Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

In the past, I drove primarily diesels; including a 2016 dually I traded for my current Trail Boss. I tow a CC fishing boat that weighs about 5,500 pounds loaded and certainly don’t need a diesel for that. But, towing with a 1500 after the dually, made me decide I just prefer the HD “feel”. In part, the extra weight increases stability. I owned one HD gasser many years ago (when the 6.0 was 300 hp/360 tq) and it felt adequate.

 

in looking at the new 6.6 gasser, I pulled up specs on the older 8.1 liter Vortec big block. That motor made 350hp / 450 tq (and could be paired with the Allison). So, the new 6.6 with 401 hp/464 tq makes significantly more horsepower and slightly more torque than the vaunted 8.1 big block.

 

i realize the new HD is heavier and larger than prior generations. Nonetheless, I think this gives me more confidence in the adequacy of the 6.6 for my needs. Is anyone towing a similar sized boat and, if so, your thoughts?

Posted

Thank you!! I recall the 6.0 wasn’t very good on gas either. But, I have a company vehicle during the week so I only drive this vehicle recreationally; about 12,000 miles per year.  I loved the torque of the diesel but the LML concerned me due to issues with the CP3 pump; and the LP5, while using a different pump, still comes with increased cost, maintenance costs and complexity. So I think the fuel mileage on the L8T is a reasonable trade off for my use.

Posted

I have a Chris Craft 251 express hard top. 350 straight inboard, rated almost 5000 lbs dry. 2 axle aluminum trailer, full 75 gallon tank, gear, 3 batteries. Only one trip this summer, over an hour drive each way on a winding, hilly road. Pulled like a dream. 2 5/16" ball on a forged, 3" drop insert. A rough measurement was that I still had about a 3/4" rake on a paved, level road. To be fare, my inboard sits almost center over the trailer axles. I would happily be making more trips if the boat engine didn't develope a hiccup on this last trip. Tow mirrors were great, too.

Posted

Thanks so much. That’s a very cool boat and weighs much more than my Tidewater 230CC (about 3,300 dry before gas, trailer, freshwater and fishing gear). Good luck getting things sorted out with the boat engine; Ive heard it said they are holes in the water we throw money into!! LOL!

  • Like 1
Posted

Well as the proud owner of one of those “vaunted 8.1”s with the Allison, I’m a little partial! ? But I test drove a new crew cab High Country. I was impressed with the size, the weight, the cab, the tech, and to an extent, the ride. I was not impressed, however, with the power band on the truck. From a dead stop, my big block will absolutely ROAST my 35” A/Ts and chirp out of 2nd gear. Granted, I have 4.10s, intake, headers, custom true dual exhaust and a canned tune, but I did expect more from the advertised numbers from the 6.6. I floored it coming out of the dealership expecting it to pin my eyes back like the 496 does.... not so much.
 

Higher in the RPM band, it really picked up and THEN it was impressive. So I looked up the torque curves for each engine and confirmed my suspicions. The torque curve on the 8.1 is incredibly flat comparatively. And the 8.1 starts off from idle with 400 ft lbs.  The 6.6 on the other hand, starts around 350 ft lbs from idle but climbs. However, the 8.1 reaches peak torque at 3200 RPM whereas the 6.6 is a little later at 4000 RPM. The big difference other than off the line is the horsepower. Over 4000, the 8.1 falls on its face thanks to a terrible intake design. The new 6.6 is a BEAST over 4000 RPM. I think when tuning companies come out with software for this new 6.6 motor, it will be unstoppable! 

52C2A3FE-FF8F-4AA1-B658-EA5B23D54289.jpeg

7EE24507-B4F9-464C-9D7B-0E1189FB6736.jpeg

Posted

You've also got a TON of torque management on the newer stuff.  They don't want you to roast the tires, (or the rear diff in the process) they want you to have good traction on acceleration. 

Posted

Yup, I bet once the tuners get going, there will be even more happy folks out there.  I am running a 3 stage tuner for my Duramax that are fairly conservative as I don't want to limp the thing (allisons are great trannies but if you push them too hard you'll toast them and limp mode them)  The tunes turn off the torque converter to some extent which makes a huge difference for me.  Not enough to roast the tires unless I power brake, but that would be stupid as the G80 rear diff isn't made to do that and I don't need to spend $2000+ for a new diff.  But getting on it is much more fun now.  I was able to pull on a 3.5L ecoboost F150 from a roll and he was not happy about it as he had intended to cut me off to make a left turn.  Having the top speed limiter adjusted to 120+ also meant I could accelerate strongly all the way thru 100MPH after he let off and so did I. 

Posted

Very cool you have the 8.1. I didn’t mean to imply “vaunted” as a negative. It was a compliment in every sense; that big block didn’t need a lot of technology to make power. Makes sense the displacement produces better low end torque. Hell, I thought my 85 Z28 with the LB9 was impressive making 215 HP from 5 liters. But, comparatively, the 6.6 makes almost 100% more power from a 33% increase in displacement (roughly). I’m looking forward to mine arriving; though it’s probably 10 weeks out.

Posted

No offense taken good Sir! I’m just glad GM is even going in that direction. You are correct, the stock numbers on the 8.1 are pathetic in terms of hp to cubic inches. Raylar fixes that problem, but my kids still have to go to college so I don’t have a 529 Roth for the big block yet ??

 

But, turning the TM off and running a premium tune after you open them up and let them breathe, and the 8.1 reminds you what unbridled instant torque felt like in the late ‘60s/early ‘70s. Puts a smile on my face every time I drive it. I hope the 6.6 does for you and that’s all that matters. 

Posted

I'm just waiting for someone, somewhere to come up with SOMETHING for these engines.

 

The new Ford 7.3 already has a couple companies with tuners out, a couple intake manufacturers, at least 1 header company, Whipple and Procharger are getting ready to release systems.

 

Can't find anything for this 6.6l.......

Posted

GM makes it very hard for the aftermarket companies on purpose. 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Just picked up a 2500 HD with the 6.6, to replace 1500 Sierra that just couldn’t cut it towing my 7500 lb boat, my question is, what is the recommendation for break in period before I hit the road with boat in tow, if any, thanks in advance.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted
2 hours ago, Rmedic said:

Just picked up a 2500 HD with the 6.6, to replace 1500 Sierra that just couldn’t cut it towing my 7500 lb boat, my question is, what is the recommendation for break in period before I hit the road with boat in tow, if any, thanks in advance.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I towed with mine on day 2. IMO people overthink these things. 

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,872 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...