Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Have a 2007 chevy truck with the 5.3, has about 100k on the engine. Truck feels sluggish until the engine hits 3.5k rpm, then will sorta suck you into the seat. Best way I can put it is that it always feels like I am towing something. 

 

My long term fuel trims are at -11 and -13 on bank 1 and 2.

 

Have replaced-

-spark plugs

-MAF

-changed CAI back to stock air cleaner

-evap vent solenoid (the one by the gas tank)

-new fuel pump (delphi)

 

(all these parts are less than 2 months old)

 

nothing is dragging, alignment is perfect, new shocks/struts so the truck has the proper rake angle. 

 

fuel pressure is steady at 62 PSI, drove the truck with the gauge hooked up and it did not drop under load. Injectors do not leak, with the truck off for around 5 mins the pressure did not go ANY lower than 55 psi. 

 

at my wits end, not sure where else to look. fuel economy is pretty bad too, the best I usually get on the freeway is about 15 on flat ground at 70. Used to get about 17-18. Getting expensive since I have a 275 mile drive I make once or twice a month. 

 

thanks for any feedback. 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Hans Myers said:

Have a 2007 chevy truck with the 5.3, has about 100k on the engine. Truck feels sluggish until the engine hits 3.5k rpm, then will sorta suck you into the seat. Best way I can put it is that it always feels like I am towing something. 

 

My long term fuel trims are at -11 and -13 on bank 1 and 2.

 

Have replaced-

-spark plugs

-MAF

-changed CAI back to stock air cleaner

-evap vent solenoid (the one by the gas tank)

-new fuel pump (delphi)

 

(all these parts are less than 2 months old)

 

nothing is dragging, alignment is perfect, new shocks/struts so the truck has the proper rake angle. 

 

fuel pressure is steady at 62 PSI, drove the truck with the gauge hooked up and it did not drop under load. Injectors do not leak, with the truck off for around 5 mins the pressure did not go ANY lower than 55 psi. 

 

at my wits end, not sure where else to look. fuel economy is pretty bad too, the best I usually get on the freeway is about 15 on flat ground at 70. Used to get about 17-18. Getting expensive since I have a 275 mile drive I make once or twice a month. 

 

thanks for any feedback. 

 

Probably time for new intake gaskets.  Try re-torqueing them first.  You can watch the O2 sensors and spray water, propane, MAP gas, whatever, along the intake and heads and see if the numbers spike, along with the idle.

Posted
1 hour ago, swathdiver said:

Probably time for new intake gaskets.  Try re-torqueing them first.  You can watch the O2 sensors and spray water, propane, MAP gas, whatever, along the intake and heads and see if the numbers spike, along with the idle.

 

Yeah I could give that a try. Correct me if I am wrong, but wouldn't an air intake leak cause positive fuel trims, as the ECU has to compensate for the extra air? 

Posted

If you have a fancy scan tool you can look at the ethanol or alcohol percentage/content that the truck thinks is in the fuel. If that number is far greater than the standard 8-10% content that you find in mostly all pump stations running E10 fuels, then you have found a possible issue.

 

The nothing below 3,000rpm is kinda par for the course when it comes to 5.3's and 4L60e's with the newer computers. It's not in it's main power band until then and you also have the computer limiting it a little because of torque management and delays built into the calibration. After market tuning and those pedal commander things do help a lot with overall throttle response and performance. Not exactly giving you more power but just giving you what was there.

  • Like 1
Posted

See my post here, its not your exact engine/year but I was having fuel trim issues and had a vacuum leak causing negative LTFT.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 9/26/2021 at 8:32 PM, CamGTP said:

If you have a fancy scan tool you can look at the ethanol or alcohol percentage/content that the truck thinks is in the fuel. If that number is far greater than the standard 8-10% content that you find in mostly all pump stations running E10 fuels, then you have found a possible issue.

