Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

How much can I lift my 2020 sierra 4x4 crew cab diesel without voiding my warranty? Also would an aftermarket grill guard affect warranty ? And has anyone found a manufacturer who makes camper shells for my 6ft 9inch bed with multi pro tailgate? Im worried my work tools will be stolen.

Posted

Anything you do aftermarket to your suspension, that is not a GM part, will void the warranty if they can attribute the part to the failure.  No, a grill will not void your warranty.  As for camper shells, no clue.  Not sure what kind of work tools you keep in your truck, or how big they are.  

  • Like 3
Posted
2 hours ago, Danny R. Sucher said:

How much can I lift my 2020 sierra 4x4 crew cab diesel without voiding my warranty? Also would an aftermarket grill guard affect warranty ? And has anyone found a manufacturer who makes camper shells for my 6ft 9inch bed with multi pro tailgate? Im worried my work tools will be stolen.

 

No lift technically.  You can install a lift if you want however keep in mind, if the lift can be proven that is caused something to fail that is factory to the truck, you may be denied warranty.  So if the diff fails, trans fails, steering gearbox fails under bumper to bumper, the lift can block you from warranty repair.  

 

All the major cap companies make caps for these trucks so you should have no issue there.  

 

Grille guards would only affect warranty on something like a front parking sensor as they have to be re-located to the bumper bar to function properly.  So if you had factory park sensors up front and a sensor failed but it was a wiring harness issue, you might get shot down because of the bumper guard.  

 

1 hour ago, Gangly said:

I would say no more than 2", as that is the factory lift height for GMC AT4's.

 

OP has an HD but posted in the 1/2 ton section.  AT4 HD doesn't get the 2 inch lift like the 1/2 ton.  

Posted

If you don't use the GM lift and have the GM dealer install it, almost all GM dealers today (unless your father or brother-in-law owns the dealership) would unfortunately use that as an excuse to say you have NO WARRANTY anymore.  

Posted
11 hours ago, Gangly said:

I would say no more than 2", as that is the factory lift height for GMC AT4's.

So 1.9" is safe? The correct answer is 0" as noted by others in this thread unless the GM level is installed by GM. 

 

Tyler

Posted

Thanks guys I really appreciate the feedback. As for caps I built an A.R.E. on their site and my local distributer sent me back a quote just shy of $5000. Installation not included. Leer has not even e-mailed me back, so I thought they didnt make one to fit the new 2020 beds yet. Rumer is A.R.E. is the only one. Oh tried snugtop also , and received no bid.?? I work construction in northern cali. And like to carry , not only tools, but also expensive fishing equipment. (you never know when you might happen upon great fishing) Anyway a shell is the only way for my lifestyle. keep me posted.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,122 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...