Jump to content

Engine Knock


Do you have it and when?  

701 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Posted

I had ticking sounds at startup with my 2000 Z28 5.7L LS1, but nothing with my '07 Silverado with the 4.8L. I'm hoping things have improved :withstupid: since then.

  • Replies 184
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

My '03 Z71 Silerado has what sounds like a timing knock at startup (timing to far advanced)...it only has 39000 miles on it.

The gas mileage also sucks running between 13-14 mpg on the highway empty, but gets 12 mpg towing a loaded car trailer.

The tailpipe is also black with soot, so it is pumping the fuel into it, but supposedly it is running fine after being checked...guess I don't buy it. :)

Posted

My 2001 Yukon XL knocked like crazy at cold start up. I added sealant to the radiator and it took care of the problem. Before that I had 3 different GM dealers tell me I had to replace the motor, she ran for another 50,000 before I (my wife) trader her in. Their is a webpage called Piston slap.com that goes further into "pistonslap"

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

To clarify the question about engine knock please note what engine you have.

 

The 5.7L 350 Chevrolets are known to knock on start up. # 1 Main Bearing is getting loose.

You hear a deep knock that hits only a few times and quickly gets softer then leaves as oil is pumped into the main bearing.

Usually above 80,000 miles. No need to panic unless it gets worse. Will run many thousands of miles after first hearing it.

Will be louder the longer the vehicle is parked and maybe not there at all on a short term restart. If it does not get worse I would not worry about fixing it till you have a reason to open up the engine for something else. I put new main bearings in my 1995 Suburban to eliminate this noise at 155,000 miles. Lot of work and you risk causing other issues when you open an old engine and don't do a complete overhaul.

A friend bought this from me and it is still quiet and strong at 190,000.

 

The newer family, 4.8L, 5.3L and 6.0L suffer piston slap on start up. Not all but some do it.

Should only hear this on cold start. The block must be cold. Pistons will rattle till temperature on the piston makes it grow a little and then they are quiet. This one can start when the truck is brand new and do it till you retire the rig.

This noise should go away in 10-15 seconds. If it is longer or does it in all conditions it may be another issue.

Piston slap is worse in cold weather and better in warm weather. It won't shorten the life of your engine.

GM is running short skirt pistons in these engines, just like racers have always done. ( last 20 years anyhow ).

It is hard to run a quiet short skirt piston in a working engine but GM has done it quite well.

They help with Power and Mileage, negative is noise on start up.

Some of you may remember this noise from building high power engines with Forged Pistons in the 60s through the 90's.

The Forged pistons used to need more clearance and made noise on start up.

Have not seen any bearing failures on this family of engines unless they are not maintained.

My 2001 Denali 6.0L had the noise from new till sold with 89,000 miles, I hated the noise. My 2002 Tahoe 5.3L does not have it yet at 80,000 miles, luck of the draw.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I have a 2003 Chevy Silverado 1500 with a 5.3L. I bought the truck used about a year ago and now the truck has 46,000 miles on it. A few weeks ago i noticed a tick coming from the engine, you can here the tick in the truck and u can really hear the tick when you are under the truck. The tick is not as loud when i first start it up in the morning, but after the engine warms up the tick becomes louder. I have also found that while i am driving on the freeway the tick gets very loud when i take my foot off the gas and coast, and i can not really hear it as loud while i am accelerating. I use Valvoline 5w30, and am not really a hard driver. Ive tried different cleaners and stuff and nothing is working. Do u have any idea what it could be or anything that i could try to get rid of the tick?

Posted

No knock at 2000, 01,03 & 04 mileage ranges between 240000 on the 2000 to 35000 on my 04 all are 1.2 T EXT 4x4 used in my electrical business.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 5 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

1990 Chevrolet 1500 regular cab long bed 4.3 manual transmission Scottsdale. 136,000 miles.

 

Truck has had knock at start up since day one.

