Jump to content

4.8 vs 5.3 swap


Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 2000 GMC Sierra 1500 4x4 with a 4.8 liter in it with 336,000 miles. As I'm surprised it lasted this long I've noticed that its losing power,  and either needs rebuilt or I wonderd if swapping in a 5.3 liter would be direct fit with wiring harness and everything except a tune would be needed. I was thinking of buying a 5.3 liter out of a Sierra or Silverado from 2000-2006. With alot lower miles and putting a Tsp stage 3 cam and springs in the heads and a 9in velocity tsp intake with bigger carboyle ignition coils, and 102cm throttle body. Or should I just do all if that to the 4.8 liter I already have. I understand that the only difference between the two are the crank and tune. I'm just not sure which direction to go?

Posted

The 5.3 drops in, that is not an issue.

 

Your other plans are not well thought out at all though. Those are not really a good combo of parts. Things need to go together otherwise it's going to drive like dog ******.

 

Stock coil packs work for everything. Even a 1000hp engine, stock coils work. Upgrading those is just spending money you shouldn't be.

 

That is a large camshaft. So the cam/springs/rocker arm upgrade is good. Then you need to bump up to a 2800-3200 stall converter. Rebuild the transmission to hold this power because a high mileage 4L60e will just not handle it.

 

You'll need much larger fuel injectors, probably 33lb/hr injectors just to support this power level.

 

The intake and 102mm throttle body are overkill. This engine won't flow that much air, you'd never even come close to needing that throttle body size. The stock throttle body would be enough and the truck intake will make power.

 

A custom tune once all said and done of course.

 

Doing those mods to the 4.8 would still net you a lot less power than doing a camshaft upgrade to a 5.3. More cubic inches is going to give you more power.

 

 

Me personally for a daily driver truck would be less camshaft. The TSP stage 2 is like a 212/218 cam size. Do the valve train upgrades and stuff. Add in some 31 or 33lb/hr injectors, some headers, a good tune and you'd see a good gain in power on the 5.3. It allows you to keep a stock stall converter but still pray for the 4L60e if it's not a fresh unit.

Posted
19 hours ago, CamGTP said:

The 5.3 drops in, that is not an issue.

 

Your other plans are not well thought out at all though. Those are not really a good combo of parts. Things need to go together otherwise it's going to drive like dog ******.

 

Stock coil packs work for everything. Even a 1000hp engine, stock coils work. Upgrading those is just spending money you shouldn't be.

 

That is a large camshaft. So the cam/springs/rocker arm upgrade is good. Then you need to bump up to a 2800-3200 stall converter. Rebuild the transmission to hold this power because a high mileage 4L60e will just not handle it.

 

You'll need much larger fuel injectors, probably 33lb/hr injectors just to support this power level.

 

The intake and 102mm throttle body are overkill. This engine won't flow that much air, you'd never even come close to needing that throttle body size. The stock throttle body would be enough and the truck intake will make power.

 

A custom tune once all said and done of course.

 

Doing those mods to the 4.8 would still net you a lot less power than doing a camshaft upgrade to a 5.3. More cubic inches is going to give you more power.

 

 

Me personally for a daily driver truck would be less camshaft. The TSP stage 2 is like a 212/218 cam size. Do the valve train upgrades and stuff. Add in some 31 or 33lb/hr injectors, some headers, a good tune and you'd see a good gain in power on the 5.3. It allows you to keep a stock stall converter but still pray for the 4L60e if it's not a fresh unit.

 

Posted

Thank you I was wondering if I would really need to upgrade my intake or throttle body, or coils. I probably will go with the stage 2 cam, and bigger injectors, and a tune for the 5.3 and this motor and trans I picked up today only has 97,000 miles on it out of a 2002 gmc Sierra. I really do appreciate the advice. 

Posted

Is there any certain brand of injectors that are better than others?

Posted

Try to source some factory 5.3 flex fuel injectors from a 2002-2005ish Tahoe/Suburban and Silverado. I don't have the part number of the injectors off hand.


Those are 33lb/hr and all the data for tuning can found through other stock tune. It's a pretty common upgrade over the factory 25lb/hr injectors are normally are at their limits with camshaft swaps.

Posted

That first Gen of 5.3/4.8L are goood engines.  Most get to 350,000 miles fine, it's everything else around them that breaks down like the tranny and such. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • A complete delete is the most thorough mechanical solution, but it is also major engine work. On a quiet truck that is still under extended warranty, opening the engine purely as prevention is difficult to justify. A plug-in disabler stops commanded cylinder deactivation, but it does not remove or repair the collapsible lifters, so it should not be treated as failure insurance. I would keep the oil full, document the maintenance, and have any persistent tick, misfire, or loss of power diagnosed promptly. If the engine eventually has to come apart, that is the logical time to compare an OEM-style repair with a complete delete. The right choice depends on the truck’s symptoms, warranty status, expected ownership period, and whether the engine already needs to be opened. We explain that decision in more detail here—full disclosure, this is our own guide: https://www.bluev8.com/blogs/news/do-you-actually-need-an-afm-disabler   One exception: some 2021 L82/L84 trucks have RPO YK9, meaning cylinder deactivation was already disabled in the factory ECM; on those trucks a plug-in disabler is redundant, although the AFM/DFM hardware remains inside the engine.
    • Brought my 2015 Colorado into the dealership to check my touch screen issues, had that ghost touch thing happening. They said I needed a new touch screen and they could either order me one for $500. The lady at the service deck was nice enough to tell me I could order a touch screen online for less, she did stipulate that the touch screen had to be factory OEM, you can't pair an aftermarket screen to my radio seeing it was 2015, it had to be a GM factory OEM only. I found a few on Amazon and Ebay by the numbers on the back of the old screen, DJ080PA-01A GM# 22740886, Some said "OEM" in the description and others just said "Replacement". Would a replacement be the same as a OEM as long as it had the same numbers on the back of the screen? In some of the descriptions they also show different brand names but same numbers, is that an issue?  
    • I have both but typically use the 4 legged walker (wheels on front, ski's on back).   The four wheeler is starting to be used on "longer" outdoor walks.  The 4 legged walker is particularly helpful in practicing good walking posture.  Both of my knees are at different stages of recovery and I'm trying to not develop poor habits.  I can actually manage with a cane but it's very difficult not to favor one leg over the other.  My PT recommends I continue with my 4 legged walker for a while.  Yesterday was four weeks since my last knee replacement and I'm excited about my progress to date.  It has been a hell of a rough journey so far but it is exciting to witness  systematic and continuous improvement.  I went for years watching the decline of my "mobility".  It seems that everyday now I am alerting my wife to something I can do now that I couldn't a day or two ago!  I encourage anyone facing the prospect of knee replacement to share any concerns with others who have had the surgery.  It isn't an instant fix but rather is a considerable amount of short term pain for long term gain.  Recovery time and pain levels vary for individuals post surgery but the end results are typically very positive and I've never encountered anyone regretting having had the surgery. 
    • The lifter issue can be dealt with by shorter oil changes and quality oil IMO.
    • Got heavy rain, hail and light rain yesterday. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...