Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
So what’s the price range for this? Might consider this once I pay my truck off

Basic whipped kit without much add on.... expect minimum around 8500 if you’re doing it yourself. I went a lil extra mile and in it about 12k. Now I wanna crank it up a lil more and I’m at 20k.... it ain’t cheap.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Posted
50 minutes ago, CajunFries said:


Basic whipped kit without much add on.... expect minimum around 8500 if you’re doing it yourself. I went a lil extra mile and in it about 12k. Now I wanna crank it up a lil more and I’m at 20k.... it ain’t cheap.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

****** idk if I could spend that much that’s a heavy price tag for sure... maybe once I’m done with everything else. (And If my wife doesn’t find out ?)

Posted
13 hours ago, Frankielozano214 said:

That’s one badass upgrade though gotta give u that ??

Thanks man! Appreciate it, had to work some long hours for for a long time it but its done

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 12/16/2020 at 12:05 PM, noel91 said:

Little update so I ended up just putting in the whipple without upgrading the fuel system, decided i wasn't going to run E85, 

and yeah the kit came with spark plugs that we gapped to .20 i went with a custom tune, i had them gapped at .32 or .30 as whipple instructs but the truck would sputter, so my tuner decided to go with .20 and the truck runs flawless also went with the 4.125 pullet which put me at 11pounds of boost   
 

 

2ADFCA09-4AC8-4AEB-925A-6F3532D52C8E.jpeg

3D36AE2F-C3E8-4A83-8B02-635A8AD85301.jpeg

Man NOEL im in the same boat as you , what other mods and what power you put down?

Posted

Sharp truck dude! I am IN LOVE with those Kings. I bootlegged some on an explorer way back in the day and were awesome. I too am curious with what power you're making. We did a Whipple on a 2016 5.3 crew cab a few years ago and I don't think the guy that had the truck ever had it on the dyno. 11lbs sounds healthy! I've thought about dropping a pulley size on my procharger to get a little more boost but I'm at my fuel system's limits - mild cam/dod delete and long tubes do go a long way though! It is one thing I'd highly suggest to support your supercharger btw. Get rid of all the stock top end stuff and beg the wifey for a cam package, you won't regret it. Then while you're in there you go with lt4 HPFP and injectors ?

Posted (edited)

what are the pros and cons of a Whipple vs, the LT4 ??

 

lt4 = $1200  used, any idea if they are defective internally

Edited by flyingfool
Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, flyingfool said:

what are the pros and cons of a Whipple vs, the LT4 ??

 

lt4 = $1200  used, any idea if they are defective internally

I don’t think they’d be defective as much as it’s just a used supercharger. EBay has their surprises though! Yeah cost might be a lot less than a BNIB aftermarket supercharger. But when you buy aftermarket new it comes warrantied, everything you need is already there and you won’t have to piece a kit together. With an LT4 sc, once you get all the parts you need to do the swap, you’re in it for a small fraction less than if you went with a new, aftermarket kit. This is besides the fact but still something to consider.


Another thing to note is what aftermarket manufacturers do to enhance their designs from their competitors and O.E spec stuff (I.e how their designs dissipate heat/keeps temps down more, how much air they can move, how fast they spin, how much more power/tq they make etc.) as opposed to their competitors and stock designs. Whipple can also write the tune specific to your truck or give the option to tune it yourself and save a little money while the lt4 sc you’d have to find someone to tune your truck (or diy) and write a custom tune. I would highly doubt a stock lt4 map would work on the trucks. I don’t want to sound like I’m knocking on the guys with the LT4 sc setups because indeed they saved a little money and it’s unique. I can certainly respect that they found a source for everything and did all the work themselves to make it work but it appears you won't be doing a sc for $1200 given what is necessary to make it work.
 

If an LT4 setup is the route you’re looking to go down, it can be done. Unfortunately it doesn't look to be like it’s a ‘bolt on the sc, tune and go’ sort of scenario, it looks like some parts were needed and the charger needed to be modified to fit but it’s been done according to this thread: https://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/238756-so-you-want-to-put-a-lt4-supercharger-on-your-l83l86/

 

I’m no expert and do not have a twin screw setup, so guys with these setups can drop in and give more a more detailed answer but I figured I’d chime in to show my findings. It looks like a cool swap. I’m curious to see what it runs on e85. 

Edited by prox_denali
Posted (edited)
39 minutes ago, prox_denali said:

I don’t think they’d be defective as much as it’s just a used supercharger. EBay has their surprises though! Yeah cost might be a lot less than a BNIB aftermarket supercharger. But when you buy aftermarket new it comes warrantied, everything you need is already there and you won’t have to piece a kit together. With an LT4 sc, once you get all the parts you need to do the swap, you’re in it for a small fraction less than if you went with a new, aftermarket kit. This is besides the fact but still something to consider.


