Jump to content

DEF usage on 2020 HD models

Wbrisett
 Share

Recommended Posts

Wbrisett Enthusiast

Wbrisett

Posted
Posted

I just returned from a 2,000 mile trip. During this trip I put in 5 gallons of DEF (and my GMC is telling me it's ½ full now and I have 1000 miles of DEF range left)... Really??? My 2015 Chevy 2500 HD didn't nearly drink this much DEF. I know emission standards have tightened up a bit, but this seems a bit extreme. Is 7 ½ gallons for 2,000 miles normal? (I'm guessing another 2 ½ gallons based on how much I had to put in last time). The only silver lining is I have a fleet account and can use the trucking lanes for filling up, which have DEF at the pump, but this usage seems way too high. What are others seeing with 2020 models?

Thankful Enthusiast

Thankful

Posted
Posted

I think 7 and 1/2 gallons is too much for a 2,000 mile trip.  I traveled to New York last month, almost 2,000 miles there and back, and only used about 4 gallons.  What really blows my mind is how a mixture of urine and water costs more than diesel fuel.

redwngr Senior Enthusiast

redwngr

Posted
Posted

The DEF gauge is NOT a simple variable gauge like a fuel gauge.

It also blends in an estimate of the remaining range (like the range estimate for fuel in the dic).

 

The only way to know miles per def gallon is to fill it, drive it for a few thousand and refill it.  Just like a hand-calc for fuel mileage. 

 

https://gm-techlink.com/?p=13143

 

Diesel Exhaust Fluid Consumption

May 21, 2020

The diesel engines (RPOs LWN, LM2, L5P, L5D) available on 2020 Colorado, Express, Silverado 1500, Silverado 2500HD/3500HD, Silverado 4500HD/5500HD/6500HD, Canyon, Savana, Sierra 1500, and Sierra 2500HD/3500HD models use Diesel Exhaust Fluid (DEF) (Fig. 1) in order to reduce the exhaust Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) levels within the Selective Catalyst Reduction stage of the exhaust aftertreatment system. A series of driver prompts and warnings are initiated when the DEF level falls below a calibrated value.

 

F01-DEF-1.pngFig. 1

 

Segmented DEF Level Gauge

The current 2020 Silverado 1500 and Sierra 1500 models have a DEF level gauge on the instrument cluster that provides drivers with a representation of how much DEF is in the DEF tank up. (Fig. 2) The DEF level gauge does not operate like a typical float-style gauge that is used in a fuel tank. The Engine Control Module (ECM) monitors the DEF level and consumption rate in order to calculate an estimated range. DEF levels are detected by the DEF level sensor.

 

F02-DEF-2.pngFig. 2

 

There may be some fluctuation in the amount of DEF represented on the DEF level gauge. After filling the DEF tank, it may take a few key cycles to register the correct amount in the DEF tank. With the new segmented DEF level gauge, it is possible that after adding 5 gallons (18.9 L) of DEF that the gauge reads as a full tank after the fill event. However, if the actual level of DEF is just entering the last segment on the gauge, the gauge is likely to drop by one segment shortly after driving after the fill event. As a result, a driver could have an initial impression that the vehicle consumes an excessive amount of DEF.

Emissions Requirements

Every year, GM produces diesel engines that continue to meet aggressive federal requirements to reduce Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) in the vehicle exhaust. As DEF is required to reduce the NOx in the exhaust, DEF consumption will increase as NOx reduction requirements increase. Customer trading in an older model year diesel vehicle for a newer model year vehicle will likely see an increase in DEF usage. DEF consumption increases as the newer vehicles meet the more stringent emission requirements for that model year.
The amount of DEF consumed also is a function of how hard the engine is working, or engine load. Due to engine use, it is more representative to compare DEF consumption to the amount of fuel consumed – also a function of engine load – instead of miles traveled. In addition to engine load, other factors that affect the DEF usage rate are the humidity, temperature, and altitude where the vehicle is operating.

