Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi All, 

 

I've got a 2017 GMC 1500 Denali, 5.3L, that's got a 2" RC level kit  with 285/55r20 on stock chrome 20" Denali wheels.  Looking to upgrade & put a true lift on it.  But I'm torn on which way to go.  Here are the three options I'm considering...

 

  1. 4" Fabtech Uniball Magride and 305/55r20s - At first I thought for sure this would be the way I'd like to go.  Nice mild lift with 33" tires that shouldn't really have much of any performance issues for the truck.  This 4" lift is one of if not the only Magride compatible lift at this level. The problem is that the 305/55r20's are actually only about 3/4" taller than my current set up.  Fabtech's website states that this lift would fit up to a 295/55r20 tire which kind of surprises me & is maybe 1/2" more tire than my current 285's.   Some pics I've found show some trucks looking just like I'd like, some even running 35's, but others looking like there's almost no change to the truck's stance. 
  2.  6" Fabtech Gen 2 Magride & 35x12.50r20s - Saw a truck this weekend with a sim set up & it looks just about right to what I'd like my truck to look like.  This Fabtech lift also doesn't offset the front like many other lifts which may be a plus.  Don't know how well this would work with stock 20" wheels.  
  3. 6" BDS Denali lift with 35x12.50r20's -  Seems to be a very popular lift.  Little more expensive than the 6" Fabtech but not terribly so.  Does offset front end a bit & requires 2" spacers for the rear to match if i'm not mistaken.       

 

So, with all that said, what'd you choose & why?  Any pics of these set ups would be helpful, especially from those with the 4" Fabtech lift.                            

Posted

If you're going to lift it , lift it. Go as big as you can afford.

Ditch the factory wheels too.

A lot of guys dipping their toes in the lifted truck water always want to keep their factory wheels. I did at one time too then I realized the offset looks dumb IMO.

 

Go here and look at hundreds of trucks like yours with 6" lifts and 35's

 

www.customwheeloffset.com

 

Go to the gallery and enter your truck and see what lift, wheels, tires look like

 

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

9deb229837b44f41f9e73356c2579f90.jpg

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, dieselfan1 said:

If you're going to lift it , lift it. Go as big as you can afford.

Ditch the factory wheels too.

A lot of guys dipping their toes in the lifted truck water always want to keep their factory wheels. I did at one time too then I realized the offset looks dumb IMO.

 

Go here and look at hundreds of trucks like yours with 6" lifts and 35's

 

www.customwheeloffset.com

 

Go to the gallery and enter your truck and see what lift, wheels, tires look like

 

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

 

 

Thanks Dieselfan1.  I do like the look of a 6" lift & 35's.  Can find a million pics of that setup too.  Harder to find good pics of the Fabtech 4" Denali lift though.  Seen a few with Fabtech's 4.5" knuckle lift & some of those with 35's as well.  Haven't seen any with the 4" denali/magride compatible thought.  

 

The one hesitation I have with a 6" lift & 35's is the expense.  They tend to be a little have more expensive tires, less gas mileage, more wear, etc.      

 

 

 

 

Posted

What's your budget for everything?

If you're not ready to drop at least $6000+ just for the lift, wheels and tires, and another $1200-1500 to install it, and a bunch of other stuff you'll want after you lift it, put a level kit on it and new tires call it a day.

Don't be so afraid to spend money and roll like me and my pal Frankie.

Oh and let's not forget my Bro covetedstyle[emoji857][emoji857][emoji857]

 

BTW I went shopping for you....

 

https://www.customwheeloffset.com/cart

3d5963c591edff64740994b7dca9aba5.jpgda0bad4e5022db78ab7c980eff1d3d97.jpga97649c35f3e18c091f45423ca539180.jpg

 

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

 

 

BTW we roll McGaughys 9"

 

  • Like 1
Posted

LOL!  $6000 + $1500 for install wasn't exactly within my budget.  More like $3500 for lift & tires is more like it for me.  Staying with the stock wheels for now.  That can be changed later on if I change my mind on the look & save me some cash for exhaust that I'll need next.  Labor cost will be only for the alignment once installed as I'll do the actual lift myself.  

 

Nice truck you got though...   

Posted

So not a Denali, but I have 3.5 of lift and 34s, on stock wheels, will give you an idea of the 4" lift size. I am right at 2k for tires, lift, and alignment. 

