behind the battery. While the original 153e bulletin routes across the top of the firewall and through the drivers side.

 

193d requires removing the silver insulation/clips from the upfitter battery power wire and then routing behind the HVAC duct in the cab. That seems like more work when also considering the 4 power outputs from the switches also need to go back behind the duct.
 

It appears it is the same upfitter kit for both pre/post refresh trucks so I’m assuming it does not matter?

 

I won't be a lot of help in giving guides and hints as I never installed the upfitter wiring in my truck as the dealer did it and oddly enough I didn't even request it, the salesman had one of their electrical specialists in the shop do it and I was not charged for it. That to me says someone that is used to doing this install can do it fairly fast as they know the moves. From what I see he bundled the power wire from the passenger battery with the existing factory harness wire that runs along the upper area of the fire wall over to the drivers side and then entered in at the steering column. I have nothing hooked up at the switches though as this was only an upfitter harness and I assume the mini breaker box behind the dash install and yes I had ordered the truck with it so the switch assembly came installed into the lower center of the dash ( being a Chev ) with the special cutout panel made for the switches that the refresh interior situates the switch panel. The harness was sitting under the rear seat in a bag in the tray when I first set my eyes on my ordered truck. Cheap to order with the truck, expensive to buy all the parts after to install it so I hear. 

Posted

Having installed the kit in my 23 Silverado, I would expect that the differences would be a longer wire lead from the buttons to the added fuse box. It is really the placement of the buttons that makes this different. 

 

If one could install the buttons in the same location (left of the steering wheel) it would make the installation a bit easier as you would have to pull all the dash pieces to get to the buttons.

 

But I am sure that is explained in the bulletin and install documentation.

 

When I bought our truck, it was 18 months old. Parts of the kit were in the truck but a few pieces were missing so my salesman went and collected all the clips, fuses, wires, etc.. to complete the kit. The buttons were already installed in the kick panel. I didn't have to remove much to get at the install area so that was a bonus. I like the kit now and I use it all the time. Still planning more use for the remaining switches (3 are unused) but that will have to wait till work slows down.

 

The one thing that comes across as strange about this kit is why GM doesn't just install it but leave the battery connections off so if owners wanted to use it, they would just need to install the battery fuses and away they go! Now with the newer dash design and placement of the buttons, that would make a lot more sense. 

  • Like 1
Posted

I have installed the fitter kit in my 2025 Chevy.   How do you use button 5?

There is no wire? The harness only has four wires.  Can one be added?  The wire diagram shows it.

thanks

Posted

I believe the 5th wire goes to the rear of the roof and allows for something to be connected out the back towards the truck bed. 

 

You should be able to tap into that wire from the little fuse box. "Sw5 Grn/Bl" is the wire according to this picture that I have clipped from the bulletin.

 

image.jpeg.0ea2b2cdbe0b4c1b1bd28413e3f81220.jpeg

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I agree. That`s a LOT of sludge for 12,000 miles. I tossed that out here since this is an OCI thread. There`s tons of people here that do not post.   I used to work on a city fleet. That includes police cars and fire trucks. Lesson is, not to only use the odo for oci. A police car has a ton of hours on the engine for the miles it shows. And, not just idling, directing traffic. They beat on these things.   Course, since it is a Kia, they were gonna use the "100,000 mile warranty" for their OCI.😉
    • CLASS ACTION SUITS?  Does anyone know if there is already a class action suit for the paint - which was to have been fixed, changed in after the 2020 GM vehicles?  Does it look like this?    Just started 3 weeks ago - No help from GM as of yet - Dealer will not assist in speaking with GM on my behalf. Confirmed it is the paint they use along with the way the put it on that causes it to fail.  Clearly a Manufacturer's Defect. 
    • That dog don't hunt. 😏   First, a 2025 with 12K on the clock AND idled for a year nonstop is false on it's face; this is 2026. You can do one or the other but not both.    Second, ENGINE HOURS are absolutely available. The rest is third grade math. Micky Mouse scanner he got out of a box of Cracker Jacks OR an ID10T error.    Third, if they ran it out of oil "Several times" that motor is boned on the first hit.    Does this guy think piling higher makes it stink less? 
    • That's interesting, I assume that would add to the cost of the oil but also I was forgetting to bring up the issue of the low tension rings allowing more oil past which in turn forces the cats to have more oil additives pass through them that wouldn't otherwise so they are creating that problem and of course its all in the name of fuel economy. Mind you the other issue would be the lack of additives that fight the formation of carbon within the piston ring grooves which turn the engine into an oil burner and with in this GM forums case is your average off the shelf Dexos licensed oil, meanwhile the other off the shelf oil being Valvoline's R&P isn't licensed and the only one that is which is that certain Mobil oil that came out recently ( its not even being marketed in Canada ) and only a fraction of vehicle owners are going to be using it out of all the other oils on the shelf or the quickie lube bay that meet the Dexos spec by way of actual licensing.    Also I suspect that its an easy excuse to pool the non turbo DI engines in with the turbo DI engines and design the oil to not have LSPI issues in the most demanding engines and short change the naturally aspirated DI by not offering a higher concentration of additive package they could handle and still not be at risk of LSPI.    I wonder if Amsoil flipped the switch just lately and did whatever packaging designation at the same time as I wonder what oil formulation I would have bought in May, of course I don't know when it was packaged at the factory vs how long it was in storage at the Edmonton warehouse. I know its been said at least in the past that the big players switch over to a reformulated oil but the packaging has not changed until they make that move as well so there is that cross over time where its a new formulation in a predated formula marked package. 
    • Hmm. A real reason to not just use the odometer to determine OCI?    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...