Under certain conditions, the ECM will increase or decrease the amount of DEF used based on learning or adaptive algorithms. In the event of a malfunction and Check Engine light, the ECM may double or even eliminate the amount of DEF that is being used. An improper amount of DEF use will continue until the vehicle is repaired and the learned value in the ECM is reset.

 

 

  • Like 1
shadow gray 2020 hd Enthusiast

shadow gray 2020 hd

Posted
Posted

From the way I read the above, there is not a typical tank float level sensor that might get stuck?  I have not added any def to my tank in over 500 miles.  The display when I added went to one bar less than full, but I know it was full at that time.  A day or so later with maybe 100 miles of driving, the display showed full and is still showing full now.  Is this normal? 

Londart2020 Enthusiast

Londart2020

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, shadow gray 2020 hd said:

From the way I read the above, there is not a typical tank float level sensor that might get stuck?  I have not added any def to my tank in over 500 miles.  The display when I added went to one bar less than full, but I know it was full at that time.  A day or so later with maybe 100 miles of driving, the display showed full and is still showing full now.  Is this normal? 

I just asked this same question as I am experiencing the same thing...down a square, now full again, even after towing my TR 200+ miles...??

Wbrisett Enthusiast

Wbrisett

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I too see even full that the DEF gauge shows one bar down. I might have a chat with my local dealer and see what they think. Just seems to me that 7+ gallons for 2,000-ish miles (closer to 2400) is too much.  I do wonder if they need to reset something after reading that bulletin. 

cNate Enthusiast

cNate

Posted
Posted

There’s a service bulletin for this. I had the same issues and haven’t had them since. My sensor reads accurately now. I am burning a lot of DEF fluid compared to previous generation trucks but it’s definitely improved after the service bulletin: sensor is spot on now and mileage has increased.

 

I was getting 300-400 miles per gallon on DEF the first 11k miles and now I’m seeing closer to 700-800 miles per gallon over the last 4K miles after service. Same driving conditions.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
mdbourque New Member

mdbourque

Posted
Posted

I have the 2020 Silverado 2500 HD and just got back from a 3700 mile trip towing a ~7000lb travel trailer.  I had to fill my 4.5 gallon DEF tank three times!  It eats DEF like crazy. Mine starts giving me warnings that my DEF range is 975 miles about 150-200 miles after I fill it. Also, about 20 miles from home the DEF gauge went from 3/8 to 0 in one step and told me "DEF low, speed limited soon".   The DEF sensor is seriously goofed up and the 2020 is using a *lot* of DEF.  They did the DEF related software update when I got back but I have not been towing to see if it still uses an exorbitant amount of DEF.

  • Like 1
Wbrisett Enthusiast

Wbrisett

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Got an appointment for them to look into it today. I'll post how that goes. 

  • Like 1
Wbrisett Enthusiast

Wbrisett

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 10/2/2020 at 10:03 AM, cNate said:

There’s a service bulletin for this.

 

Any idea what that bulletin is? My dealer says he can't find anything and service tech looking at the truck can't find anything, so he's saying 7 ½ gallons for a 2200 trip is about right. ? ... I find that hard to believe. Unless you're now carrying boxes of the stuff around all the time or can find stations with DEF at the pump, they are really handicapping folks. I think I'm using way too much.

cNate Enthusiast

cNate

Posted
Posted
 
Any idea what that bulletin is? My dealer says he can't find anything and service tech looking at the truck can't find anything, so he's saying 7 ½ gallons for a 2200 trip is about right. [emoji44] ... I find that hard to believe. Unless you're now carrying boxes of the stuff around all the time or can find stations with DEF at the pump, they are really handicapping folks. I think I'm using way too much.

049e8de0415dc9ba6900ea37d197f1e9.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
cNate Enthusiast

cNate

Posted
Posted

My dealership had no idea either. I asked them to search for it based on a post I read on another forum and they found. See number in photo I posted.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • nfisherman
      Software Update

      By nfisherman · Posted

      Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...