20210115_134416.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, YukonXL04 said:

So not a Denali, but I have 3.5 of lift and 34s, on stock wheels, will give you an idea of the 4" lift size. I am right at 2k for tires, lift, and alignment. 

20210115_134416.jpg

Nice clean looking setup.  Any rubbing or trimming required to fit those?

 

Posted
46 minutes ago, steve76t said:

Nice clean looking setup.  Any rubbing or trimming required to fit those?

 

Thanks, I like it alot. I am running 1.5" wheel spacers, so I had to trim the back side of the fender. Could have eliminated the rub with zip ties probably, but I wanted plenty of clearance so I did the norcal mod, I have over 1 inch on all sides, all steering positions now. And the factory plastic covers all signs of trimming.

Tires are 295/60R20 Falken Wildpeak AT3W

 

Here's a pic next to a stock chevy

20210117_113157.jpg

  • Thanks 1
Posted

I installed the fabtech gen 2 a couple months ago and have no issues at all with it.  I picked that lift because of the factory track width.  I wanted to run a 12 wide wheel without sticking out farther then needed.  

Posted
16 hours ago, vhreso said:

I installed the fabtech gen 2 a couple months ago and have no issues at all with it.  I picked that lift because of the factory track width.  I wanted to run a 12 wide wheel without sticking out farther then needed.  

What size tire do you have, what’s offset of your wheels & did ya have to trim much to make clearance for the tires?

 

Posted
On 1/21/2021 at 1:35 AM, steve76t said:

What size tire do you have, what’s offset of your wheels & did ya have to trim much to make clearance for the tires?

 

I have 22X12 -44 offset with 35" tires.  I was hoping to only need to do minor trimming but i ended up having to a norcal mod and minor trimming on the front valence.  

Posted

I'm thinking you pretty much have to norcal mod most of these trucks once you get into negative offsets. Im at a -12. Granted my kit said a 33 on stock offset was recommended tire size up to a 0 offset. Im a 34 on -12 so thats on me.

Posted

I have a 2018 Silverado custom. Went with a 4” lift and running 35x12.5R18. Did some minor trimming and everything is good. Love the lift. No rubbing at full turns and articulation off road. 

Posted
On 1/23/2021 at 7:19 PM, Jdherron said:

I have a 2018 Silverado custom. Went with a 4” lift and running 35x12.5R18. Did some minor trimming and everything is good. Love the lift. No rubbing at full turns and articulation off road. 

35's with only a 4" lift?  That leaves me with some questions... Which lift did you go with & what are you specs on the tire/wheel package?  Was advertised as a 4" lift or was the the actual amount of lift your got from the kit?   

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have a `25, 1500 that auto sets on incline. Never knew that at first. I have the electronic shifter. Just think if it didn`t do that? Unlike a mechanical shift that you can muscle out of park, how would you get this thing out? That would be a problem.   What I found out later is, I don`t have to push the button to release. Just put it in gear.   Setting parameters? Don`t know if it`s possible.
    • 2023 GMC 3500 HD, SLE, 6.6L Gas, 4x4, 6 Spd Options:  SLE Convenience Package; Driver Alert Package 1; Spray on Bedliner; X31 Off Road Package; TRAILERING MIRRORS, HEATED POWER -ADJUSTABLE, AUTO DIMMING, WITH TURN INDICATORS WHEELHOUSE LINERS, REAR INC. REAR AXLE - 3.73 RATIO INC. GVWR, 11,350 LBS. (5148 KG) INC. FRONT AND REAR PARK ASSIST, INC. ULTRASONIC     I have been launching my new boat and noticed some things related to the parking brake.. I usually set the parking brake (habit) when on flat ground for typical driving.    When backed down on the launch ramp to launch the boat and I place gear selector into Park, the parking brake activates automatically. My second nature is to set parking brake manually and noticed I was turing the parking brake off.  The parking brake appears to be setting itself automatically.   I looked all over my owner's manual and only found references to being on an incline and manually setting parking brake, or at times parking brake will be auto engaged, but nothing specific to my situation.    When is the parking brake automatically engaged?  Under what specific circumstances?  Can the auto set parameters be changed?     I like the auto set feature.  It would be nice if always engaged when shifted into Park and released when shifted out of Park (like my wifes 2025 RAV4).   Thanks!    
    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...