Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

sky net is already up and running under Elon's SPaceX , they launched over a 1000 mini sats last year. I rememeber watching them being launched out over the west coast. It was facinating seeing a string of sats in a "train line" across the night sky. it must have be over 2000 miles long .

 

Anyways he's selling it as free or lowcost interenet service for impoverished countries.  but they are capable of 24/7 image recording which he can be sold to local state , cities Countries for policing and basic survailance of the people.

Posted
29 minutes ago, diyer2 said:

There are so many things a robot can't do and it will be years before they can. 

like what???

Posted
no reason for human troops to be fresh anymore, you seem to think your needed,. the only human left on the battle field will be mechanics and he's on shaky ground too
Its not about being needed. It's about wanting to do it and being there.

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

Posted
like what???

If you dont know then you believe the end of the human species is near because robots can do everything and better.

 

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

  • Confused 1
Posted

You know what happens when there’s not enough work to sustain a population? It shrinks. The environmental people would be extremely happy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
3 hours ago, flyingfool said:

no reason for human troops to be fresh anymore, you seem to think your needed,. the only human left on the battle field will be mechanics and he's on shaky ground too

A troop being "fresh" is a Cold War concept which is more effective today with all the technology.  This is not an even or, technology will keep a troop fresh whether military command structure knows it or not.  Troop numbers have downsized a bit because of technology, but won't be replaced because of technology.  Hollywood is the only place technology doesn't need a troop on the battlefield.  In the real world, human intelligence can't be replaced.  Although, it would be nice to have an android like "Data" (Star Trek Next Gen) working next to me.

Posted
3 hours ago, flyingfool said:

sky net is already up and running under Elon's SPaceX , they launched over a 1000 mini sats last year. I rememeber watching them being launched out over the west coast.

In the last 30 yrs, launches from the Western Range have never been more than 36 per year, 20 of which had nothing to do with satellites.  Your information source is grossly inaccurate.  During my glory days, I was a member of a rocket launch Disaster Control Group.  

Posted
1 hour ago, The Zip said:

In the last 30 yrs, launches from the Western Range have never been more than 36 per year, 20 of which had nothing to do with satellites.  Your information source is grossly inaccurate.  During my glory days, I was a member of a rocket launch Disaster Control Group.  

This might be what he was referring to:

https://www.kmov.com/news/see-a-string-of-lights-in-the-sky-it-was-probably-spacex-s-starlink-satellites/article_ca175fb8-88ff-11ea-acb9-63a781c28857.html

 

The 60 Starlink broadband satellites rode atop one of SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rockets, taking off from Florida’s Kennedy Space Center at 3:30 pm ET. The devices are now coasting through orbit, where they will soon begin climbing to about 340 miles above ground, their operational altitude. This launch brings the total number of Starlink satellites in orbit to more than 400.

 

SpaceX has said the satellites will allow it to beam Internet directly to terminals that consumers will set up at their homes or offices. Service is expected to roll out in the United States and Canada this year, CEO Elon Musk has said. The company plans to eventually grow its constellation to more than 40,000 satellites, blanketing the entire planet in cheap, high-speed Internet connectivity.

Posted
1 hour ago, The Zip said:

In the last 30 yrs, launches from the Western Range have never been more than 36 per year, 20 of which had nothing to do with satellites.  Your information source is grossly inaccurate.  During my glory days, I was a member of a rocket launch Disaster Control Group.  

what's inaccurate ?

Posted
26 minutes ago, aseibel said:

This might be what he was referring to:

https://www.kmov.com/news/see-a-string-of-lights-in-the-sky-it-was-probably-spacex-s-starlink-satellites/article_ca175fb8-88ff-11ea-acb9-63a781c28857.html

 

The 60 Starlink broadband satellites rode atop one of SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rockets, taking off from Florida’s Kennedy Space Center at 3:30 pm ET. The devices are now coasting through orbit, where they will soon begin climbing to about 340 miles above ground, their operational altitude. This launch brings the total number of Starlink satellites in orbit to more than 400.

 

SpaceX has said the satellites will allow it to beam Internet directly to terminals that consumers will set up at their homes or offices. Service is expected to roll out in the United States and Canada this year, CEO Elon Musk has said. The company plans to eventually grow its constellation to more than 40,000 satellites, blanketing the entire planet in cheap, high-speed Internet connectivity.

Kennedy Space Center (KSC) is the Eastern Range launching into a different orbit than the Western Range.  He said he remember watching these launches from the West Coast.  There is no way he could see these KSC launches from LA?

Posted
15 minutes ago, The Zip said:

Kennedy Space Center (KSC) is the Eastern Range launching into a different orbit than the Western Range.  He said he remember watching these launches from the West Coast.  There is no way he could see these KSC launches from LA?

I'm no rocket scientist, I don't even know which way they go once they are airborne, but I do know people in Wisconsin who could see the string of lights from a recent launch. We're pretty far from America's wang up here. Just saying they could be seen from a ways off- not the launch itself, but when they went overhead.

 

Here's the story from a local news station. https://waow.com/2020/04/27/spot-a-line-of-lights-in-the-night-sky-its-most-likely-spacex-starlink-satellites/

 

Posted
28 minutes ago, flyingfool said:

what's inaccurate ?

