Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Trading my 8spd for a 10spd this week.

But, since the transmission fluid was changed and some kind of TSB done for the cold hesitation, I have to say its been a lot better. 

Posted
24 minutes ago, TeamSaris said:

Trading my 8spd for a 10spd this week.

But, since the transmission fluid was changed and some kind of TSB done for the cold hesitation, I have to say its been a lot better. 

What is "the cold hesitation"?

Posted
5 hours ago, UGADawgs said:

My 2019 5.3/8-speed has been acting up lately. It seems like it is hunting gears when it shouldn't be shifting. Going to take it in this week and see if they'll change the ATF under the TSB.

 

https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/tsbs/2020/MC-10174268-9999.pdf

Don't be surprised if they refuse to perform a TSB for transmission shudder on a vehicle that is not experiencing shudder. You may have an issue that is repairable under warranty but if it's not shudder this TSB doesn't apply.

 

My previous truck was a 2018 Colorado with the 8 speed and some Colorado owners tried getting non-shudder issues addressed by the 18-NA-355 TSB, https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/tsbs/2019/MC-10163890-9999.pdf , (same issue, earlier TSB) and almost always were denied. Some would complain of harsh shifting and the dealer would say No to the TSB. Many who had shudder reported shift improvement in addition to shudder elimination after the TSB. The July 08, 2019 update of the TSB removed the requirement for PicoScope testing or other diagnosis beyond owner complaint of Shudder BUT it had to be a complaint of shudder (not gear hunting).

 

Good luck. Let us know what they say.

 

JMHO

No expertise implied or expressed

 

 

Posted
9 hours ago, RWTJR said:

Don't be surprised if they refuse to perform a TSB for transmission shudder on a vehicle that is not experiencing shudder. You may have an issue that is repairable under warranty but if it's not shudder this TSB doesn't apply.

 

My previous truck was a 2018 Colorado with the 8 speed and some Colorado owners tried getting non-shudder issues addressed by the 18-NA-355 TSB, https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/tsbs/2019/MC-10163890-9999.pdf , (same issue, earlier TSB) and almost always were denied. Some would complain of harsh shifting and the dealer would say No to the TSB. Many who had shudder reported shift improvement in addition to shudder elimination after the TSB. The July 08, 2019 update of the TSB removed the requirement for PicoScope testing or other diagnosis beyond owner complaint of Shudder BUT it had to be a complaint of shudder (not gear hunting).

 

Good luck. Let us know what they say.

 

JMHO

No expertise implied or expressed

 

 


I mentioned the gear hunting because the truck was shaking and the RPMs were fluttering slightly at constant speed. I will describe it as shudder per the TSB when dropping it off and have it printed to hand to the service writer. I'll let you guys know either way.

 

Posted
11 hours ago, Jac365 said:

What is "the cold hesitation"?

When the truck is cold it feels like the trans finds neutral between first and second. The whole truck "lurches". Sometimes bad, sometimes not bad. It has gotten a lot better since the last update and transmission fluid change, the truck runs great too. I just didnt want any issues down the road. I was adamant my new truck had the 5.3 10spd. 

Posted

Dropped it off today and told them about the hard shift between 1 & 2 when cold and the random shutter during acceleration and they changed the fluid per the TSB without asking questions.

 

image.png.2bdd6fc802348d628a53d53982a3104f.png

Posted
40 minutes ago, UGADawgs said:

Dropped it off today and told them about the hard shift between 1 & 2 when cold and the random shutter during acceleration and they changed the fluid per the TSB without asking questions.

 

image.png.2bdd6fc802348d628a53d53982a3104f.png

Let us know if it improves the cold 1-2 hard shift.  

  • Like 1
Posted

My new company truck is a 8spd 5.3 4x4, my previous company truck was a 2013 f150 5.0 4x4! Last week I was towing a trailer about 6k lbs, I've towed the same load many times with the ford, 65-70mph country roads with smalls hills! Going down a grade or coming to a stop the ford had aggressive engine breaking and the Silverado doesn't seem to want to downshift to allow engine breaking! Both in tow haul mode, I would set cruise on the Silverado and it would exceed the cruise set point by 10mph going down hill and the f150 would not go any higher then 3mph over the set point! 

 

Besides that I have really enjoyed driving the Silverado, I'm ready to upgrade my personal vehicle! I have always had Toyota's but thinking about jumping ship this time around! 

Posted
On 12/28/2020 at 3:33 PM, BlancoSilverado said:

Check out the Sierra, you can get the 10 speed in the SLE (1 up from base, assuming crew cab, 4wd, short bed). 50k msrp, probably 42k out the door. 

Thanks didn't know that, and theirs a few for 41k locally, sounds like a better option over getting the Texas edition. 

Posted
On 12/30/2020 at 5:59 PM, SilveradoRST said:

Let us know if it improves the cold 1-2 hard shift.  

Negative, no affect, still have it.

Posted
2 hours ago, UGADawgs said:

Negative, no affect, still have it.

I have a buddy that has a 2017 5.3L with 8 spd and he says he has cold hard shifts but if he remote starts it and let’s it sit for 5 mins to warm up the truck doesn’t hesitate or have the hard shifts.   Anyone else verify this??  
 

Posted
22 minutes ago, TNTSilverado said:

I have a buddy that has a 2017 5.3L with 8 spd and he says he has cold hard shifts but if he remote starts it and let’s it sit for 5 mins to warm up the truck doesn’t hesitate or have the hard shifts.   Anyone else verify this??  
 

yeah, if I wait for it to warm up, it won't do the cold 1-2 shift lunge. 

Posted
12 minutes ago, UGADawgs said:

yeah, if I wait for it to warm up, it won't do the cold 1-2 shift lunge. 

To describe it, it is like the truck goes to speed up and is then slightly being pulled back by tug rope and then it releases and it lunges and drives normally. 

Posted

Owe I know. I had a 2018 8 spd with 6.2L. Absolutely loved the truck but couldn’t stand the clunking. My truck did this all the time. If I had known I could have let it warm up a bit and it wouldn’t happen. Might have kept me from trading it in, but then again, after driving the 10 spd it was a done deal. 
Seems to me like a simple fix??  Start it and let it run a few minutes. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...