 

The nothing below 3,000rpm is kinda par for the course when it comes to 5.3's and 4L60e's with the newer computers. It's not in it's main power band until then and you also have the computer limiting it a little because of torque management and delays built into the calibration. After market tuning and those pedal commander things do help a lot with overall throttle response and performance. Not exactly giving you more power but just giving you what was there.

I have a scan tool with live data. Ethanol reading is normal, at 10%, which is what I filled it with.

Posted
On 9/27/2021 at 12:36 AM, ic3man5 said:

See my post here, its not your exact engine/year but I was having fuel trim issues and had a vacuum leak causing negative LTFT.

 

 

I'll have to take a look at that, thanks.

Posted (edited)

Well, still no progress. Replaced my evap purge valve, seems to be a little better after that but not by much. Also replaced my TPS as well, which made no difference. 

 

Couple things I have noticed, which seem to be a little weird. My fuel trims go farther down into the negatives when I run the A/C. When it is not running, the trims go up by a number or two. 

 

My MAP sensor reads about 10 in-hg at idle, and about 11.8 with the A/C on. MAF is flowing at 0.8lb/min w/out A/C, and 0.9 with it on. 

 

Also wanted to mention that the fuel trims have went down to -17 and -14. 

Edited by Hans Myers
Posted

What are the chances that you have a minor leaking of the a few injectors. Like they are dribbling fuel out.

 

I'm sure what else to say at the moment, anything else is kinda just shot gunning parts at it.

Posted
12 hours ago, CamGTP said:

What are the chances that you have a minor leaking of the a few injectors. Like they are dribbling fuel out.

 

I'm sure what else to say at the moment, anything else is kinda just shot gunning parts at it.

I kinda doubt that since the fuel trims are fairly similar on both banks. Did a leak test and it held at 55 psi for a good 20 mins. 

 

Possibly a bad pcv system? Not sure where else to look. I would have thought the problem would have been solved with the parts I have replaced.

 

 

Posted

well, I was going over the pictures I took of the fuel trims over a few weeks. Bank 2 is consistently 3 points lower than bank 1 at all times. 

 

Just for the hell of it, I am going to switch injectors from bank 1 to bank 2, and vice versa. If I see that my trims change on each bank I will know if that is the issue.

Posted

If this is a FlexFuel engine, reset the alcohol content and LTFTs after running the tank down as much as possible and refueling with E10 or E0.  The Tech-2 or scan tool will reset the alcohol content to 3% and then the computer will re compute from there.  Don't reset until after the computer finishes calculating the new alcohol content after refueling.

 

Mine has been doing this lately, rarely gets close to 0% LTFTs and goes mid teens at idle.  Took a fuel sample from the rail and it is 80% and the computer says 67%.  Time to reset for me too.

Posted

My 2010 4.8 did the same thing and had 2 issues, alcohol percentage was 35%, fixed that and still an issue. Turned out to be the vacuum port on the passenger side valve cover had been knocked off when changing the plugs. Put a rubber cap on it and it clear my negative LTFTs on both banks.

 

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
Posted

Lean conditions are usually due to a vacuum leak. That's based on my experience tuning 04 gto

 