Posted

Yep i have a 2000 z71 and it clickity clacks on every cold startup. Was told its piston slap and stops when motor gets warm due to the expand and contrast stuff

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thrust bearing is a very small window.  But nice try.   Turbo oil filter?  Haven't seen any failures.  Change your oil more frequently.  Use a better oil than the factory oil.  
    • There is a p/n called out in the one PI that GM has.  Curt 57003 inline load adapter that is used for LED trailers that are having trouble with these newer trucks.  No cutting, no splicing, etc.  GM did update the lighting module around 2023 to better pick up trailers with LED lighting, but it still can happen.     Here's the link to the Curt site for it - 7-Way RV Blade LED Electrical Adapter (Not a Wiring Extension) SKU #57003 by CURT   The PI I am referencing - MC-10208985-9999.pdf   Its not just a GM deal either.  Newer Fords and Rams have this same problem.       In another PI, they recommend that the trailer has a Pollock brand 7 way on it as that is who makes the truck sides for the OEMs.  GM is also big on making sure the trailer is trouble free.  So no wiring issues, all lights are functional, better quality 7 way plug, etc.     The other PI I am referencing - MC-10178359-9999.pdf   The model year range is older but it is the current PI for 2014-2026.  It calls out the Pollock RV HD 7 way they recommend.  
    • That's part of the problem...the EGR has already been replaced, and I've already had the complete intake assembly removed, and the EGR passages were clear at that time. That leaves wiring, PCM, or another variable that I wasn't expecting. Best I can tell, it's not wiring or the PCM, so I'm grasping for straws.   The PCM uses the MAP reading to confirm the requisite loss of vacuum in the manifold when the EGR activates. Since that's vacuum related, it involves a lot of other systems which could play a role.   The overall diagnosis has to be considered too. The fuel lines in the intake had rubbed through and were dumping fuel into the intake, drowning the cylinders in fuel, and putting raw fuel into the sump and cat converter. The fuel system has been fixed but the complete path of damage may not be. If the cat was damaged and melted the internals, it could be partially obstructed and also playing into the EGR issue.   I'm retracing my steps; trying to go back to thinking thinking Horses not Zebras based on the clues I've been given. These engines aren't *that* complex.   Could it be, now that the truck is running well, that carbon and crud from being run with the fuel system in disarray is now dislodging and clogged my clean EGR passages where I can't see?  That's what the code is actually saying. The flow is restricted, dummy. Retrace step 1.   I may just need to remove the lower intake again. Before I do that I'm going to try removing the EGR and running the engine for a few seconds to see if it will blow anything lodged in the egr passages out through the open ports.     That's been helpful in the past. For the spider injector, there's no guarantee I'll get a working one. The spider I have seems fine now that the high pressure fuel line isn't making an early delivery via large hole. SO at least I'm not marooned and looking for one of those.   Row52 (dot com) is also a good one for watching for vehicles at local yards.  
    • Disassembly may be Required!   Every blender makes claims but do  you ponder those claims? What was really said? Was it true?  Motive for saying it? What does in infer?  Is that inference true?    Let's do one.    Claim: Made from shear stable base oils.    What was said: Base Oils are shear proof.   Was it true: Yes.  ALL base oils are Newtonian.    Motive / Inference: To imply the fully formulated product is Shear Proof.    Is the Inference true?: Most fully formulated multigrade oils contain Viscosity Modifiers or VM's, sometimes called VII or Viscosity Index Improvers. There are four types. One is in fact shear proof but it also has a bad effect on extreme cold flow and is restricted to use in specialty oils. A second has limited shear called a 0-5 SSI polymer. Meaning its shear is limited to a range of zero to five percent as reported by the ASTM D6278 Shear Stability Index test. A few high end oils, like Torco SR-5, use them and brag about it profusely. Actually all that use it point it out. The last two shear dramatically and are often marketed as a 'feature' of the product aiding the oil to meet fuel standard requirements of ever stricter rules. One shears more than 5% and the other up to 20%. As you make guess, cost is directly linked to shear down and as such the majority of oils use the cheapest organic polymers sold to make grade and pass stringent tests.    PPD's or Pour Point Depressants also shear a bit, only a few percent and hide inside the 0-5 SSI capabilities.    The blender knows he can not out engineer Stribeck. Physics is not a suggestion. But he can wordcraft the unsuspecting toward believing a false claims INFERENCE. This is LEGAL. It is COMMON, and it is EFFECTIVE.         
    • I don't recall ever dealing with one on an '06 and back. It may not even exist on that. I can't remember for sure.   Any kind of ice in or after the evaporator is normally due to low charge with both a clutch-cycling orifice tube system, and a TXV system.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...