Jump to content

Perspective on 6.6 Gasser

TrailBoss1

By TrailBoss1
in 6.6L Gas V8 (L8T)

 Share

Recommended Posts

TrailBoss1 Enthusiast

TrailBoss1

Posted
Posted

In the past, I drove primarily diesels; including a 2016 dually I traded for my current Trail Boss. I tow a CC fishing boat that weighs about 5,500 pounds loaded and certainly don’t need a diesel for that. But, towing with a 1500 after the dually, made me decide I just prefer the HD “feel”. In part, the extra weight increases stability. I owned one HD gasser many years ago (when the 6.0 was 300 hp/360 tq) and it felt adequate.

 

in looking at the new 6.6 gasser, I pulled up specs on the older 8.1 liter Vortec big block. That motor made 350hp / 450 tq (and could be paired with the Allison). So, the new 6.6 with 401 hp/464 tq makes significantly more horsepower and slightly more torque than the vaunted 8.1 big block.

 

i realize the new HD is heavier and larger than prior generations. Nonetheless, I think this gives me more confidence in the adequacy of the 6.6 for my needs. Is anyone towing a similar sized boat and, if so, your thoughts?

TrailBoss1 Enthusiast

TrailBoss1

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thank you!! I recall the 6.0 wasn’t very good on gas either. But, I have a company vehicle during the week so I only drive this vehicle recreationally; about 12,000 miles per year.  I loved the torque of the diesel but the LML concerned me due to issues with the CP3 pump; and the LP5, while using a different pump, still comes with increased cost, maintenance costs and complexity. So I think the fuel mileage on the L8T is a reasonable trade off for my use.

Stand By Enthusiast

Stand By

Posted
Posted

I have a Chris Craft 251 express hard top. 350 straight inboard, rated almost 5000 lbs dry. 2 axle aluminum trailer, full 75 gallon tank, gear, 3 batteries. Only one trip this summer, over an hour drive each way on a winding, hilly road. Pulled like a dream. 2 5/16" ball on a forged, 3" drop insert. A rough measurement was that I still had about a 3/4" rake on a paved, level road. To be fare, my inboard sits almost center over the trailer axles. I would happily be making more trips if the boat engine didn't develope a hiccup on this last trip. Tow mirrors were great, too.

TrailBoss1 Enthusiast

TrailBoss1

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thanks so much. That’s a very cool boat and weighs much more than my Tidewater 230CC (about 3,300 dry before gas, trailer, freshwater and fishing gear). Good luck getting things sorted out with the boat engine; Ive heard it said they are holes in the water we throw money into!! LOL!

  • Like 1
Rebel Rouser Enthusiast

Rebel Rouser

Posted
Posted

Well as the proud owner of one of those “vaunted 8.1”s with the Allison, I’m a little partial! ? But I test drove a new crew cab High Country. I was impressed with the size, the weight, the cab, the tech, and to an extent, the ride. I was not impressed, however, with the power band on the truck. From a dead stop, my big block will absolutely ROAST my 35” A/Ts and chirp out of 2nd gear. Granted, I have 4.10s, intake, headers, custom true dual exhaust and a canned tune, but I did expect more from the advertised numbers from the 6.6. I floored it coming out of the dealership expecting it to pin my eyes back like the 496 does.... not so much.
 

Higher in the RPM band, it really picked up and THEN it was impressive. So I looked up the torque curves for each engine and confirmed my suspicions. The torque curve on the 8.1 is incredibly flat comparatively. And the 8.1 starts off from idle with 400 ft lbs.  The 6.6 on the other hand, starts around 350 ft lbs from idle but climbs. However, the 8.1 reaches peak torque at 3200 RPM whereas the 6.6 is a little later at 4000 RPM. The big difference other than off the line is the horsepower. Over 4000, the 8.1 falls on its face thanks to a terrible intake design. The new 6.6 is a BEAST over 4000 RPM. I think when tuning companies come out with software for this new 6.6 motor, it will be unstoppable! 

52C2A3FE-FF8F-4AA1-B658-EA5B23D54289.jpeg

7EE24507-B4F9-464C-9D7B-0E1189FB6736.jpeg

Colossus Senior Enthusiast

Colossus

Posted
Posted

You've also got a TON of torque management on the newer stuff.  They don't want you to roast the tires, (or the rear diff in the process) they want you to have good traction on acceleration. 

Colossus Senior Enthusiast

Colossus

Posted
Posted

Yup, I bet once the tuners get going, there will be even more happy folks out there.  I am running a 3 stage tuner for my Duramax that are fairly conservative as I don't want to limp the thing (allisons are great trannies but if you push them too hard you'll toast them and limp mode them)  The tunes turn off the torque converter to some extent which makes a huge difference for me.  Not enough to roast the tires unless I power brake, but that would be stupid as the G80 rear diff isn't made to do that and I don't need to spend $2000+ for a new diff.  But getting on it is much more fun now.  I was able to pull on a 3.5L ecoboost F150 from a roll and he was not happy about it as he had intended to cut me off to make a left turn.  Having the top speed limiter adjusted to 120+ also meant I could accelerate strongly all the way thru 100MPH after he let off and so did I. 

