Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

From what I've determined the Snow/Camper upgrade to the 2021 AT4 Sierra 2500  [with regard to suspension]  includes a heavier duty torsion bar.  

 

I purchased an AT4 with this package, even though I didn't need or desire the package, because it had everything else I wanted.

 

Would it be possible, and how involved would it be, to revert the torsion bars to the stock versions (like an AT4 without the snow/camper package)? 

 

Now I will catch a lot of heat from you guys I know, for bringing up ride quality in an HD truck.  However I have a feeling this would make a notable improvement. Why have stiffer than necessary?  I will be towing with it in the near future, but will do a lot of daily driving too.  

 

In addition, I keep reading the rancho shocks are no bueno.  Thoughts?  

 

Thank you gents!

Edited by Sheen
Posted

The torsion bars can be swapped out. There have been other recent threads where how to do it was covered. It’s a somewhat heavy diy job because of how big the bars are and how tight they may fit in the front lower control arm.  If you are not a diy person the dealer or another mechanic can do it. Three hours labor plus parts would be my guess from watching the videos. Torsion bars will be in the ballpark of $250 each. So maybe around $1000 to $1200 have them swapped out.  Just guesstimating. 

Posted

Another thing to consider is whether you want to try to restore the active louver system in front of the radiator that is on trucks without the snow plow package. 

Posted

I could definitely handle the job myself IF the bars can be negotiated out by just removing the torsion bar keys.  If I'd have to remove the control arm etc, then no, I don't want to get into that.  

 

What!?!?  I'm missing the louver system too?  Yep, you're right, not there.  Even if you could have that installed, would the software be present to run it!?    How much better on average do these things improve mpg you think?

 

Thanks so much for your help.

Posted

You don’t need to pull the control arm, but you do need to remove a frame cross member further back just to get the bar out of the frame once it’s free. Search for videos on youtube. Someone else commented that the torsion bar front end fits tightly in the lower control arm, and may take serious hammering to break it loose. I have no experience with it myself. 

Posted (edited)

I don't think the ride difference will be different enough to even notice.  I sure have never noticed a difference in a plow prep vs. non plow prep HD (driven dozens of them at work).  

 

At the end of the day its still an HD.  Stiffer frame, stiffer axles, stiffer tires, massive leaf springs.  

 

Edited by newdude
Posted

Ok thanks guys. I ordered up the non-stow prep bars.  I'm gonna throw them in and see. I see what you're saying about the crossmember.  Should be able to get that out fairly easy.   Luckily it's new and not all rusted up yet, so I'm hoping be a little easier to pound that bar out of the control arm.

 

Ps. You might be right newdude.  I'll report back.  Might be a couple weeks tho.

Posted

Something that might be worth mentioning too is the future resale of the truck. I'm guessing that you'll get a better ride if you run your tires at 40psi instead of 80. 

But if you ever do go to sell the truck down the line the right thing to do would be to mention that is has the regular truck springs not the snow/camper ones. It might be worth keeping your stock ones. (I like keeping all of my stock parts if I chose to modify)

Im interested in the results as most of the 2500 trucks where I live come with the plow prep. 

Posted
3 hours ago, Logan Lanfear said:

Something that might be worth mentioning too is the future resale of the truck. I'm guessing that you'll get a better ride if you run your tires at 40psi instead of 80. 

But if you ever do go to sell the truck down the line the right thing to do would be to mention that is has the regular truck springs not the snow/camper ones. It might be worth keeping your stock ones. (I like keeping all of my stock parts if I chose to modify)

Im interested in the results as most of the 2500 trucks where I live come with the plow prep. 

That is excellent advice.  Rest assured I always fully disclose whenever I sell anything.  I believe very strongly into treating others the way I would like to be treated, but I appreciate the reminder none-the-less.  And great idea! I'll keep those bubble wrapped in the basement, and they'll stay brand new.  And who knows, maybe one day I'll get a camper;)  Also, for sure I'll report back - promise.  Thanks Logan!

Posted

Oh and Logan, about the PSI.  My door sticker calls for 60 Front, 70 Back.  I've taken the front down to 54 and the back 52. Cold. The ride does seem a lot better.  Could I actually go lower than that without a problem?  Sidewall max is 80.

Posted
On 5/10/2021 at 5:39 PM, newdude said:

At the end of the day its still an HD.  Stiffer frame, stiffer axles, stiffer tires, massive leaf springs.  

 

True, the unsprung spring rates whether plow package equipped or not are probably identical.

Posted
On 5/10/2021 at 10:19 PM, Sheen said:

Oh and Logan, about the PSI.  My door sticker calls for 60 Front, 70 Back.  I've taken the front down to 54 and the back 52. Cold. The ride does seem a lot better.  Could I actually go lower than that without a problem?  Sidewall max is 80.

I run 40 in my E range tires. I am not sure what rating your tires have but I would assume its E or more. Google your specific tire and you might find a minimum rating but sidewall flex is probably the biggest thing. With 40 I dont have any 'squish' in the rear tires and just a tiny bit in the front. 

It was a huge improvement on the ride to go from the 60 I was running down to 40. Felt like a different truck. 
Just remember to air back up when you're towing or loaded heavy. 