I kept getting a code and finally replaced the intake tub that joins to the throttle body. Had a hairline crack that overtime lead the the code.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I just can't think of the exact term GM uses for that higher gvw package without looking at the website but basically sort of a trailering package and I imagine it may also have been created to skirt around the licensing fee differences between a3/4 and 1 ton that apply in some states although ironically I believe in some states its the reverse that a 1 ton is the cheaper truck to license over a 3/4 ton. It makes no difference here in Alberta but oddly enough a 1 ton through my insurance company is a bit cheaper to insure over a 3/4 ton as its based on the insurance statistics they generate.    For sure when ever you do have the chance to weigh your truck and to be fair, try to have the fuel tank full or nearly so rather than give yourself a false sense of the truck being lighter by having an almost empty tank.    In my other comment I was mentioning stock sized tires and partly in case someone was reading this and thinking they could lower their pressure down to what your aftermarket tires are able to do with your empty truck as that is a vastly different picture in the leeway you have to play with for running minimum pressures while remaining safe. I will say also that its easy to see from reactions of truck owners that may have been more used to owning a half ton in the past or a car and be it on a forum like this or in person etc that they get so wrapped up in that placard pressure sticker that they can't get their head wrapped around the fact that an HD truck due to how much it can carry can also vary the tire pressures drastically lower than those pressures ( typically more so for the rear axle on stock sized tires ) when empty vs some car that isn't made to carry much so the tire pressures can't be lowered since it needs almost that much pressure just to carry the empty car.    If I ever do find myself in the states with this truck, I will only be too happy to switch it over to the US measuring system as then I will understand all the dash readings. The only thing that is off for me slightly with US measurements is US miles per gallon as I grew up with the Imperial gallon and to this day up here anyway speak in Imperial miles per gallon ( I don't do that on this forum though as that would confuse everyone for no good reason ). 
    • Yes that's right, it's the upgrade that includes the overload spring and all that stuff.   Someday when I'm empty and going by a scale I'm going to stop in and get some weight readings.   Exactly  you should have the ability to change individual settings, in in Canada so I'm driving with kph but then I'm stuck with kpa when I want psi lol    
    • You must have that upgraded gvw package which is only available or at least was in 2025 with the diesel engine for the 3/4 ton and that gave the truck physically the larger 12.0 ring gear rear diff and the 3500 rear spring pack. There is a difference in what the diff housing looks like externally as one tell tale and also your truck should have the upper overload spring pack and the frame pads that the pack goes up against.    The pressure the tpms system kicks the alarm in on a stock setting truck, that is a good question and was just from what I recall but I doubt I made any notes on it as I knew for the rear that it was not at all what I was after regardless either. Being that you have a diesel and if running on stock tires the minimum pressure on an empty truck seems to be around 50 psi from hearing of those that have weighted the front axle but the rear axle is very similar in weight to a gas truck and again a near empty truck on the rear could go down to 35 pounds at minimum. However the weigh scale is the proper way to know for sure as a guide.    As to changing the readings on the dash from metric to the US measuring system, oh yes that is done easily but what I was attempting to explain was that I can't pick and choose items I want to have in US and those I still want in the metric system at the same time as its either all or none. For example lets say you drove into Canada and switched your dash over to metric so your speedometer read in km an hour, well then your reading kilopascals on your tpms readout and your wife looks over and says what the hell is that saying in the tpms screen and you say "darned if I know, I think its Chinese" !
    • This is partly why I decided to have switched over to Amsoil SS as a way of hopefully preventing the buildup of the sludge/carbon on the pistons and clogging of the oil control rings and the carbon that would cause the compression rings to stick in their grooves as well as stay cleaner up top of the heads in the valve train in the first place, an oil that has tested better by third party testing over typical shelf oil and also doing my best to run relatively short OCI. However in saying that I don't think there is any way to easily prove the oil I was using prior allowed for a buildup at the OCI I was doing, nor in the other direction to make claims the Amsoil is keeping everything clean either. There really isn't a window into the engine is there to know anything for certain even if oil samples were taken for example that showed still healthy oil being dropped out of the oil pan other than engine tear downs that extensive and expensive testing of oils does to actually visually see what is really going on inside the engine. I wish there was some easy method of seeing what is going on but I don't happen to be aware of that if there is.  
    • My truck is a ¾ ton but my placard also says 80 for the rear tires, I think I might have the upgraded suspension to the 3500 series maybe.   I put my air down to 60 and the light was still on, and there was no way I was putting over 60 psi in the rear empty and not towing because I knew the actual number Toyo gave me and I didn't wanna ruin the center of my tires!   And you actually can change it in the settings from metric or is and it will show kph or mph then when you go into your tire settings it will be either psi or kpa, but it would be nice to just change it directly on the tire psi page 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...