Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I know this topic has been beat to death, but I'm looking at a 1.5" level kit for my 2021 RST Z71. I think 2" might be too much and I don't want that too much look. I initially was going to get a Moto Fab 1.5" Bottom spacer (link below), but I've read that there are issues with it hitting the CV boot. Is this still true?

 

https://www.americantrucks.com/motofab-silverado1500-150-inch-front-leveling-kit-ch-15lm.html

 

I'm more leaning towards the Pro Comp 1.5" top spacer kit, it appears this gets away from any issues. Although it is more pricey, relatively speaking, but I don't want issues down the road.

 

https://www.americantrucks.com/pro-comp-15-leveling-lift-kit-2019-silverado-1500-chevy.html?utm_content=AT Lift Kits - Leveling Kits and Body Lifts|Pro Comp Suspension&T5_Var4=S111877&utm_campaign=ATS+Silverado+Brand+%26+Vehicle+Low&dialogtech=ppc&utm_source=google-pla&utm_medium=shopping&T5_Var2=shopping&T5_Var3=red&gclid=Cj0KCQjwo-aCBhC-ARIsAAkNQivPqnizARafLFOeK3AD2B3GnUzMPfTx7ZGzZ15kf_pQH2kkbyi2F1AaAoU8EALw_wcB&gclsrc=aw.ds

 

What is the best option for a 1.5" Level? Thanks.

Edited by ms6040
Posted
I know this topic has been beat to death, but I'm looking at a 1.5" level kit for my 2021 RST Z71. I think 2" might be too much and I don't want that too much look. I initially was going to get a Moto Fab 1.5" Bottom spacer (link below), but I've read that there are issues with it hitting the CV boot. Is this still true?

 

https://www.americantrucks.com/motofab-silverado1500-150-inch-front-leveling-kit-ch-15lm.html

 

I'm more leaning towards the Pro Comp 1.5" top spacer kit, it appears this gets away from any issues. Although it is more pricey, relatively speaking, but I don't want issues down the road.

 

https://www.americantrucks.com/pro-comp-15-leveling-lift-kit-2019-silverado-1500-chevy.html?utm_content=AT Lift Kits - Leveling Kits and Body Lifts|Pro Comp Suspension&T5_Var4=S111877&utm_campaign=ATS+Silverado+Brand+%26+Vehicle+Low&dialogtech=ppc&utm_source=google-pla&utm_medium=shopping&T5_Var2=shopping&T5_Var3=red&gclid=Cj0KCQjwo-aCBhC-ARIsAAkNQivPqnizARafLFOeK3AD2B3GnUzMPfTx7ZGzZ15kf_pQH2kkbyi2F1AaAoU8EALw_wcB&gclsrc=aw.ds

 

What is the best option for a 1.5" Level? Thanks.

Not sure about issues with rubbing the CV boot, but I most recently had a lower aluminum 2” kit from ReadyLift. In 30k miles, there were no issues of any kind. My preference is the lower just based on ease of installation. Putting the upper in just requires pulling the whole strut. Many people will have many different reasoning, and that is mine.

1a338bb1018121fc35678a39217d376f.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I tried the lower 1.5" spacer and it did push the shock against the cv boot.  I went with the pro-comp top mount 1.5" spacer and it has been fine.  My truck now sits level according to a level I put across the bed rails.  My front fender well opening is 39.25", the rear fender is 28.75".  The truck seems to have sagged in the back a little, truck is 5 months old.  I say this because after I installed the 1.5", I was thinking I should have went with a 2" lift, but after the little bit of sagging rear I'm happy with the 1.5".  

Posted

If you go with the Pro Comp Suspension 1.50-Inch Leveling Lift Kit at $203. before the discount, you should just pay the extra $53. and get Bilstein 5100s at https://www.bilsteinlifts.com/shop/chevy-gmc/silverado-1500/2019/bilstein-b8-5100-0-2-5-front-lift-shocks-for-2019-2020-chevrolet-silverado-1500-2wd-4wd/

 

Install will be the same $ for both from what I know.  Just did the 5100s and love how the truck rides now.

Posted
16 minutes ago, RSVolcom said:

If you go with the Pro Comp Suspension 1.50-Inch Leveling Lift Kit at $203. before the discount, you should just pay the extra $53. and get Bilstein 5100s at https://www.bilsteinlifts.com/shop/chevy-gmc/silverado-1500/2019/bilstein-b8-5100-0-2-5-front-lift-shocks-for-2019-2020-chevrolet-silverado-1500-2wd-4wd/

 

Install will be the same $ for both from what I know.  Just did the 5100s and love how the truck rides now.

I'm half tempted at that option now. Did you end up with a solid 1.5" with one of the notches? Which one?

Posted
29 minutes ago, SILVER SLED said:

I tried the lower 1.5" spacer and it did push the shock against the cv boot.  I went with the pro-comp top mount 1.5" spacer and it has been fine.  My truck now sits level according to a level I put across the bed rails.  My front fender well opening is 39.25", the rear fender is 28.75".  The truck seems to have sagged in the back a little, truck is 5 months old.  I say this because after I installed the 1.5", I was thinking I should have went with a 2" lift, but after the little bit of sagging rear I'm happy with the 1.5".  

Thanks for the info. I'm steering away from the lower spacer and leaning towards either what you did or the Bilstein B8 5100 shocks as mentioned here. Those are tempting, especially if it will improve the ride. 