Another thing to note is what aftermarket manufacturers do to enhance their designs from their competitors and O.E spec stuff (I.e how their designs dissipate heat/keeps temps down more, how much air they can move, how fast they spin, how much more power/tq they make etc.) as opposed to their competitors and stock designs. Whipple can also write the tune specific to your truck or give the option to tune it yourself and save a little money while the lt4 sc you’d have to find someone to tune your truck (or diy) and write a custom tune. I would highly doubt a stock lt4 map would work on the trucks. I don’t want to sound like I’m knocking on the guys with the LT4 sc setups because indeed they saved a little money and it’s unique. I can certainly respect that they found a source for everything and did all the work themselves to make it work but it appears you won't be doing a sc for $1200 given what is necessary to make it work.
 

If an LT4 setup is the route you’re looking to go down, it can be done. Unfortunately it doesn't look to be like it’s a ‘bolt on the sc, tune and go’ sort of scenario, it looks like some parts were needed and the charger needed to be modified to fit but it’s been done according to this thread: https://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/238756-so-you-want-to-put-a-lt4-supercharger-on-your-l83l86/

 

I’m no expert and do not have a twin screw setup, so guys with these setups can drop in and give more a more detailed answer but I figured I’d chime in to show my findings. It looks like a cool swap. I’m curious to see what it runs on e85. 

i understand the piecing together parts , not a problem, just wondering if there is a performance enhancement with Whipple vs LT4. I would be happy making 500hp dont need more than that.. is the LT4 SC capable of this?

 

 

update, LT4 conversion will run $5-6000.

Edited by flyingfool
Posted (edited)

Ohh my mistake. I mean given from the thread I linked above, I don't think it would be too far out of the realm to reach 500hp with the lt4 sc. He claims it made 483 but I didn't see anywhere in his thread about whether it was ported or not and what pulley he was running. Maybe on e85, ported and smaller pulley? Idk if you plan on running e85 or running lt4 hpfp/low side fp and injectors but I'd imagine your truck would want it. A cam paired with the supercharger should certainly get you there but I don't have the 5.3 either so I can only assume all of this. 

Edited by prox_denali
Posted (edited)

yeah I think one would be better off with a Whipple considering LT4 conversion is $6000.

 

E85 cost $2.50/gal in my town so not sure that's worth the upgrade. A set of Ported heads ,cam and exhaust is probably a better route

Edited by flyingfool

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This is a 1/2 ton thing ONLY.  All HDs 2020-2026 have the two speed transfer case, with Autotrac as an option.     1/2 tons 2019-2026, regular 4x4s come with a single speed case (no 4LO!), and trucks with Z71 ordered, or all Trail Boss trucks come with the 2 speed case.  2 speed case is also an option on WT, and is also standard on High Country.  
    • 2013 5.3 still to this day calls for the PF48 filter.  Which as a 15psi bypass pressure.     There is a TSB, 17-NA-157 that talks about the PF-63 and PF-64 filters which have a higher bypass rating of 22psi.    TSB HERE - temp.xml   "Beginning in 2012, the oil pumps began to regulate main gallery feedback instead of pump out pressure. This means that the oil pump now does not begin to regulate until pressure is built up to the main gallery. This change reduces the amount of time it takes to provide oil to the engine bearing and lifters during extreme cold start conditions.  Main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are present on the following engine families which use Spin-on oil filters: Small Gas Engine (SGE), Large Gas Engine (LGE), High Feature (HFV6) Gen2 and Small Block Gen5 gasoline engines. These engines with the main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are factory built with an ACDelco® oil filters"   It also calls out what engines use those filters.  The gen 4 small blocks were not on that list (LMG, LC9, L9H, L92, L94, L20, L96).  Gen 5 small blocks use the higher pressure filter.          That all said...   Your 7045 Napa filter is the PF63 equivalent, with 22psi bypass.  You are already using the higher bypass pressure filter.  You CAN keep using it, you don't technically have to use it though.  
    • Do you know WHY the filter relief setting was increased to 22 psig?    When the new system goes into the second stage the pump volume ramps up considerably. It was found that the 15 psi filter bypass setting put the filter in bypass on a warm engine when the second stage was activated. Raising the filter bypass setting forced the filter to do what it designed to do. Filter. Preventing debris from circulating during high load, high rpm operation.    So next question is how did GM find this out? VLOM/lifter failures and a deep dive by Melling Corp.    Last question. Is it required? Look at it like this; a motor may be equipped with a rev limiter. But it only works if the set point in reached. That 22 psig setting only matters if the pressure differential across the filter media exceeds 15 psig during normal warm operation. Second stage kicks in around 3000-3500 rpm.    I can't answer your question because I don't know you and how you use the truck. But I think there is enough information here to let you decide for yourself. 😉
    • Probably not their first rodeo, so it should go as planned most likely.  Typically the service manager or tech doing the swap will put some seat time to shake it down after they get it all put back together.  We usually put 50-100mi before we hand them back so if something happens, its not after you get it.  A coolant leaks, oil leaks, a ground left off or loose, vibration, etc.     The new engines so far have been good?  There's been a couple that have popped out there again (the replacement engine) but most have been okay.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...