Jump to content

Icon tubular UCA


Recommended Posts

Posted

Who’s running them and what’s your wheel and tire setup? I’ve been having trouble gettin tire clearance so wondering if anyone has it figured out? 

Posted

I ran billet Icons on my Tacoma with the uniball before and never had issues. But recently my friend had an issue with Icon tubulars with Delta joints on his GMC. Literally snapped right off while he was driving on the road and damaged a lot of stuff. You can see right there how his tire is just laying flat in the ground in a parking lot! Not sure if I would recommend them anymore.
48034b20c4cf4c5cfaed1977bce68ab5.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I was told on the phone that those uca's with the uniball are only good for 15k miles max. They have a different style that has a clearance ball joint they prefer for the daily driver the rep said.  

 

So that's why I didnt buy em and just bought a different brand ball joint style for 3 inch and up lifts.  I have 400.00 rough countrys but I dont hammer it offroad , its basically a 3 inch lifted daily driver.

Posted

I would recommend Total Chaos. The only thing is the maintenance on them. If you don’t lube them up often they squeak but they last a long time and great quality.

5ccf92d1c76457d33f059fe0f99cfca6.jpg




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

Actually I would recommend these but only if you’re truly building your suspension.

ed8e48cde62d16533099c2ebcb8e7b62.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
7 hours ago, RadoPhan said:

I ran billet Icons on my Tacoma with the uniball before and never had issues. But recently my friend had an issue with Icon tubulars with Delta joints on his GMC. Literally snapped right off while he was driving on the road and damaged a lot of stuff. You can see right there how his tire is just laying flat in the ground in a parking lot! Not sure if I would recommend them anymore.
48034b20c4cf4c5cfaed1977bce68ab5.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yikes!!! This is the exact setup I've started leaning towards from my Chevy - King 2.5's with ICON tubular UCA.  What in the actual f

 

As an aside do you have any other pictures of his truck pre-Fup?

 

For what its worth the folks over at filthy motorsports look like they recommend the camburgs with king set up per their website.

Posted

Speaking with Accutune, they recommended the ICONs with Delta Joint due to it being sealed and cutting down on a lot of squeeking.

 

I ended up going with the BajaKits UCA with Uniball with Delrin Bushings instead of the polyurethane bushings. Which are supposed to be harder and squeak and have less movement. 

 

Havent got them in yet but their staff was very good to work with over email.

Posted
Yikes!!! This is the exact setup I've started leaning towards from my Chevy - King 2.5's with ICON tubular UCA.  What in the actual f
 
As an aside do you have any other pictures of his truck pre-Fup?
 
For what its worth the folks over at filthy motorsports look like they recommend the camburgs with king set up per their website.


No he actually sent me a video of the aftermath and that was a snapshot from it. Literally on pavement driving less then 5mph and a loud noise and scooted up and the tire fell off. Had to replace the axle and many other parts. The joint snapped right off. Yeah I would recommend Camburg or Total Chaos.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
I’ll be going with mazzulla or kibbetech UCAs

Totally forgot to mention those as well. All solid options. I do like that these are billet UCAs vs tubulars.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 3/29/2020 at 6:21 PM, RadoPhan said:

 


No he actually sent me a video of the aftermath and that was a snapshot from it. Literally on pavement driving less then 5mph and a loud noise and scooted up and the tire fell off. Had to replace the axle and many other parts. The joint snapped right off. Yeah I would recommend Camburg or Total Chaos.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Did your friend find out any more information about how and what happened? I assume he would have reached out to ICON about this problem. Do you know if he'd been putting his truck through stress or is it a daily/street driver?  THX

Posted

That doesn't look like the ball snapped off, but more just popped out of the joint (which to me seems like a very crazy way to fail, like some retaining clip wore out or was never installed), as you can see the ball on the spindle.

Posted
Did your friend find out any more information about how and what happened? I assume he would have reached out to ICON about this problem. Do you know if he'd been putting his truck through stress or is it a daily/street driver?  THX

It was their newer delta joint. Their delta joint is like a ball joint. It’s a steel ball with an integrated threaded bolt that bolts to the spindle. The ball portion was poorly hardened steel and wore out, eventually allowing the ball to completely come out of the upper a arm cup. Everything was installed correctly, just wore down which is the crazy part.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
42 minutes ago, RadoPhan said:


It was their newer delta joint. Their delta joint is like a ball joint. It’s a steel ball with an integrated threaded bolt that bolts to the spindle. The ball portion was poorly hardened steel and wore out, eventually allowing the ball to completely come out of the upper a arm cup. Everything was installed correctly, just wore down which is the crazy part.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Eesh. That’s what I was afraid of. Thanks for the quick response! 

Posted

In looking and looking at stuff for different UCA's I found this video. Very very cool to see the side by side of OEM uppers vs Aftermarket (Camburg).

 

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...