Posted
19 minutes ago, ms6040 said:

I'm half tempted at that option now. Did you end up with a solid 1.5" with one of the notches? Which one?

I couldn't tell you what notch it was set at for the front 293297.  Didn't do the install myself.  It is ever so slightly higher in the front, but that should all but dissipate in a few weeks once they settle.  I also did the back Bilstein 293471.  Picture attached and this was done last Friday 19MAR.

 

 I notice the main difference in the back with the new shocks.  Front as well but more in the back.  It was well worth doing both front/back in my eyes.  Initially I was going to do the lower spacer and quickly changed my mind after reading.   I'll take this on local trails in Big Bear so I didn't want to mess with the spacer for that main reason.

IMG_2335.jpg

Posted
2 hours ago, ms6040 said:

Thanks for the info. I'm steering away from the lower spacer and leaning towards either what you did or the Bilstein B8 5100 shocks as mentioned here. Those are tempting, especially if it will improve the ride. 

At $180 I would go with shocks too.  I only paid $80ish for my pro-comp spacers.  I can't find the actual price any more, but this is what I purchased.

AmericanTrucks

 

I see them for $130 on Amazon.  For what it's worth mine rides the same as before the spacers.  

 

 

 

 

Posted
On 3/23/2021 at 1:45 PM, RSVolcom said:

I couldn't tell you what notch it was set at for the front 293297.  Didn't do the install myself.  It is ever so slightly higher in the front, but that should all but dissipate in a few weeks once they settle.  I also did the back Bilstein 293471.  Picture attached and this was done last Friday 19MAR.

 

 I notice the main difference in the back with the new shocks.  Front as well but more in the back.  It was well worth doing both front/back in my eyes.  Initially I was going to do the lower spacer and quickly changed my mind after reading.   I'll take this on local trails in Big Bear so I didn't want to mess with the spacer for that main reason.

IMG_2335.jpg

What size tires?

Posted
17 hours ago, TJ1004 said:

Did your truck have a rear block from the factory or no block?

Not sure, didn't even look. 

Posted

I ended up ordering a set of front & rear Bilstein shocks. They are to be installed next week along with stock size Ridge Grapplers. I'm wondering if I will need a 1" block for the rear or not? I figure I'll see what it ends up at first. Looking forward to it.

Posted

I have the Bilsteins getting installed next week also. My truck doesn’t have a factory rear block. I only have about 1 1/4” rake on mine now. I think I’m going to do 1 1/2” setting on the front and add a 1” block in the rear. That should keep it level or slight rake, I don’t want it nose high. Still debating the rear block tho, I need to take some more accurate measurements before I do it. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,840
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    appletrav
    Newest Member
    appletrav
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 1 Anonymous, 325 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This is a 1/2 ton thing ONLY.  All HDs 2020-2026 have the two speed transfer case, with Autotrac as an option.     1/2 tons 2019-2026, regular 4x4s come with a single speed case (no 4LO!), and trucks with Z71 ordered, or all Trail Boss trucks come with the 2 speed case.  2 speed case is also an option on WT, and is also standard on High Country.  
    • 2013 5.3 still to this day calls for the PF48 filter.  Which as a 15psi bypass pressure.     There is a TSB, 17-NA-157 that talks about the PF-63 and PF-64 filters which have a higher bypass rating of 22psi.    TSB HERE - temp.xml   "Beginning in 2012, the oil pumps began to regulate main gallery feedback instead of pump out pressure. This means that the oil pump now does not begin to regulate until pressure is built up to the main gallery. This change reduces the amount of time it takes to provide oil to the engine bearing and lifters during extreme cold start conditions.  Main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are present on the following engine families which use Spin-on oil filters: Small Gas Engine (SGE), Large Gas Engine (LGE), High Feature (HFV6) Gen2 and Small Block Gen5 gasoline engines. These engines with the main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are factory built with an ACDelco® oil filters"   It also calls out what engines use those filters.  The gen 4 small blocks were not on that list (LMG, LC9, L9H, L92, L94, L20, L96).  Gen 5 small blocks use the higher pressure filter.          That all said...   Your 7045 Napa filter is the PF63 equivalent, with 22psi bypass.  You are already using the higher bypass pressure filter.  You CAN keep using it, you don't technically have to use it though.  
    • Do you know WHY the filter relief setting was increased to 22 psig?    When the new system goes into the second stage the pump volume ramps up considerably. It was found that the 15 psi filter bypass setting put the filter in bypass on a warm engine when the second stage was activated. Raising the filter bypass setting forced the filter to do what it designed to do. Filter. Preventing debris from circulating during high load, high rpm operation.    So next question is how did GM find this out? VLOM/lifter failures and a deep dive by Melling Corp.    Last question. Is it required? Look at it like this; a motor may be equipped with a rev limiter. But it only works if the set point in reached. That 22 psig setting only matters if the pressure differential across the filter media exceeds 15 psig during normal warm operation. Second stage kicks in around 3000-3500 rpm.    I can't answer your question because I don't know you and how you use the truck. But I think there is enough information here to let you decide for yourself. 😉
    • Probably not their first rodeo, so it should go as planned most likely.  Typically the service manager or tech doing the swap will put some seat time to shake it down after they get it all put back together.  We usually put 50-100mi before we hand them back so if something happens, its not after you get it.  A coolant leaks, oil leaks, a ground left off or loose, vibration, etc.     The new engines so far have been good?  There's been a couple that have popped out there again (the replacement engine) but most have been okay.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...