Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So I’ve had my 2018 Redline (5.3) with a K&N CAI for about a year now and have been pretty satisfied with it. I liked that it sounded pretty much stock until I got into the 2k-3k RPM range and then the CAI opened up a little bit of audible grunt, which was nice.

 

But now I’m contemplating picking up a full exhaust system. I’ve done a fair bit a sifting through threads here and I ideally would like just little extra growl when I get on the throttle and preferably minimal to no drone at all since it’s my daily driver. The CAI is great, but as I mentioned, you can only hear it around 2k/3k and nothing lower or higher than that.

 

I know Borla and Corsa are some of the top recommendations here, but unfortunately I would really like to be my budget for this sub $700 if possible.

 

I’ve narrowed it down to these choices. I’m self-admittedly somewhat of an exhaust novice, so any input or experience with these options would be great, thanks!

 

https://www.americantrucks.com/flowmaster-silverado1500-flowfx-single-exhaust-system-black-tip-side-exit-717857.html

 

https://www.americantrucks.com/flowmaster-silverado1500-flowfx-dual-exhaust-system-black-tips-side-exit-717869.html

 

https://www.americantrucks.com/mbrp-3-black-series-catback-exhaust-single-side-exit-1417-53l.html

 

https://www.americantrucks.com/carven-exhaust-competitor-series-catback-exhaust-single-side-exit-1418-53l-silverado.html

 

https://www.americantrucks.com/carven-exhaust-progressive-series-catback-exhaust-single-side-exit-1418-53l-silverad.html

Posted (edited)

Why not just have the stock muffler remove and have what ever muffler you want welded in it's place it?  It will be alot cheaper and still sound the same and have the same performance.  You already have 3" pipes which is what most of the options you listed have.

 

I personally wouldn't go with anything Flowmaster.  They sound good but are a chambered design and block flow.  I would go with more of a straight through design.

Edited by JONBLARC7
  • Like 1
Posted
10 hours ago, mistermcgoo said:

 

I know Borla and Corsa are some of the top recommendations here, but unfortunately I would really like to be my budget for this sub $700 if possible.

 

I’ve narrowed it down to these choices. I’m self-admittedly somewhat of an exhaust novice, so any input or experience with these options would be great, thanks!

I have the MBRP exhaust you mentioned, except it is 3.5” on a 6.2. It is very loud, cold start shakes the pictures in my house. I like it, but my neighbours hate me.  
 

All of them will drone in V4 mode because they delete the flapper valve. 
 

Do some YouTube research on the different sounds. That’s probably the easiest way to find out what you like

  • Like 1
Posted
7 hours ago, JONBLARC7 said:

Why not just have the stock muffler remove and have what ever muffler you want welded in it's place it?  It will be alot cheaper and still sound the same and have the same performance.  You already have 3" pipes which is what most of the options you listed have.

 

I personally wouldn't go with anything Flowmaster.  They sound good but are a chambered design and block flow.  I would go with more of a straight through design.

Hmm that could be an option as well. Do you have an recommendations over Flowmaster for a muffler?

Posted
25 minutes ago, SeekAndDestroy said:

I have the MBRP exhaust you mentioned, except it is 3.5” on a 6.2. It is very loud, cold start shakes the pictures in my house. I like it, but my neighbours hate me.  
 

All of them will drone in V4 mode because they delete the flapper valve. 
 

Do some YouTube research on the different sounds. That’s probably the easiest way to find out what you like

Thanks for the reply. I looked into the MBRP a bit more, but it specfically said on their website that the Black Series is not recommended for use in environments that could have road salt. Guess since I’m in PA that rules out that option..

 

I found a few clips of Carven’s systems and they sound pretty nice, especially for the price. They seem like a relatively new company. Not sure if that’s a good thing or bad thing..

Posted

If you keep the rear resonator, you can pretty much put whichever muffler on it and only gain a little bit of sound. My borla xr1, was barely noticeable with the resonator it place. Once I removed that it was way louder.

 

Just find you a single in/out 3" muffler and and go to a muffler shop and have it welded in.

  • Like 2
Posted

I agree WIth YukonXL04 

 

I have a Magnaflow 12909 which is a 3-1/2 off set in and 3-1/2 center out.  Which is bigger piping than you need for your 5.3.  But I wouldn't recommend it because with stock manifolds and cats it is no louder than the stock muffler just slightly deeper.  Once you put headers with no cats it gets much louder. 

 

But

I'm switching it out to the XR1 like YukonXL04 to get alittle more volume at idle so you can here my cam better.

 

Google 3" muffler center/offset to help the muffler shop fit it easier (but not necessary).  Then go you youtube and search the muffler you like for a sound clip.

  • Like 1
Posted

This guy if you scroll through his video's to about 4 years ago.  He has a bunch of different  muffler comparision videos.  Here is what a XR1 will sound like on your truck.  With the stock stuff.

 

 

 

Posted

I had the Carven R muffler and it droned bad, I had it on for almost 2 years so I got used to the drone but then I got a smoking deal on a Corsa catback and I dont think I can buy another exhaust that isnt Corsa.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

Have you considered the GM Performance Exhaust?  It's made by Borla and has the flapper built into it to help with the v4 drone.  I recently got this for my 2017 and really like it, sounds nice but not obnoxiously loud. Highly recommend it.  It uses the Borla Touring muffler which you can check out videos for on YouTube or Borla's website to get a sense of sound and loudness. 

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I have a carven cat back and it sounds amazing. Minimal drone and I get compliments on it all the time. It's also in your price range.

Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,074 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...