Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

My 2020 Denali went in today for ceramic coating and the guys called me to com e look at it. There are what looks like silver chips all over the side I’ve never noticed. The paint is perfectly smooth and it’s under the clear coat. They attempted to wet sand just to confirm it was under the clear. I have an appointment with GM tomorrow and I’m nervous. Has anyone else had paint issues? It’s white Frost Tricoat.

Posted

Mine seems to be perfect.  I haven't found any defects so far and I'm pretty finicky about my rides.  Best of luck with yours.

Posted

Not with my HD, but I had a 2019 Trail Boss that had paint defects in the hood. The dealer took care of it. 
 

I also work with a guy that had some clear coat issues on his 2017 Denali. He ended up getting 10k over trade value towards a new truck. 

Posted

I haven't seen any defects yet. But I have noticed how easy it chips. In under a 1000 miles, there's already a chip on the hood where I would expect one. But there's another on the fender near the doorline under the driver's side mirror. That's an odd location for a rock chip.

Posted (edited)

I was told the Chevrolet dealership had a better paint shop by the body shop that told me it was under the clear. I scheduled an appointment there today and went by there before lunch. The adjuster agreed that she thought it was under the clear coat, but wanted the manager to look at it. She was extremely friendly. He was immediately hostile and said that there was no way quality control missed that. He asked if I had it painted or something put over the paint and I told him no. He asked why I wasn’t at the dealer where I bought it and I told him that they didn’t have a body shop. He then accused them of putting ceramic coating over dirty paint and trash talked the dealer. He told me to look in the middle of the grille and look at the letters. He said it didn’t say Chevrolet and to take it elsewhere.

 

I drove to the GMC dealer that has a body shop. They couldn’t get it into service today, but the contracted body shop manager looked at it. He said the spots are in the fender flares and that the flares are painted in a different facility. He said he doesn’t thing it’s possible that it’s a factory defect even if it’s under the clear, but take it to service and see what they say. I can’t see them until Monday.

 

I got an estimate from the third party shop to repaint and they guy quoted me ballpark 15k. Is paint really that expensive these days? I’m pretty beat down and hope the manager Monday at GMC is a little more friendly.

Edited by Derek Howard
Posted

Sorry, I would've told him they get built on the same line and shipped on the same train, has he ever been further than mama's kitchen? Unless they can take inventory on every HD combination offered, how can they expect to hold a grudge because you had to go elsewhere for the package that suited you?

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Derek Howard said:

I was told the Chevrolet dealership had a better paint shop by the body shop that told me it was under the clear. I scheduled an appointment there today and went by there before lunch. The adjuster agreed that she thought it was under the clear coat, but wanted the manager to look at it. She was extremely friendly. He was immediately hostile and said that there was no way quality control missed that. He asked if I had it painted or something put over the paint and I told him no. He asked why I wasn’t at the dealer where I bought it and I told him that they didn’t have a body shop. He then accused them of putting ceramic coating over dirty paint and trash talked the dealer. He told me to look in the middle of the grille and look at the letters. He said it didn’t say Chevrolet and to take it elsewhere.

 

I drove to the GMC dealer that has a body shop. They couldn’t get it into service today, but the contracted body shop manager looked at it. He said the spots are in the fender flares and that the flares are painted in a different facility. He said he doesn’t thing it’s possible that it’s a factory defect even if it’s under the clear, but take it to service and see what they say. I can’t see them until Monday.

 

I got an estimate from the third party shop to repaint and they guy quoted me ballpark 15k. Is paint really that expensive these days? I’m pretty beat down and hope the manager Monday at GMC is a little more friendly.

Man what an a$$hole. Does he even know that Chevrolet and GMC are made on the same assembly, there is no way I would let that go he was showing off in front of the woman adjuster.

 

Go back to that dealership and ask to talk to the owner of the dealership if that don't work call GM customer service dept and file a complaint against him and tell them what he said. No way I would let that go.

 

You should have told him after he said "it doesn't say Chevrolet" and you should have said " yeah your right the emblem says GM". 

Edited by Silverado4x4
  • 1 year later...
Posted

I have a 2020 HD High Country Tri Coat White. Has what the dealer calls “stone chips” on the bumper, hood and some very odd places for so called Stone Chips. Ive inspected other same model trucks with different color paint and they don’t seem to have these “Stone Chips”. Seems the Tri Coat White paint/clear coat is extremely soft. Would have thought the clear coat was strong enough to prevent these chips? Anybody else have the same issues? Anybody know if GM I still doing anything to address this problem?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 1 Anonymous, 1,864 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...