Jump to content

Video Rear View Mirror - Wiring Diagram Needed

Descartian
 Share

Recommended Posts

Descartian Enthusiast

Descartian

Posted
Posted

Hi All,  I am looking to install a factory video screen mirror and camera into my 2020 Sierra 2 door WT. As it’s a WT I do not believe it has the wiring harness that all other models do. 
 

Does anyone have a schematic for the 4 pins in the connector. Also if it helps wire colors are RED/BLACK/GREY/GREEN.

Descartian Enthusiast

Descartian

Posted
  • Author
Posted

If I’m reading this schematic correctly, what do the following wires control?

 

Pin 8 & 9.  Are these for the drivers side mirror only?

 

Pin 1. Backup lamp control.  Is this tied into the reverse lights and if so what function does it serve for the mirror?

829EF5FA-3D80-4F01-838C-6EE26A374D0E.png

Jim E Enthusiast

Jim E

Posted
Posted

Does the WT even have the camera system?

 

Just a guess, but when you reverse, the camera view is displayed on the radio (maybe it then doesn't display on the mirror).  Also, I think those mirrors have auto dimming, so it could disable dimming.

 

In any case, I'm sure someone can actually help.

Descartian Enthusiast

Descartian

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The WT has a backup camera system that interfaces with the IOR radio.
 

This is the video display mirror rear that is tied into the 3rd break light camera like on the Denali’s. I have all the parts including the cabling, mirror and camera, I just need the wiring requirements to install. 
 

WT’s do not come with an auto dimming mirror but the HD Video Mirror has a dimming sensor on the back of the mirror for the mirror and it ties into the auto dimming drivers side mirror if you have it (which WT’s do not). 

passat774 Enthusiast

passat774

Posted
Posted

 Are you trying to create and adapter for the WT that only has the one plug shown below? The is a picture of the plug in my 2021 Silverado WT

 

If so, I am very interested if you are able to create and adapter to make this work. 

2118712112_20210126_202112(2).jpg.365bb4ce8b48ef6424e6a5746a0bfb4d.jpg

mandrewbot3k Enthusiast

mandrewbot3k

Posted
Posted

I’m on mobile right now but gmupfitter should have what you’re looking for for identifying.

https://gmupfitter.com/files/media/photo/1290/20_Sierra_1500_Electrical_Body_Builder_2019JUN20.pdf

If I’m understanding the situation correctly, the WT doesn’t have the full x1 plug up top.

Based on the schematic I pulled up the DD8 wiring is probably whats available. DRZ being the rear cam. There is no red identified so that plug may be for something different under there. Possibly a rooftop beacon for the WT? If the full x1 is up there you should be able to tap into those pretty easily.
166994722a44cb1c5d7f6a62521ba1be.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 year later...
APerry New Member

APerry

Posted
Posted

Sir did you ever find out what the wire colors does what mine is identical. If you found out will you please help me? My name is Allan and I have to 2021 Chevrolet Silverado crewcab RST and I'm trying to add the video mirror and camera in the third brake light.  I desperately need to know the wire colors on the mirror. It's a GM 13536995. You can email me if you will please. [email protected]. Thank you in advance. 

16773337157821573191069484959170.jpg

16773337500274744648670438056532.jpg

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • SFC Retired
      2023 DRW Wheel Liners

      By SFC Retired · Posted

      Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • SFC Retired
      2023 DRW Wheel Liners

      By SFC Retired · Posted

      Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • KARNUT
      OCI, not when but why?

      By KARNUT · Posted

      As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...