  • Like 1
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

So I actually ended up getting a set of 2020 Silverado 2500 torsion bars on ebay. These are the stock bars that would have been in my AT4 had I not bought one with the snowplow package. Measuring the diameters and calculating volume they had 7 or 8% less volume than the snowplow bars. I installed them, (super easy) and the ride is notably better. However, what I'm learning is that the relationship between the jouncers and the control arms are VERY important. Interestingly also, there are 4 jouncers on the front end of the truck. I'll call them extreme forward and middle forward, not to be confused with the rear jouncers above the leaf springs. The extreme forward and middle forward jouncers do not meet the control arm at the same time. In other words as you lower the rake of the truck the middle forwards will touch the control arm before the extreme forwards. I"m guess there is maybe 1/8 to 3/16 of an inch difference in when they touch the control arm. I have found through experimentation that squishing the middle forward jouncer just a little to allow the extreme forward jouncer to just kiss the control arm results in my best ride so far. If I raise it up from there where the middle forward jouncer kisses, and the extreme forward jouncer is about 1/8 inch above control arm, this has a noticeably worse ride. Obviously the higher the rake from there the worse the ride gets. ( I do drive the truck aggressively over bumps after every adjustment before I even check measurements or jouncer positions)

As far as tire pressure: I reached out to Goodyear and received the documents to account for different psi allowable under different loads.( thank you Logan)  I'm assuming my truck carries 60% of its weight on the front wheels and 40% on the back.  Assumption is based on multiple weight reports that show a 57/43 % split, albeit on older duramax trucks. And just for daily driving (not towing or hauling) a very comfortable figure of 9500 gross weight (full gas tank, myself, wife, and two kids, and 400 lbs of whatever else I put in the truck) allows me to go down to 55psi in the front and 40psi in the back. I've got 56 in the front and 46 in the back right now. Interestingly I had 56 in front and 50 in back and the ride seemed better than when I dropped the rears to 46. I'll continue experimenting there, but at least I know I'm 100% safe running those lower pressures now that I have the tire docs.  Just can't forget to inflate before I haul.  And I won't.

If anyone has any thoughts or concerns for me that don't include "why would you buy a HD truck and then ****** about the ride" I'd love to hear them. By the way, I've improved the ride already without compromising the handling or towing capacity or payload. From what I can tell so far using the stock non-snowplow torsion bars reduced my forward axel allowable weight from 6600 to 6000 but this has zero implication for towing or hauling at the levels I will be using it for.

If I still cannot get satisfied my next step will be upgrading the Rancho shocks, moving to an 18 inch wheel vs the 20 I have.  Because I test drove a SLT 2500 non-snowplow with 18 inch wheels and it felt so much better than my AT4.  But it didn't look as cool Lol.

Edited by Sheen
  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Folks, Have a great new 2026 WT  (std cab, 2.7/4WD) w/base 40/20/40 mech adj bench "fake buckets"  (with lower and upper center console) heavy vinyl seats.  Overall the seats are very comfortable and the vinyl is heavy and appears less likely to 'split out'. Am very tall (6'5")  + a bad back/osteporosis/former hyperparathyroidism so ease/range of movement is a bit restricted.  The truck rides a bit high and I use a nerf step bar w/my left foot to step in, then I put right foot/leg in, drag my butt in  & get seated.  Worked fine in my 2018 RAM quadCab. But I end up dragging my butt over the left raised sidecushsion area of vinyl seat, and due to texture there's fair amount of traction on slide inward.  (ArmorAll didn't improve.) If the seat were even ~1/2" - 3/4" lower it'd be helpful, but base seats just have the forward/backward underseat bail and the side lever for tilt which really doesn't affect seat height.   I really don't want to 'de-puff' the left side sidecushion forming the  fake 'bucket'. I know one company sells 'seat elevator blocks':  but is there a simple way of lowering the height of the driver seat instead?   Thanks Bill W San Jose  
    • I have a basic 2026 1500 WT  (2.7L/4WD reg cab shorttbed). Comfy, generally happy with electronics/radio - but is there a way I can add switches to steering wheel right-side position (curr. empty) so I can adjust volume, push phone button to voice dial, etc? Bill W San Jose  
    • The curb weight on a 1 ton crew cab long bed is around 7k lbs.  Now, I don't know where you went to school but 9k is not more than 2x 7k lbs. More than 2x 7k lbs would be 14k+.   With that said, obviously yes you're going to feel a 9k lb trailer when slowing down.  I already said, when accelerating.  When changing lanes?  No.  But if you look at the context of what was quoted, the original person said, "after a mile or two..." which means that would be after the accelerating portion and you're driving a generally steady pace.  Please do learn to read and comprehend.
    • So I purchased the Range unit for my 2026 and I am seeing different locations suggested for the ECM . Can anyone confirm wither under hood, left side or right side or behind the wheelwell?
    • Like I've said before. Di and Carbon buildup is not that big of a concern. Engine had minimal buildup, and that engine was obviously not super well maintained. Do regular oil changes, and you're gtg as long as the rest of the truck lasts. Also, the High Pressure FP that people ****** about, but can't tell you why.  Now, I wish they'd trash the variable oil pump. No real world issues with them, but I'll gladly eat whatever miniscule MPG it's saving me in favor of more oil at all RPMs.    Curious to see his assessment of the 7.3 compared to the 6.6. I expect he'll praise the port inj, but from a structural standpoint, the 6.6 is as robust as any engine out there.    Not to take away from the 7.3. I feel it's equally as good as the 6.6.     As to heat on the rear cyls, I'd have to see numerous examples before I'd say it's an issue. Especially not knowing the history of that engine. For all is known, they could have blown a rad hose, and ran it hot, and the 2 rear cyls may be the first to get hot in a low coolant situation, but not be an issue aside from that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...