Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

The titan tank in my 2009 was best mod beside Efi live . Stock 26 gal tanked sucked while towing . The 36 gal is a lot better and unless I was pulling more often won’t change.

Edited by BB&Chiveon
Posted

Also On the Titan discloser it indicates the DIC will be inaccurate. I wonder if GM has come up with a reprogram  solution like ford did

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Covid cabin fever got me, or I just got bored.  Ordered the tank from Amazon, I’ll post some pictures when it arrives and I’ll try to install myself in the driveway.

  • Like 1
Posted

I've been thinking about it too. Anxious to hear what your thoughts are and if the gauges read correctly. Good luck!

 

Posted

Gage might read funny, but I'm sure you can get a real good estimate of fuel in the tank, or just multiply the gallons buy MPG and theres your range.

Posted

Range is just a guess on how you might drive in the future...

 

Several ways to estimate range, just as accurately as the estimate from the computer 

 

Just like we did before there were 'guess-o-meters' for range. 

 

 

We might even do it better, if we know that we are going to getting better/worse fuel economy due change in the grades/speeds/loads/etc.

 

 

 

Posted

I don't think you will have to worry about range of fuel with that tank, the limiting factor will be the range of your bladder. I wish they made one for the cclb as I do think 36 gallons is a bit light for a dually.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk

Posted

I received the replacement tank earlier this week.  The box Titan ships the tank in is about 15 inches too long.  Box was beat up pretty bad, gouges in the cardboard where the tank straps poked through and ripped the cardboard as the tank and straps slid back and forth inside the box.  The tank is plastic and was in surprisingly good condition.

 

I tried to do the replacement in the driveway, but I do not have the tools to disconnect the “quick connect” fuel line fittings.  I got the old tank down, but was unable to disconnect the supply and return lines.  Clearances under the truck would have made it hard to get the new tank in place under the truck, it hangs down about two inched lower, and the top sticks up higher.  Going to a diesel repair shop next week to have the tank installed, I will let you know how it goes.

 

The tank uses the original fuel pickup and level sender, so I expect the fuel level gauge to work as the original, just take longer to fall off the FULL mark.  I have an iDash to backup that reading.  I do expect the ‘Range’ calculation to be off in the low direction.  After all, this tank is roughly 55% larger than the original equipment, so I expect the actual ‘Range’ to be half again further than reported.  I think that is a good thing!

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I was finally able to get the truck out for a road trip with the new Titan tank. After a fill-up I put 400 miles on the truck.  Usually takes 60-90 miles on the highway for the fuel gauge to come off the full mark.  The new tank went to 175 miles before falling below full, 40 of those miles were in town.  After the 400 mile trip the fuel gauge was at 11/16 of a tank.

 

The truck did a software update today, but I had to unplug the iDash from the OBD port before it would install successfully.  This is the first software update I have noticed the truck doing since I brought it home last February.  It has been to the dealership for a free oil change and tire rotation once.  They may have done an update then.

 

Photos show old and new tank installed from the driver's side, and a couple of the tank just after it came out of the box.

IMG_4134.JPG

IMG_4136.JPG

IMG_4138.JPG

IMG_4146.JPG

Posted

Only driven a couple of half tanks full so far, no problems.  I'm sure the miles to empty is off, it has not changed since going to the bigger tank.  A full tank shows about 700 miles to empty.  In 15K miles I have been averaging 18.9 MPG.  With a 36 gallon tank that's 680.4 miles.  With the larger tank it should be 1,058.4 miles.  The trucks computer is not aware of the extra fuel in the tank.  If you add about 50% to the trucks estimate, you will be closer to the truth.

  • 1 month later...
Posted
On 2/11/2021 at 3:37 PM, Major Tom said:

Only driven a couple of half tanks full so far, no problems.  I'm sure the miles to empty is off, it has not changed since going to the bigger tank.  A full tank shows about 700 miles to empty.  In 15K miles I have been averaging 18.9 MPG.  With a 36 gallon tank that's 680.4 miles.  With the larger tank it should be 1,058.4 miles.  The trucks computer is not aware of the extra fuel in the tank.  If you add about 50% to the trucks estimate, you will be closer to the truth.

 

Now that you have had it a bit of time - how do you like it?   the good (size), the bad (if any) and the ugly (if any). 

 

Thx 

Posted

The good is the extra 55% on-board.  With the cost of fuel going up, and the limits on credit card purchase at the local pump, that could be the ugly.  The bad for off road is, the lack of a tank skid plate and a metal shield between the driveline and the tank that the original equipment has.

 

All that being said, I’ll keep the Titan tank.  Can anyone use an original tank and straps?  Make me an offer.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 3,061 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...