TrailBoss1 Enthusiast

TrailBoss1

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Very cool you have the 8.1. I didn’t mean to imply “vaunted” as a negative. It was a compliment in every sense; that big block didn’t need a lot of technology to make power. Makes sense the displacement produces better low end torque. Hell, I thought my 85 Z28 with the LB9 was impressive making 215 HP from 5 liters. But, comparatively, the 6.6 makes almost 100% more power from a 33% increase in displacement (roughly). I’m looking forward to mine arriving; though it’s probably 10 weeks out.

Rebel Rouser Enthusiast

Rebel Rouser

Posted
Posted

No offense taken good Sir! I’m just glad GM is even going in that direction. You are correct, the stock numbers on the 8.1 are pathetic in terms of hp to cubic inches. Raylar fixes that problem, but my kids still have to go to college so I don’t have a 529 Roth for the big block yet ??

 

But, turning the TM off and running a premium tune after you open them up and let them breathe, and the 8.1 reminds you what unbridled instant torque felt like in the late ‘60s/early ‘70s. Puts a smile on my face every time I drive it. I hope the 6.6 does for you and that’s all that matters. 

nick112288 Enthusiast

nick112288

Posted
Posted

I'm just waiting for someone, somewhere to come up with SOMETHING for these engines.

 

The new Ford 7.3 already has a couple companies with tuners out, a couple intake manufacturers, at least 1 header company, Whipple and Procharger are getting ready to release systems.

 

Can't find anything for this 6.6l.......

Colossus Senior Enthusiast

Colossus

Posted
Posted

GM makes it very hard for the aftermarket companies on purpose. 

  • 2 weeks later...
Rmedic New Member

Rmedic

Posted
Posted

Just picked up a 2500 HD with the 6.6, to replace 1500 Sierra that just couldn’t cut it towing my 7500 lb boat, my question is, what is the recommendation for break in period before I hit the road with boat in tow, if any, thanks in advance.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Limelight Enthusiast

Limelight

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Rmedic said:

Just picked up a 2500 HD with the 6.6, to replace 1500 Sierra that just couldn’t cut it towing my 7500 lb boat, my question is, what is the recommendation for break in period before I hit the road with boat in tow, if any, thanks in advance.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I towed with mine on day 2. IMO people overthink these things. 

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • C/K Man
      Silverado 4500-5500-6500 are they still being produced? Would have sold better as GMCs as well

      By C/K Man · Posted

      There was talk over the last couple of years that the contract to build these trucks between GM and International would not be renewed.  International moved production of all their other trucks besides the companion CV model out of the Springfield plant some time ago when they opened their San Antonio plant.  That left Springfield only building the Silverado Medium Duty, International CV Series, and some Express/Savanna long wheelbase cutaways.  International also put the plant up for sale some time ago.  This all answered my earlier question as to why GM and International did nothing with these trucks since they were introduced, as they had basically become a market 'placeholder' with a finite life.    The Silverado Medium Duty/International CV trucks were interesting combination of a GM powertrain, electrical system, and K2XX Silverado cab with an International chassis that was supposedly designed for a step-van type vehicle they never produced.  They were manufactured in International's Springfield plant along with the IH MV series initially.  When first introduced, there was much talk that the Silverado Medium Duty/CV would eventually get a gasoline engine option along with other upgrades and GM and IH would work on a class 6/7 joint venture truck.  This was before VW bought Navistar out, after that happened no more was said.  Draw your own conclusions...   About the time talk started that the GM/IH joint venture was not going to be renewed, rumors started that GM would develop a new line of medium duty trucks themselves.  The story is the new trucks will be part of the next generation HD's due in 2028, and will still feature a 'straight rail' chassis design that the current medium duty has.  GM views this as a desirable feature that differentiates their truck from the competition.  A gasoline engine option is also expected.  As the current Silverado Medium Duty remains in production until September 2026 and there is still a lot of inventory available do not expect any official word for some time.   I believe GM remains committed to their successful partnership with Isuzu, and all the LCF models will still be available from Chevy Commercial dealers.  Isuzu is on the cusp of opening a new large plant in South Carolina and there is also speculation that this may result in new product for both Isuzu and Chevy Commercial dealers.                  
    • davester
      push to talk button

      By davester · Posted

      drive the truck back to the dealer and complain that the button works.
    • davester
      push to talk button

      By davester · Posted

      drive the truck back to the dealer and complain that the button works.
    • nfisherman
      Software Update

      By nfisherman · Posted

      I have a 2026 2500 HD Ultimate. My phone app says there’s a software update available. It’s something about improved battery management and something to do with the running boards. I follow the instructions for the update but the “Check for Updates” option is greyed out in my settings menu. Has anyone else seen this? How did you resolve it? The help message just says “see your dealer” if the download doesn’t work. I’m just trying to save a trip. 
    • newdude
      Exhaust Question

      By newdude · Posted

      Fuel mileage?  That's all how you use your right foot.  Exhaust will give you sound.   Stock exhaust 5.3 is 2.75" diameter piping.     If the truck is nice and worth putting some $$ into it, I'd go for a Corsa catback.  I had one on my 2019 old body 5.3 and it was just perfect.  Zero drone, just driving around and cruising on the highway you'd think it was stock, but when you opened it up it was like a Camaro with the factory dual mode.  Corsa bumps their catback to 3in diameter.  

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...