As a member of a Launch Disaster Control Group (LDCG), you are on the ground in close proximity to a rocket launch.  I have been a member of the LDCG for over 300 rocket and missile launches.  In the best year of the Western Range, there was no more than 3 launches per month.  You watching 1000 launches from the Western range is inaccurate.  That's an average of 83 per month, not possible.

  • Like 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, The Zip said:

As a member of a Launch Disaster Control Group (LDCG), you are on the ground in close proximity to a rocket launch.  I have been a member of the LDCG for over 300 rocket and missile launches.  In the best year of the Western Range, there was no more than 3 launches per month.  You watching 1000 launches from the Western range is inaccurate.  That's an average of 83 per month, not possible.

Did you read the article I shared? It said 60 mini satellites were launched on 1 Falcon 9 rocket. So not 1000 launches, but 1000 satellites in total. 

Posted
1 hour ago, aseibel said:

Did you read the article I shared? It said 60 mini satellites were launched on 1 Falcon 9 rocket. So not 1000 launches, but 1000 satellites in total. 

I read what you wrote, but don't click on untrusted links.  Subject got off track for a minute, I have no more comments about rocket launches.

Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, The Zip said:

Kennedy Space Center (KSC) is the Eastern Range launching into a different orbit than the Western Range.  He said he remember watching these launches from the West Coast.  There is no way he could see these KSC launches from LA?

i'm telling you what i saw,  on the west coast Los Angeles San Pedro area. I stood there for "20 minutes"  1 hour after sunset. watching a conga line of sats cruising by West to East..at least 1000 units.  no way will 60 mini sats traverse the sky for this long of a duration. while flying by at a steady speed of a normal satalite in orbit, they where all perfectly spaced probably 50 mile separation.  some one has an interesting project up there if its not  SpaceX stuff.

on a side note, i had a super bright led focusing flashlight and set it to pulse mode. and managed to train it on a few of them. interesting enough one sat pulled off the conga line stopped and gave a relfective flash back at me, then continued back in the group

Edited by flyingfool

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • A little girl said her prayers every night before bed and she asked G d to watch after each person she loved. One night she forgot to pray for her babysitter and her babysitter died. A few days later she forgot to pray for someone else and they died. The next night she forgot to pray for her dad. The next morning her dad was terrified. A bus almost crashed into him. He almost fell off a fifty foot ladder and almost wrecked on the way home. When he arrived home, he said I had a terrible day. His wife replied, “You think you had a bad day? My aerobics teacher died during class.
    • Nice! I had one here, once. The car dealer I used to haul for stopped by with it. That was over 10 years ago now. Those are SUPER rare these days, especially up here! Never even see them at car shows anymore.   https://postimg.cc/0rvcNZ1W
    • I remember watching one of the auctions on TV. It just happened that they had two little red express trucks. My brother bought one new in 1979, still has it. So I hung on to watch them cross. The retro redone example brought more bids and went for more money than the original one did. My brother has redone his 3 times and raced it. He’s now in the process of making more tame for cruising. 
    • I always upgraded the suspension and steering components - bushings and ball joints, and had older cars that I could out-corner ANY modern car with. I used to be able to take my '78 Cutlass on off-ramps at stupid speeds and make the sharp MA corners without even squealing the tires. So much fun. My '72 El Camino must've had work done by the previous owner, since that thing seemed to handle even better than the '78.   I think the suspension & steering on the '72 was much more advanced than the '64, so that probably just made a good system even better.   I'm the same way with vehicles. I hate having to worry about the paint on my '93 W250 Cummins. I'm not used to that, lol.   https://postimg.cc/mzKr55sY
    • BEAUTIFUL!! That a Cutlass F85? Or 442? My side-ID skills are lacking thanks to failing memory, lol. Love that color & year, too!   Yeah I was never big on entering my own stuff, but I always liked seeing what everyone had, the rare models, and what's been modified. That was always fun. These days I have barely enough time to do what needs to be done at home.    Oddly enough, here in MA there are more car shows than ever in history! You'd think up here it would be dead, but it's bigger than EVER!          Took the 940 for its maiden voyage with the carburetor. At first I couldn't get out of the yard! This originally had the "Bosch" system (our other 940 has Regina - single fuel pump in fuel tank, and space-age-looking ignition coil on driver's fender) - that has dual fuel pumps. One in the tank, and one under the center left of the vehicle. I had unplugged the external one thinking I wouldn't need it with the carburetor ... but the way I have the pressure regulator hooked up, 90% of the fuel volume is going back to the fuel tank, so cranked all the way down, the regulator is only supplying a hair above 3.5 PSI to the carb. Turns out the in-tank pump (15 PSI alone, instead of 45) couldn't handle the load. Plugged it back in and went for a rip. Ran great!   Throttle response is always amazing with carburetors. ZERO delay that no FI system can reproduce. Also fires up in half the crank rotations as before. Low end power was DRAMATICALLY improved. There was an ongoing lean issue with the FI that I got tired of figuring out, so this is a MASSIVE improvement! Above 50 MPH on hills it feels SUPER weak, though. This is more than likely due to the timing not being advanced enough by the computer, since it believes there are multiple failures. I can live with that through the winter. Will keep me from passing slowpokes where I shouldn't and getting speeding tickets at least. 😁
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...